• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Ms Lo Hwei Yen

Nobody is claiming with certainty what would have happened. You are missing the entire point. The point is what went through LHL's mind when he made the decision to condemn.

I don't know what goes on in LHL mind, but I do know what those terrorist have in their mind. To kill and be killed.
 
And you would know all that DURING the hostage crisis? Next time another crisis occurs, I suggest you offer your pearls of wisdom as well. Also, next time you get robbed at knifepoint, do read your wonderful speeches to the robber as well, since there's also no hope anyway. You can tell just by looking, after all, that anyone who shows some form of murderous intent is completely out to kill you. You seem to like getting blood on your hands.

hahaha..

good retort.
 
Didn't you watch the documentary? It was so clear that they were there to kill everyone and then kill themselves to make a statement.

This is the funniest part. You don't seem to get it, so let me try to explain in your terms.

Sure, if LHL had sat down and watched a documentary about the hostage crisis during the crisis itself, and he had divine and perfect information that there is 0% chance of rescue no matter what he did or did not do, then perhaps he could make the statements. However, seeing as it would have required time travel, which as far as I know has not been invented, the most prudent thing would have been to just shut up.
 
the terrorists were hellbent on killing hostages. they had no clue what some hotshot prime ministers from some wannabe first world countries were saying. it was not like they were surfing the web or listening to the five o'clock news when they were holed up in a stairwell with hostages, shooting victims in haste, thinking with their guns and fighting for their goddamn arselives. sheesh.
 
Your assumption that all hostages are killed once terrorists take over is completely wrong. If your assumption is correct, we won't have PrataMan as our Elected President today.

PrataMan volunteered to be a hostage in the 1973 Laju incident. He enjoyed a free plane ride. The original hostagers are still alive. I mean they may be dead from cancer, heart attacks, strokes, old age whatever. But they were not killed onboard in 1973. I am 100% sure not ALL hostages were sent to the mortuaries for ALL terrorist cases.

Again, not all terrorist are the same. For these Muslim terrorist, they are not interested in living. They are all waiting to go to heaven for killing non-Muslim. That is different from prataman's hostage takers. Watch the documentary and you will know what kind of terrorist these idiots are.
 
the terrorists were hellbent on killing hostages. they had no clue what some hotshot prime ministers from some wannabe first world countries were saying. it was not like they were surfing the web or listening to the five o'clock news when they were holed up in a stairwell with hostages, shooting victims in haste, thinking with their guns and fighting for their goddamn arselives. sheesh.

you have underrated and misjudged the terrorists, just like LHL
 
the terrorists were hellbent on killing hostages. they had no clue what some hotshot prime ministers from some wannabe first world countries were saying. it was not like they were surfing the web or listening to the five o'clock news when they were holed up in a stairwell with hostages, shooting victims in haste, thinking with their guns and fighting for their goddamn arselives. sheesh.

FINALLY! Someone here smart enough to understand this.
 
This is the funniest part. You don't seem to get it, so let me try to explain in your terms.

Sure, if LHL had sat down and watched a documentary about the hostage crisis during the crisis itself, and he had divine and perfect information that there is 0% chance of rescue no matter what he did or did not do, then perhaps he could make the statements. However, seeing as it would have required time travel, which as far as I know has not been invented, the most prudent thing would have been to just shut up.

Well said...but it seems that Devil Within doesnt understand what we r saying...
 
you have underrated and misjudged the terrorists, just like LHL

Next time when you meet the self-destruct Muslim terrorist in your plane you are flying, say hello and tell them to let you go just because you are a Muslim.
 
I don't know what goes on in LHL mind, but I do know what those terrorist have in their mind. To kill and be killed.

You said you know their minds.

But i think you may not know.

Wisdom is not to be too cock sure abt what you think you know
 
the terrorists were hellbent on killing hostages. they had no clue what some hotshot prime ministers from some wannabe first world countries were saying. it was not like they were surfing the web or listening to the five o'clock news when they were holed up in a stairwell with hostages, shooting victims in haste, thinking with their guns and fighting for their goddamn arselives. sheesh.

In fact, that is exactly what they did - watched the news coverage of the rescue operation itself, which was criticized for taking away the element of surprise of the resucers. Clearly you did not follow the crisis. They were in a bloody luxury hotel that was connected to the world. If you didn't know what they were or weren't doing, why take chances? This doesn't even require perfect hindsight.
 
This is the funniest part. You don't seem to get it, so let me try to explain in your terms.

Sure, if LHL had sat down and watched a documentary about the hostage crisis during the crisis itself, and he had divine and perfect information that there is 0% chance of rescue no matter what he did or did not do, then perhaps he could make the statements. However, seeing as it would have required time travel, which as far as I know has not been invented, the most prudent thing would have been to just shut up.

If you understand the mindset of these fuckup Muslim terrorist, you would know that no amount of words you say or don't say will stop them from killing non-Muslim.
 
Next time when you meet the self-destruct Muslim terrorist in your plane you are flying, say hello and tell them to let you go just because you are a Muslim.

hahaha..thank you for your advice. but i know that I wont do anything to irritate and aggravate an angry and irrational terrorist
 
You said you know their minds.

But i think you may not know.

Wisdom is not to be too cock sure abt what you think you know

If one think that he/she can go to heaven for killing infidels, there is nothing smart to say about them. Looks to me you are more delusional than these fuck heads to think that they have brains in them.
 
you have underrated and misjudged the terrorists, just like LHL

oh shit. as if you know so much about dealing with suicidal jihadists. when they launch any mission, they have already considered themselves dead. there's no negotiation, no debates, no u-turns, nor regrets.
 
Again, not all terrorist are the same. For these Muslim terrorist, they are not interested in living. They are all waiting to go to heaven for killing non-Muslim. That is different from prataman's hostage takers. Watch the documentary and you will know what kind of terrorist these idiots are.

From the little I know of terrorism, I am aware that when it comes to negotiations with terrorists (with hostages of course), the main strategy is to play for time and more time.

Play for time and more time to collect more info/intel, explore options, get your commandos to rehearse the rescue part, try and get release of 1 or 2 hostages to better size up the situation (number of terrorists, positions, weapons etc), allow for some compromise etc. Always engage them. Please them if you have to. If they want women, send them women!!!

But, NEVER, NEVER EVER AGITATE THEM. Agitate them includes condemning their act of terrorism, immediately denying them their requests even if the request is an atrocious one etc.

We may never agree but it is alright. I respect your views even though I don't agree with them. All that is needed is just a few cases whereby Muslim terrorists release their hostages and your stand will go down the drain.
 
Don't get too happy. He was making a completely different (and still wrong) point from yours. The fact that you can't tell the difference reveals much about you.

On the contrary, he know for a fact that those terrorist are there to kill no matter who say what or don't say what.
 
Back
Top