Serious Traitor Yang Challenges Good Ministers Shan And Vivian To Sue Him In UK! Bayi Lawyer Pondering About Mareva Injunction Like Against Wanker Tang!

[tanwahtiu]

He's doing well in UK as a practising lawyer.

Ok. Which type? Criminal or conveyancing?

 

[batman1]

Wah Tiu older or
Wah Piow older ?

I think TWP is older.

 

[batman1]

Ok. Which type? Criminal or conveyancing?

Immigration.

 

[tanwahtiu]

Do they have to face SAF martial law? Rank and file thing...

Do they have to surrender their SAF badge and uniform under this situation...

What if war is at the door step now?

@Papsmearer

 

[CoffeeAhSoh]

Do they have to face SAF martial law? Rank and file thing...

Do they have to surrender their SAF badge and uniform under this situation...

What is war is at the door step now?

@Papsmearer

you mean like Colonel Nathan R. Jessup ?
.

 

[LexLuthor]

.

LHY 要敢说敢做，敢做敢当。

He must consider the line of arguments he will be taking in the future if the defamation suit becomes real.

Whether or not he meant that they were corrupt is irrelevant (to whether or not the statement is defamatory) because the test is objective. It's how other people will interpret his statement that matters. And because we don't have jury trial, it's the judge who will play the role of the objective reasonable man in the street. If the statement is proven to be defamatory, and if the Court believes that LHY didn't mean to say they were corrupt, that would only be relevant to the size of the damages.

It's not difficult for the Black Mambas to prove that LHY was alluding to corruption by digging up all his past posts. Is LHY going to do a Pritam by openly declaring that there was no corruption or wrongdoing in the matter ? You see, he is very close to being "checkmate" by the Black Mambas liao.

If he is prepared to fight the Black Mambas in Court, then from now on he must begin to phrase all his comments in the context of "fair comment on a matter of public interest" rather than "I did not mean this or that." The latter will only make him look like a humchee.

 

[eatshitndie]

Singapore has an extradition treaty with UK, with regards to criminals whom committed crimes, even as minor as not paying parking ticket fines. A criminal is a criminal, in lands that are RULED by LAWS.

For Mr LSY, he had made presumably false accusations to that of no less than ELECTED legislators by majority citizens vote & are thoughtfully selected Cabinet Ministers to administer to our Country. Regardless if he is residing in Austria or Zimbabwe, he STILLS hold Singapore CITIZENSHIP, a PRIVILEDGED status as one of us common citizens & are expected to be courageous to uphold our comments, especially over political matters of National State.

May the UK govt extradite him back to Singapore. Singapore still follows the established Common Laws of UK, where no citizen is denied of a fair trial & legal representation.

Let him, who is a son of one of our great Founders of Singapore, explain his position as a fellow citizen, without fear or favor, his comments that he thought free to expressed, & then let our trusted Judiciary & citizens decide if he had defamed, or mistakenly/deliberately made mistakes of presumption, to exonerate himself & uphold his standing amongst peers & citizens.

first know the difference between a crime and a civil lawsuit. if your gf claims that you’re wearing a skirt, it’s not a crime but you can sue her for slander.

 

[rotiprata]

He's your bro tanwahpiow. 555

 

[tanwahtiu]

LHY 要敢说敢做，敢做敢当。

He must consider the line of arguments he will be taking in the future if the defamation suit becomes real.

Whether or not he meant that they were corrupt is irrelevant (to whether or not the statement is defamatory) because the test is objective. It's how other people will interpret his statement that matters. And because we don't have jury trial, it's the judge who will play the role of the objective reasonable man in the street. If the statement is proven to be defamatory, and if the Court believes that LHY didn't mean to say they were corrupt, that would only be relevant to the size of the damages.

It's not difficult for the Black Mambas to prove that LHY was alluding to corruption by digging up all his past posts. Is LHY going to do a Pritam by openly declaring that there was no corruption or wrongdoing in the matter ? You see, he is very close to being "checkmate" by the Black Mambas liao.

If he is prepared to fight the Black Mambas in Court, then from now on he must begin to phrase all his comments in the context of "fair comment on a matter of public interest" rather than "I did not mean this or that."

Wo... you are champ....

Yang shd use the narration method... first party, 2nd party 3rd party....

First party is I. Refrain ....

2nd party is you.

3rd party is we, they...

Say 2nd party point to the speaker You( means him) .... and judge will have different opinions.... when you use you think, you do, sooner the listener think your are talking about him and immersed into the story line.... the judge may think you are talking about him, or the plaintiff lawyer...

Say we or they means hear from the ground, ramble, or gossip or hearsay.... arrow any how shoot....

明抢易躲 暗箭难防...

 

[rotiprata]

Wh
Who is he? Death or alive one?

he's the one who gave LHY's old man sleepless nights n nightmares..

