The Truth Behind Dinesh Raman Death

[WongMengMeng]

Mr Wong , I have not replied to you before. I respect your great knowledge and intellect. But please do not get me wrong.There is nothing subtle or subliminal about my post #173. I have nothing to do with Mr Scroobal too. Both of you are just too powerful for me.I will withdraw with humility for your power and knowledge are beyond me.

You can see for yourself There is This Mad Man who keeps INFRACTING ME ( 21 times )...As a man who champions Justice, do you think I am being unfairly Infracted? Do I deserve to be Infracted for almost every posting here? Thank you.

Only LeongSam can help you. In this forum, he is the prosecutor, the jury and the judge. I am not aware that any nick has infracted you. As you can see, I have no power to infract and hardly ever reads the infraction log, which is only for kaypohs.

 

[winnipegjets]

But did you draw the wrong conclusion about kopiuncle ? Thank you.

You're a piece of work, you know?

 

[kopiuncle]

Why you make enemies? Now, you call Kee Chiu to help you lah.

i did not make any enemies here
they made enemy out of me
now i got 22 infractions from that mad and drunkard man
yet nobody bait an eyelid here
guess i deserved to be fucked
what do you think? can you save me from being banished from here?
i am just an ordinary retired old kopi uncle
can you help me to remove those strangling hold by that mad man here ?
it is getting suffocating and it chokes me badly
thank you...

 

[kopiuncle]

Only LeongSam can help you. In this forum, he is the prosecutor, the jury and the judge. I am not aware that any nick has infracted you. As you can see, I have no power to infract and hardly ever reads the infraction log, which is only for kaypohs.

Thank you Mr Wong.

But at least, you can have some comments to make regarding these insane infractions ? Are they justified? Are they just sheer mischief ? Or are these infractions work of a mad and intoxicated man of no consequence? As a champion of fairness and justice here in this forum, it will help a great deal if you could very kindly say your piece. You can help me by saying something without Mr Sam Leong doing anything to salvage the victim from being banished soon.

Your words and comments are highly respectful and influential here I must admit. Thank you. Please help me.

 

[WongMengMeng]

Brilliant piece of advcie indeed..



But did you draw the wrong conclusion about kopiuncle ? Thank you.

There are two ways of looking at you and small caps does not feature.

1) You are PAP IB.

2) You are fake PAP IB, created by someone to create trouble for the real PAP IB.

As LeongSam once advised, he only looks at what is on the screen and responds accordingly. What is on the screen in your posts is clearly pro-PAP and very boot lickingly so if I may say.

To me then, it doesn't matter if you are (1) or (2), if what you talk don't make sense, I counter you. For if you are (2) ie. a fake PAP IB creating trouble for the real PAP IB, you would welcome that right? Of course you won't give the game away by admitting it.

 

[kopiuncle]

You're a piece of work, you know?

Swiss Cuckoo Clock ?

 

[Jah_rastafar_I]

It is probable but is that a fact in this case. You, like the others, totally dismiss the possibility that the instigator could be the prison officers. Why? Because the victim is a keling?

If that inmate was a keling, then it would be deserving?

no since when has anyone ever said that? Now you are making up rubbish.

 

[kopiuncle]

There are two ways of looking at you and small caps does not feature.

1) You are PAP IB.

2) You are fake PAP IB, created by someone to create trouble for the real PAP IB.

As LeongSam once advised, he only looks at what is on the screen and responds accordingly. What is on the screen in your posts is clearly pro-PAP and very boot lickingly so if I may say.

To me then, it doesn't matter if you are (1) or (2), if what you talk don't make sense, I counter you. For if you are (2) ie. a fake PAP IB creating trouble for the real PAP IB, you would welcome that right? Of course you won't give the game away by admitting it.

Brilliant Mr Wong. Superbly brilliant! But I must say you are wrong on BOTH accounts. Thank you for giving me your feedback.

You did not answer my question Mr Wong. Any comments on that mad fella infracting me ? Now 23 infractions and more coming.

 

[Jah_rastafar_I]

Well, their standard beating went awry this time, they killed him.
How do you know that he wasn't retaliating or defending him?

Because like zeddy mentioned if something like that occured the wardens would be prosecuted.

