France Ben Arfa
Excellent!!!!
France Ben Arfa
effective football win the game not just passing around.I prefer watching Real Madrid to Barcelona and Norwich to Swansea.
What u referred to as possession fundamentalist (?) doesn't make football better imo.
No cutting edge, pass backwards, sideways, slighty forward, pass back, sian.......................
imho, replace Erva with Clichy is a better choice.France (4-2-3-1): Lloris, Debuchy, Rami, Mexès, Clichy, Ribéry, Nasri, M'Vila, Diarra, Ben Arfa, Benzema
I prefer watching Real Madrid to Barcelona and Norwich to Swansea.
What u referred to as possession fundamentalist (?) doesn't make football better imo.
No cutting edge, pass backwards, sideways, slighty forward, pass back, sian.......................
effective football win the game not just passing around.
so what you have made the most passes? claps?
hahaha
Indeed. he was nowhere to be seen on the pitch. hahahaBtw Elmander deserves to be dropped, he had a terrible game against England.
What I was referring to as being absurd originally was forummer freedalas' description of how Thomas Muller tried to miss but scored and pretending to celebrate after he scored in the champions league final. Post #779 is you are interested.
Then, I also described his comment that the "heaven's dictate that england will win euro 2012" as being absurd.
Note that I have never said that match fixing discussions or the fact that england might actually win euro 2012 are absurd.
I did not watch the game on CL Final. My understandings for #779 and #781 together with #964, #967 and #1080 of the threads are;
Your perception of the mentioned striker was not how the other member has described.
From his perspectives, he viewed it as a reaction from an unintentional goal cos the match is fixed, to you not, as you view it not possible at this level of competition. The whole match fixing talk for this level was absurd to you.
See what I mean?
It's not only boring. It's inefficient too. Like I've said before, it's akin to Usain Bolt running blindfolded. Sure, he'll most probably outrun most of us. And the herds would hail blindfolded running as the best way to win races. But imagine how much faster he would be had he not blindfolded himself.
That's the most ridiculous analogy I have ever heard. What nonsense! Absolutely no connection between the two.
I think England might concede tonight. Devic will give the English defence a few headaches with his movement.
You think there's no similarity between blindfolding oneself in a race and slowing down an attack to allow opposing defenders to organise themselves?
The main reason I view it as not possible is not so much because of the level of competition.
The main reason is if he was trying to fix the match, he needn't even bother to get into that position to score the goal.
No one would have been the wiser if he had just run a little slower.
What sort of analysis is that? Absolute no-brainers. Even the ah peks at the coffeeshop who can't speak English can come up with better insights than these motherhood statements of yours.
If you don't respect other's analysis, you expect others to do so to you?