[h=1]Singapore vote will test ruling party’s grip on power[/h]
San Francisco Chronicle
New York Times16 hrs ago
SHARE
TWEET
PIN IT
EMAIL
[h=4]East Coast: Time for change?[/h]
SINGAPORE — The vast open field was awash in blue.
More than 50,000 people, wearing the color of the opposition Workers’ Party, cheered wildly as speaker after speaker called on Singaporeans to vote for change. Whistles, drums and bugle calls stirred the crowd.
“This is the biggest I’ve ever seen,” Michael Goh, who at 71 is older than independent Singapore itself, said as he waded into the rally last week. “You go anywhere, it’s not as big as this.”
For an election in which one party always wins, there has been a lot of excitement on the streets of Singapore ahead of the parliamentary vote Friday. The vote will be the first since the death of modern Singapore’s founding father, Lee Kuan Yew, in March, and the first in which all 89 seats are being contested. It also comes during the tropical island state’s 50th anniversary of independence.
Signs of discontent
Perhaps most important, it is the first general election since 2011, when voters awarded their government with something it had never seen during its five unchallenged decades in power: a barely passing grade. There were signs of discontent, especially among the young and the poor, over the lack of jobs and affordable housing, the rising cost of living and competition from foreign workers.
Chastised by winning barely 60 percent of the vote, its worst showing ever, the governing People’s Action Party, or PAP, embarked on a period of soul-searching.
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, the son of Singapore’s founder, publicly apologized for some of his government’s previous policies and has spent the past four years trying to make amends.
His government has, among other things, slightly curbed the influx of skilled foreign talent that was perceived to have been taking jobs from Singaporeans, rolled out subsidized health care programs for all Singaporeans and other welfare programs to help the working class deal with high living costs, and tried to make it easier for citizens to buy government-subsidized housing.
To help pay for the new programs, the government announced a tax increase in February on the top 5 percent of earners, a radical step in a nation that has low taxes embedded in its DNA.
© Ng Han Guan, Associated Press In this Sept. 7, 2015, photo, Sylvia Lim, Singapore's opposition Workers' Party candidate, speaks during a rally in Singapore. A policewoman-turned law teacher-turned-politician…The question voters will answer Friday, then, is whether these steps have been enough.
There is little doubt that the governing party will win — even in 2011, it won 81 of the 87 contested seats, thanks to a British-style first-past-the-post formula — but by how much remains to be seen.
“We say that 2011 was a watershed election, but whether it is or not, this time will tell,” said Chua Beng Huat, a political analyst and head of the sociology department at the National University of Singapore.
“If the PAP ups its percentage” of the popular vote, he said, “we will have to rewrite the watershed.”
Viable opposition
Analysts say the party’s main opposition, the populist Workers’ Party, stands a good chance of retaining the six seats it won in 2011, and possibly adding a few more, giving the country a viable opposition for the first time.
The Workers’ Party positions itself as the only check on the governing party, which Low Thia Khiang, the head of the Workers’ Party, said otherwise rules by its “whims and fancies.”
“We must remind the PAP that there is a distinction between what is national interest and what is the PAP’s party interest,” Low said.
For the Workers’ Party, that means more curbs on immigration, the introduction of a minimum wage and more spending on education.