You think the PAP government is so dumb to put out aspects of the truth that will hurt its case to pay out the least compensation?



Wow, now you have become the insider with the facts. I can't argue with you then since you know all the facts of the case. I concede.

many prisoners got abused if you read zeddy's account and they got justice served for them. Following your stupid logic they should all repoen their cases and demand even more compensation and etc etc. Yup someone working in prisons mentioned the reason why dinesh attacked the warden and he even knows the warden's name it had nothing to do with insulting his family etc this shit skin acted like a typical skin and got offended over a small thing and definitely deserved it.

I don't know the facts and neither do you. All we have are the 'facts' according to the government. The coroner inquest should not have been cancelled. Since when the criminal investigation has the final say? In Shane Todd's case, the SPF concluded that he committed suicide. A two-week, widely publicized, coroner inquiry still went ahead. There were cross examination of witness etc. While the conclusion was expected, keen observers could see the inconsistencies in the testimonies and form their own conclusion.
And then there is a slap in the wrist sentence for the perpetrator.
If these developments do not raise a question of doubt on the government story, you are more gullible than I thought you were.

You moron. The shane todd case is harder to solve. In this case it's pretty straightforward.

 

[WongMengMeng]

Thank you Mr Wong.

But at least, you can have some comments to make regarding these insane infractions ? Are they justified? Are they just sheer mischief ? Or are these infractions work of a mad and intoxicated man of no consequence? As a champion of fairness and justice here in this forum, it will help a great deal if you could very kindly say your piece. You can help me by saying something without Mr Sam Leong doing anything to salvage the victim from being banished soon.

Your words and comments are highly respectful and influential here I must admit. Thank you. Please help me.

The part in red is I think not correct. I can see that you have 60 infraction points but are still posting. Can you please enlighten me on this?

I would suggest to LeongSam to ban anyone who has received 20 infractions from at least three different nicks for 48 hours.

 

[winnipegjets]

no since when has anyone ever said that? Now you are making up rubbish.

If my recollection is incorrect, I tender my apology for accusing you a racist.

 

[kopiuncle]

The part in red is I think not correct. I can see that you have 60 infraction points but are still posting. Can you please enlighten me on this?

I would suggest to LeongSam to ban anyone who has received 20 infractions from at least three different nicks to be banned for 48 hours.

I think the best person to answer your question is Mr Leong himself.

As a man of fairness and justice, do you think my 25 infractions and 60 demerit points are justified ? I know I will be banished soon. Please enlighten me before I go to prison. Is the mad man justified in infracting almost all my postings ? Am I rude? Am I spamming ? Am I stupid and ignorant ? Thank you. Sorry to bother you.

 

[Jah_rastafar_I]

Its not normal to have 10 officers restraining an inmate.. Our Prison staff practised a restraining method when dealing with violent inmates, the same method practised by their UK and US counterparts..

This is necessary when it comes to dealing with people like Dinesh.. 2 or 3 officers should be enough to handle him but the number of officers involved in restraining him showed that the Mama could have been very very aggressive and thus more officers were needed to subdue him..

This is how the PAP government tells it. And we are expected to believe it?
To minimize payout, the PAP government has to paint the victim in the worst light. And it is doing a great job as lots of sinkees are just taking it in hooks, lines and sinkers.

zeddy you probably indirectly got called pap doggy. This fucker is now putting a spin on things. If the PAP is really SOOO corrupt then ng boon gay wouldn't have even been arrested all those rich famous men wouldn't have been charged with sex with an underaged girl.

Zeddy's description makes a lot of sense here. Why would they send in 10 officers unless the inmate was super violent.

 

[winnipegjets]

Because like zeddy mentioned if something like that occured the wardens would be prosecuted.

In this case, the abuse went awry and the inmate died. So, the warden was prosecuted and given a fine of $10k, an amount that was less than his pay! Where's the deterrence?

many prisoners got abused if you read zeddy's account and they got justice served for them. Following your stupid logic they should all repoen their cases and demand even more compensation and etc etc. Yup someone working in prisons mentioned the reason why dinesh attacked the warden and he even knows the warden's name it had nothing to do with insulting his family etc this shit skin acted like a typical skin and got offended over a small thing and definitely deserved it.

