-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Serious Just In - Lee Wei Ling is Back 6 Jan 2019
- Thread starter Kee Chew
- Start date
Another point to add..if the AGC argues that Dead Fart was mentally incapable and the will is invalid etc etc,,,which means Pinky allowed a mad man to be in Parleement and the MP for Tanjong Pagar which will discredit dead fart,,because he is incapable of executing his duties as an MP,,,,it is sad,,but Pinky has just made himself look more incompetent,,,,LHY and LWL need to up the heat on Pinky. I hope LHY contest the next presidential erection to make things harder for Pinky,,,,LHY despite being a son of dead fart is more humane and is a more down to Earth Person than dead fart and pinky,,,guess a bad tree does have good fruits,,
Good points...let us all point out how bad LHL is
Indeed. Chinese saying 修身齐家治国平天下
Cb Loong sick cancer chicken can’t even take care of his health and manage his family still want to head country
The LHY portion thing is way over played. Because the main beneficiary if the previous will was used is LWL. And LWL is not even bothered by this,,so why should Pinky care? and Pinky sold his Share of oxley to LHY,,and now uses the gahmen to control the property? of course LHY dulan,,,,but LHY is rich enough,,,,LHY and LWL does not want the house to be used as a monument to perpetuate Pinky's family controlling singkieland
If that is the case,,,,and dead fart is a lawyer,,why he use LSF and her law firm to draft the will? If he done it,,,why was he not concerned about his daughter in law getting into hot soup by asking her to draft the will? And dont forget,,the executor of the will was LHY and Ho Jinx,,if it was really a question of ethics,,why make the Jinx an executor?
Lee Hsien Yang's wife may have breached lawyer's code of conduct: AGC
Nicholas Yong
Assistant News Editor
Yahoo News Singapore7 January 2019
According to the Attorney-General’s Chambers, lawyer Lee Suet Fern (left), may have conducted herself unprofessionally amid her alleged involvement in the late Lee Kuan Yew’s will. (PHOTOS: Morgan Lewis/Facebook, Yahoo News Singapore)
More
The Attorney-General’s Chambers’ (AGC) complaint to the Law Society about Lee Suet Fern, the wife of Lee Hsien Yang, was regarding a case of possible “professional misconduct” in her alleged preparation of Lee Kuan Yew’s final will.
In a statement on Monday (7 January) morning, the AGC said that Suet Fern “appears to have prepared the Last Will of Mr Lee Kuan Yew and arranged for Mr Lee Kuan Yew to execute it, despite the fact that her husband, Mr Lee Hsien Yang, is one of the beneficiaries under the Last Will.
“Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s share increased under the Last Will,” it added.
The AGC noted that the Professional Conduct Rules of the legal profession require that lawyers do not place themselves in a position of conflict.
For example, where a person intends to make a significant gift by will to any member of the lawyer’s family, the lawyer must not act for the person and must advise him to obtain independent advice in respect of the gift. This rule applies even if the lawyer is related to the person making the gift.
Suet Fern’s act of preparing the will “appears prima facie to be in breach of Rules 25 and 46 of the Professional Conduct Rules”, said the AGC. It noted that it has a “statutory duty to deal with misconduct by lawyers and may refer such individuals to the Law Society”.
The Law Society, which represents all lawyers in Singapore, maintains standards of conduct with the nation’s legal fraternity and can take disciplinary action against its members when breaches occur.
“As the Attorney-General has recused himself from this case, the matter has been overseen by Deputy Attorney-General Lionel Yee,” it added, referring to Lucien Wong, who was formerly Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s personal lawyer. Wong was appointed Singapore’s Attorney-General in November 2016.
No response since October 2018
The AGC said it has written to Suet Fern several times since October 2018, asking her to explain her role, if any, in the preparation of Lee Kuan Yew’s last will. However, she has yet to respond to these questions “despite asking for extensions of time”, it added.
“Given her refusal to answer, AGC then referred the matter to the Law Society. The Deputy Attorney-General has also further requested that the matter be referred to a Disciplinary Tribunal,” said the AGC.
“In referring the matter to the Law Society, the AGC does not make any findings on the merits of the case. AGC does not determine guilt or innocence,” it added.
The AGC’s statement follows a Facebook post by Lee Kuan Yew’s daughter Wei Ling on Sunday evening, in which she revealed that the AGC had lodged “more than 500 pages of complaint” against Suet Fern over her alleged role in the drafting of the will.
Hsien Yang has maintained that his father’s final will was drafted by lawyer Kwa Kim Li – which the latter has denied – and that Stamford Law Corporation, his wife’s law firm at the time, did not draft any of his father’s wills.
Instead, Suet Fern merely facilitated the witnessing and signing of the final will, according to Hsien Yang.
“Paragraph 7 (the demolition clause) of the Will was drafted at LKY’s direction, and put into language by Lee Suet Fern his daughter-in-law and when he was satisfied he asked Kim Li to insert it into his will,” said Hsien Yang in a Facebook post from June 2016.