 

[rotiprata]

Ok. Which type? Criminal or conveyancing?

u should ask those sinkies who wish to keng NS... in camp training to seek TWP advice

 

[rotiprata]

Immigration.

 

[tanwahtiu]

Loong and Yang problem is they are brought up like in a cubic cabin... sleep before 10 pm. Wake up maids dress them and just wait to served breakfast lunch dinner.

Whereas poor peasant like us has to fight here there everywhere and anytime to survive at home or outside...

危险 crisis.. in danger there is opportunity also... we create danger to get opportunity.... real sad case... 不得已 患乱出英雄...

We use 2nd and 3rd narration all the time in speeches to put the words into the other mouth... or many people mouth....

Save money mah... no Court case...

 

[Peter Ahmad Muniandy Wong]

Let's ALL calm down & be rational.

So far, it had only been a war of words. Our Courts had seen no applications made to sue Mr. LSY. There really is no need to upscale the rhetoric, more so when there are FAR MORE urgent matters to deal in Singapore - rising food & medical costs, BTO concerns, climate change, leadership handover, etc, etc. Equally, Mr LSY is now a private citizen, but still a son of our revered founding father the late Mr LKY, who is now residing outside Singapore for fear of responding to our Court's findings over his matter of honesty in the handling of his father's Will.

As he is living outside, he presumed he is unanswerable to any Court charges or requests for assistance into investigations in Singapore. He does not realize that if our govt wishes to pursue matters of criminal dishonesty or civil charges, it DOES have the LEGAL ability to do so, wherever he hides in. The insignificant nobody me thanks him for his past years of service to our country, good or bad with mistakes made, as I believe he only acted out in presumed good faith as no mortal is perfect & hopes he live a fruitful life. He needs not respond anymore & live a quiet life instead.

However, he chose to respond, even worse, with challenges amounting to defamation to our ELECTED officials & cast doubts upon our judiciary & system of governance of which he was a member till he had been found out to be dishonest in his dealing, over a private matter & worse, made a mountain out of a mole hill. It did not stop there. He wants to cast aspersion upon our ministers WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE, but only based upon hearsay from others & mainstream media whom EQUALLY did not support their accusations with ANY EVIDENCE.

He had been respected by many as a General in our Military. He had undeniably serve our country well, or as best as he could. But with accusations upon our leadership WITHOUT any evidences, he had only proven that it is a personal vendetta against OUR elected officials & govt, for his own selfish interests instead of for the welfare of our citizens.

If he truly is working on behalf of Singapore & citizens, that his father had worked tirelessly for, then he is welcomed back to face criticisms courageously in any form, as his father did, & PROVE WITH EVIDENCES that indeed there had been wrong doings within the govt, If not, then I wish him all the best to live a quiet life, & learn to control his presumed unsubstantiated misgivings in life.

Hark! Pray tell, thine tongue waxes excessive, akin to an overzealous brook, ne'er ceasing its babble. Verily, 'tis as if thou art a fervent minstrel, each word a song upon thine lips, yet lacking the sweet harmony that doth delight the ear. Thou dost not pause to inhale the very air which sustaineth thee, but fillest it instead with ceaseless prattle.

Oh, how thy verbosity doth resemble a tempest, gathering force and fury, drowning all who seeketh respite from the deluge of thy words. Thy discourse knows no bounds, nor restraint, nor care for those who long for a moment of tranquil reprieve.

If only thy speech were a garden of delicate roses, where each word bloomed with purpose and grace, but alas, 'tis a wild thicket, where meaning is lost amidst the tangled vines of thy loquaciousness.

Thine endless tales do wear upon the patience of the listener, as an unforgiving wind upon a frayed sail. Like a fountain that runneth amok, thou dost flood the ears of thy company with a torrent of trivialities.

Pray, ponder the virtue of brevity, for in fewer words may lie greater wisdom. Let thine utterances be akin to a fine tapestry, woven with care and precision, not a haphazard patchwork of phrases.

In sooth, the silence between the notes oft carries more significance than the notes themselves, and likewise, a moment of thoughtful silence can enrich thy discourse far beyond the bounds of thy constant prating.

Thus, take heed and spare thy listeners the plight of enduring endless verbosity. For as Shakespeare himself did say, "Give thy thoughts no tongue," and in doing so, thou mayest find a more captive and appreciative audience.

 

[Hypocrite-The]

'Sue me in the UK': Lee Hsien Yang claims Shanmugam & Vivian wrong to accuse him of making false Ridout Road allegations
Shanmugam and Vivian asked Lee to "apologise, withdraw his allegations and pay damages", if not they will sue him.

Hannah Martens |


July 30, 2023, 11:28 AM



Mothership WhatsApp bannerMothership Telegram banner
Lee Hsien Yang has responded to Minister for Home Affairs and Law K Shanmugam and Minister for Foreign Affairs Vivian Balakrishnan's announcement that they intend to sue him over false Ridout Road allegations.