I can't argue with someone who claims he has the inside knowledge.

You moron. The shane todd case is harder to solve. In this case it's pretty straightforward.

What baloney!
How is this case straightforward? An inmate died ...an the government issues a statement claiming that he was the instigator. If you accept the government bs as straightforward, I rest my case. You expect the government that has to pay compensation to admit that its employees abuse the inmate? You that dumb? I think not.

 

[Jah_rastafar_I]

In this case, the abuse went awry and the inmate died. So, the warden was prosecuted and given a fine of $10k, an amount that was less than his pay! Where's the deterrence?


I can't argue with someone who claims he has the inside knowledge.








What baloney!
How is this case straightforward? An inmate died ...an the government issues a statement claiming that he was the instigator. If you accept the government bs as straightforward, I rest my case. You expect the government that has to pay compensation to admit that its employees abuse the inmate? You that dumb? I think not.

As long as prisoners behave themselves they won't get punished by the warden.


If you claim you cannot argue why do u keep on coming back?

This case is straightforward now you are making up rubbish.

 

[WongMengMeng]

I think the best person to answer your question is Mr Leong himself.

As a man of fairness and justice, do you think my 25 infractions and 60 demerit points are justified ? I know I will be banished soon. Please enlighten me before I go to prison. Is the mad man justified in infracting almost all my postings ? Am I rude? Am I spamming ? Am I stupid and ignorant ? Thank you. Sorry to bother you.

That's why I say you should take all your grievances to Mr Leong himself. It is rude of me, who is nothing more than a guest in this forum, to say this and say that. After all, having been zapped into oblivion on 2 occasions by your PAP IB, I had to ask him for protection. Mr Leong is fair, he even says some good words of your PAP when he sees that the forum is getting too lop sided. Your team should really thank him.

If one keeps repeating the same thing over and over again, I think it is spam, but I only come into this forum occasionally so can't say for sure if it applies in your case. Cheers, over and out.

 

[kopiuncle]

That's why I say you should take all your grievances to Mr Leong himself. It is rude of me, who is nothing more than a guest in this forum, to say this and say that. After all, having been zapped into oblivion on 2 occasions by your PAP IB, I had to ask him for protection. Mr Leong is fair, he even says some good words of your PAP when he sees that the forum is getting too lop sided. Your team should really thank him.

If one keeps repeating the same thing over and over again, I think it is spam, but I only come into this forum occasionally so can't say for sure if it applies in your case. Cheers, over and out.

Thank you.

Ooops Sir, just one last thing before we say good-nite, you still got me wrong on (1) and (2)...over and out.

 

[winnipegjets]

As long as prisoners behave themselves they won't get punished by the warden.

This is as good as stating that you pay civil servants high salaries, they won't be corrupt.

If you claim you cannot argue why do u keep on coming back?

You can't even get the obvious insinuation?

This case is straightforward now you are making up rubbish.

If you take the PAP crap, of course it is straightforward. BUT, there is a reason for them to make the case out as it is ...to reduce compensation. There is obvious conflict of interest and you swallow everything the government says.

The SPF investigation concluded that Shane Todd committed suicide. Isn't that straightforward?

 

[oratedar]

The prison wardens probably used too much force and kill him accidentally.

This act most probably saved a whole lot others who this neh will harm if he gets out. In my opinion his death is not a lost to the society.

 

[Jah_rastafar_I]

This is as good as stating that you pay civil servants high salaries, they won't be corrupt.

ROFL trying to really politicize this thread. It won't work. You're trying to make it seem to ppl like oh pap ministers are paid high salaries and well they are corrupt in some way which is the same as the prison wardens bullying prisoners. Sounds too fucking stupid and only ppl like you would make up rubbish like that.

You can't even get the obvious insinuation?

insinuation that you are a stubborn POS that refuses to listen to reason?

If you take the PAP crap, of course it is straightforward. BUT, there is a reason for them to make the case out as it is ...to reduce compensation. There is obvious conflict of interest and you swallow everything the government says.

The SPF investigation concluded that Shane Todd committed suicide. Isn't that straightforward?

Look at you trying your darn best to now twist it so that that shane todd case isn't actually complicated while this case is.

You really are capable of anything. Very good twisty turner you are btw.