Wei Ling’s post and the AGC’s statement are the latest developments in the long-running Lee saga, which first erupted on 14 June 2017 when Wei Ling and Hsien Yang issued a joint statement of “no confidence” against their elder brother, Hsien Loong.
They claimed to have been threatened amid his pursuit of a personal agenda over their former family home at 38 Oxley Road and accused the their brother of plotting to keep the house in order to build a political dynasty.
Nicholas Yong
Assistant News Editor
Yahoo News Singapore7 January 2019
According to the Attorney-General’s Chambers, lawyer Lee Suet Fern (left), may have conducted herself unprofessionally amid her alleged involvement in the late Lee Kuan Yew’s will. (PHOTOS: Morgan Lewis/Facebook, Yahoo News Singapore)
More
The Attorney-General’s Chambers’ (AGC) complaint to the Law Society about Lee Suet Fern, the wife of Lee Hsien Yang, was regarding a case of possible “professional misconduct” in her alleged preparation of Lee Kuan Yew’s final will.
In a statement on Monday (7 January) morning, the AGC said that Suet Fern “appears to have prepared the Last Will of Mr Lee Kuan Yew and arranged for Mr Lee Kuan Yew to execute it, despite the fact that her husband, Mr Lee Hsien Yang, is one of the beneficiaries under the Last Will.
“Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s share increased under the Last Will,” it added.
The AGC noted that the Professional Conduct Rules of the legal profession require that lawyers do not place themselves in a position of conflict.
For example, where a person intends to make a significant gift by will to any member of the lawyer’s family, the lawyer must not act for the person and must advise him to obtain independent advice in respect of the gift. This rule applies even if the lawyer is related to the person making the gift.
Suet Fern’s act of preparing the will “appears prima facie to be in breach of Rules 25 and 46 of the Professional Conduct Rules”, said the AGC. It noted that it has a “statutory duty to deal with misconduct by lawyers and may refer such individuals to the Law Society”.
The Law Society, which represents all lawyers in Singapore, maintains standards of conduct with the nation’s legal fraternity and can take disciplinary action against its members when breaches occur.
“As the Attorney-General has recused himself from this case, the matter has been overseen by Deputy Attorney-General Lionel Yee,” it added, referring to Lucien Wong, who was formerly Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s personal lawyer. Wong was appointed Singapore’s Attorney-General in November 2016.
No response since October 2018
The AGC said it has written to Suet Fern several times since October 2018, asking her to explain her role, if any, in the preparation of Lee Kuan Yew’s last will. However, she has yet to respond to these questions “despite asking for extensions of time”, it added.
“Given her refusal to answer, AGC then referred the matter to the Law Society. The Deputy Attorney-General has also further requested that the matter be referred to a Disciplinary Tribunal,” said the AGC.
“In referring the matter to the Law Society, the AGC does not make any findings on the merits of the case. AGC does not determine guilt or innocence,” it added.
The AGC’s statement follows a Facebook post by Lee Kuan Yew’s daughter Wei Ling on Sunday evening, in which she revealed that the AGC had lodged “more than 500 pages of complaint” against Suet Fern over her alleged role in the drafting of the will.
Hsien Yang has maintained that his father’s final will was drafted by lawyer Kwa Kim Li – which the latter has denied – and that Stamford Law Corporation, his wife’s law firm at the time, did not draft any of his father’s wills.
Instead, Suet Fern merely facilitated the witnessing and signing of the final will, according to Hsien Yang.
“Paragraph 7 (the demolition clause) of the Will was drafted at LKY’s direction, and put into language by Lee Suet Fern his daughter-in-law and when he was satisfied he asked Kim Li to insert it into his will,” said Hsien Yang in a Facebook post from June 2016.
Wei Ling’s post and the AGC’s statement are the latest developments in the long-running Lee saga, which first erupted on 14 June 2017 when Wei Ling and Hsien Yang issued a joint statement of “no confidence” against their elder brother, Hsien Loong.
They claimed to have been threatened amid his pursuit of a personal agenda over their former family home at 38 Oxley Road and accused the their brother of plotting to keep the house in order to build a political dynasty.
LHY and LWL are the good guys (literally
). They simply want to fulfill ah gong's wish to prevent the house being used as a shrine. Pinky is a weak leader, he needs all the mojo that ah gong's legacy can provide. That said, the stage is set for the Clash of the Titans - Singapore Edition. Guaranteed to be a blockbuster.
LHY and LWL are the good guys (literally
The architect of all this shit is obviously the Jinx..,,I hope the Jinx will bring about the downfall of Pinky,,,,like the way Mugabe wife bought about the downfall of Mugabe
I think the pertinent question is why is the AGC involved with the complaint? Shouldn't it be LHL submitting the complaint in his private capacity?
The whole thing smells like LHL directing the AGC to find ways to fix his siblings.
abusing state organs for personal gains?
wow!!! altogether now!!! huat ah!!!
Verily verily I say, that GE2019 will be a bitter pill for pinky. His multitude of mis-steps is waking sinkies up. Frivolous lawsuit against nephew, against Leong, kept quiet during the mudland saga etc etc etc and now this. He should've just be a Mathematician, I am sure he would've been a good one.
Similar threads
