That joker is a typical balless sinkie. Kept saying he's here for friendly discussions but he just wouldn't let go without making a few sniping remarks here and there. Wanna fight but fear bloodshed. Just look at the caveats in all his predictions. He can never be wrong cuz he's got his arse covered for all eventualities. He thinks his warped understanding of logical analysis gives him a right to misrepresent my position. He thinks Ukraine is a better footballing team than England. Therefore, my logical analysis must somehow be congruent with his so called "logic". If Ukraine doesn't win, all logical analysis will be rendered useless. We must accept the axioms of his as universal and unequivocal without him having to prove why Ukraine plays the better football than England or how "the stars have chosen England to win the tournament". No evidence, no logic. All we have is the circular fallacy that what he said is right because what he said is right. He thinks my wrong predictions undermine my case, as though perfection exists in this world. If the meteorologists didn't predict rain for a particular day, that's because, according to freedalas, logic and empiricism are unreliable and that meteorologists are useless. Just because my predictions aren't perfect doesn't mean logic is worthless. If he sees a weak person failing to chop down a tree with an axe, he would probably conclude that axes can't be used to chop down trees. I admit it, I'm that weak person with the axe. But the problem isn't the logical method that I rely on but my failure to use it to my advantage. Having said that, I challenge him to find me a single person here who predicted Spain 4-0 Ireland as I did. Find me someone here who predicted that the peacock would score and that the Dutch would be defeated outright by the Portuguese when no one here dares to commit to a 3rd defeat for Holland.
