Who touch who first?touching a person who gave no consent is technically an assault
Who touch who first?touching a person who gave no consent is technically an assault
Who touch who first?
law doesn't look at it that way...unless you are talking about street fights ....who stared first ?...unless ,your reaction are in self defence ...who touched who first is irrelevantWho touch who first?
So if someone initiated and touched me I can kena charged because they touched me and said I assaulted them?law doesn't look at it that way...unless you are talking about street fights ....who stared first ?...unless ,your reaction are in self defence ...who touched who first is irrelevant
KNN on 2nd thought my uncle think @ginfreely will say I'm not a person I'm a suay cheebye KNNKNN my uncle think she is just a siao ji rike @ginfreely will say I'm not a slut I'm a virgin KNN
Evil bastards are the same COWARD. No guts to take up challenge don’t open your ccb mouth to point ccb fingers lah simple as that and yes I am a suay cb indeed to be a virgin called a public toilet.
Another COWARD BULLY that dare not take up my challenge so you should know it’s a fact that I am a suay chee called by ccb sluts and sons of sluts like you and kt latha to be slut.
I am indeed a suay cb very suay since born and meet you filthy Malaysian Indian sluts and sons of sluts accusing me one. Pui your filthy Malay
law doesn't look at it that way...unless you are talking about street fights ....who dared first ?...unless ,your reaction are in self defence ...who touched who first is irrelevantWho touch who first?
it depends who is that someone and inent plays a great part ...the difference being ,you a man so if another man touches you what is their intent lies in you to prove it but the onus is entirely of a man if he touches a woman ,simply put it is assumed that a man touches a woman in a non consenting manner than the man has to prove his intentionSo if someone initiated and touched me I can kena charged because they touched me and said I assaulted them?
you are confusing me here...if some one touch you first ,than its you who can claim to have been assaulted ...but than the question of intend will arise tooSo if someone initiated and touched me I can kena charged because they touched me and said I assaulted them?
Which is why I asked who touch who first. But your reply was it doesnt matter. What talking you?you are confusing me here...if some one touch you first ,than its you who can claim to have been assaulted ...but than the question of intend will arise too
let me rephrase if a man touches another man ...the law places weight on intent ...but if man touches a woman than it is assumed that man is most likely at fault...so,the onus is not for the woman to prove the man's intent but the onus entirely of the man to prove his innocenceWhich is why I asked who touch who first. But your reply was it doesnt matter. What talking you?
This is a test to our SPF & MOM ...
Arrest her is a good start, hope it ends well too
Revolve her Citizenship & Deport her asap !
KNN on 2nd thought my uncle think @ginfreely will say I'm not a person I'm a suay cheebye KNN
That is so inhumane .....to the poor innocent traffic cone.SPF claimed that this cunt is a 40 yo Sinkie. It's time to ram her against the wall and fuck her black CB with a orange traffic cone.
Are you scroobal?let me rephrase if a man touches another man ...the law places weight on intent ...but if man touches a woman than it is assumed that man is most likely at fault...so,the onus is not for the woman to prove the man's intent but the onus entirely of the man to prove his innocence
That is so inhumane .....to the poor innocent traffic cone.
I believe he held on to her phone because there was a chance she could delete some video(s) which could prove helpful to investigation, not advantageous to her.let me rephrase if a man touches another man ...the law places weight on intent ...but if man touches a woman than it is assumed that man is most likely at fault...so,the onus is not for the woman to prove the man's intent but the onus entirely of the man to prove his innocence