You are entitled to think that winning or losing has nothing to do with maturity. But that serves the purpose if it acts as an incentive for people who tend not to put up honest, solid views and get the facts correct.
If ppl like you or your fellow opposition supporters can put up solid view, honest facts, then i would have seen a great comparisons long ago about the pros n cons between PAP n WP. Like what you mentioned in your below statement, "we haven't discussed on how far WP can bring SG forward" already sumps up all the things that have been said.
Of course. We haven't discussed on how far WP can bring forward. So now we are discussing, I can say WP can bring Singapore forward like the PAP, just not exactly the same direction. They will peg housing prices to salaries and nationalize the transport system, things that I think will make Singapore a better place.
If WP can bring SG forward in another direction, then name it ot tell us with your honest, solid views n facts. I'm on all ears n eyes. Pegging housing estate to salaries??? You mean lowering HDB flats to the price of 20 years back?? You think is possible?
Pardon me, you mean the transport system now are not nationalize enough??? Maybe i have a different understanding on what you wrote but i wouldn't jump to conclusion. Also , you mean SG is not a better place now??? Why dun you make a trip to Egypt now n tried it out..
I only mentioned one word which any man on the street will agree it is not correctly used. You mean one word makes one an English Teacher? You mean every man on the street is an English Teacher? Yes, continue your personal attacks then.
If you understands, not to mention writing in a forum but even sometimes when we write emails there is bound to be typo error or mistakes. For formal email or letters, i'll definitely read it twice n check for mistakes before sending it out but not for forum. By trying to correct others english grammar or vocab in a forum what are you trying to prove?
I already answered. In any case, one wonders if you have something against having an upper hand because you know you are on flimsy ground. I wasn't the one who said I can analyst and write well.
To be honest, coming into this forum for 2 weeks or so actually i saw many like what you say, "they are on flimsy ground"... They don't have the resources to leave, they can't do anything to change the current govt, or they can do are to hide behind a PC and swear to the 9th heaven... poomer, escher, crane, etc.... very good example!!!
So if both sides use, why are you complaining so much about opposition supporters? And still say no double standards.
YOu're the one complaining about "personal attacks", not me... If you're so clear in what you're writing n reading which you've pretended.... You should have seen that you're the one who brought up this topic n i didn't claimed that PAP supporters are polite... So where does my double standard come from??? I merely pointed out to you that "personal attacks" are also being done by pro-opposition supporters only... Don't even have the guts to admit???
It's just 7 posts above yours and you need people to direct? One wonders if that is akin to disingenuous or laziness.