Lee, who is the brother of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, claimed that both ministers were wrong about what he said, and invited them to sue him in the UK.

What Lee Hsien Yang said
Lee wrote in a Facebook post on Jul. 23 that the two ministers have "leased state-owned mansions from the agency that one of them controls, felling trees and getting state-sponsored renovations".

This led to Lee being issued a correction direction under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) for that post.

Lee complied with the POFMA order.

However, on Jul. 25, Lee put up another Facebook post, saying he stood by his words, despite the POFMA order.

"I stand by what I said. The POFMA notice is misleading. Read my actual post and compare what was said to what the notice claims I said," Lee said.

He also posted the same thing in the comment section of his Jul. 23 post.

What Shanmugam and Vivian said
On Jul. 27, both Vivian and Shanmugam posted on Facebook, stating that Lee accused both ministers of "acting corruptly and for personal gain by having Singapore Land Authority (“SLA”) give us preferential treatment by illegally felling trees without approval, and also having SLA pay for renovations to 26 and 31 Ridout Road. These allegations are false."

According to the Ministry of Law on government fact-checker site Factually, the identity of the tenants had no bearing on the decision on the works to be carried out on the properties.

The ministry said that most of the costs incurred for 26 and 31 Ridout Road were for works that external consultants determined were necessary.

The ministry also highlighted that Lee's post omitted information about how the works were done in accordance with Singapore Land Authority's (SLA) practice and were assessed to be necessary in the circumstances.

The ministers asked that Lee "apologise, withdraw his allegations and pay damages which [they] will donate to charity".

If not, they will sue him.

Lee disputed what Vivian and Shanmugam said
On Jul. 29, Lee claimed in a new Facebook post that his post on Jul. 23 did not "assert that Shanmugam and V Balakrishnan acted corruptly or for personal gain" regarding 26 and 31 Ridout Road.

"Shanmugam and V Balakrishnan are wrong about what I said.

My post did not assert that Shanmugam and V Balakrishnan acted corruptly or for personal gain by having SLA give them preferential treatment by illegally felling trees without approval and also having SLA pay for renovations for them.

My post simply stated facts that were already widely published in the Singapore and international media."

Lee then concluded his post was made in the UK.

"If K Shanmugam and V Balakrishnan believe that they have a real case, then they should sue me in the UK."


Screenshot via Lee Hsien Yang/Facebook
Top photos via K Shanmugam, Vivian Balakrishnan & People's Progress Party/Facebook


If you like what you read, follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Telegram to get the latest updates.

 

[tanwahtiu]

Hark! Pray tell, thine tongue waxes excessive, akin to an overzealous brook, ne'er ceasing its babble. Verily, 'tis as if thou art a fervent minstrel, each word a song upon thine lips, yet lacking the sweet harmony that doth delight the ear. Thou dost not pause to inhale the very air which sustaineth thee, but fillest it instead with ceaseless prattle.

Oh, how thy verbosity doth resemble a tempest, gathering force and fury, drowning all who seeketh respite from the deluge of thy words. Thy discourse knows no bounds, nor restraint, nor care for those who long for a moment of tranquil reprieve.

If only thy speech were a garden of delicate roses, where each word bloomed with purpose and grace, but alas, 'tis a wild thicket, where meaning is lost amidst the tangled vines of thy loquaciousness.

Thine endless tales do wear upon the patience of the listener, as an unforgiving wind upon a frayed sail. Like a fountain that runneth amok, thou dost flood the ears of thy company with a torrent of trivialities.

Pray, ponder the virtue of brevity, for in fewer words may lie greater wisdom. Let thine utterances be akin to a fine tapestry, woven with care and precision, not a haphazard patchwork of phrases.

In sooth, the silence between the notes oft carries more significance than the notes themselves, and likewise, a moment of thoughtful silence can enrich thy discourse far beyond the bounds of thy constant prating.

Thus, take heed and spare thy listeners the plight of enduring endless verbosity. For as Shakespeare himself did say, "Give thy thoughts no tongue," and in doing so, thou mayest find a more captive and appreciative audience.

Great... superb.... speakth like Shakespeare...

 

[JohnTan]

@JohnTan is thw traior work with CCP and CECA.

How can I be a traitor? I'm a grassroots leader. We work directly with the people of Singapore.

 

[JohnTan]

Tiagong , lawyers for KS and VB are back in Office today a Sunday.

Indeed, they believe they have a real case.

Of course they do. The wicked Yang has defamed two good ministers. Yang will not be allowed to get away scot free just because he made the libelous post from UK. Our judge can still freeze all of his worldwide assets with a Mareva Injunction. Their bayi lawyers are looking into it.

 

[Eisenhut]

LHY 要敢说敢做，敢做敢当。

He must consider the line of arguments he will be taking in the future if the defamation suit becomes real.

Whether or not he meant that they were corrupt is irrelevant (to whether or not the statement is defamatory) because the test is objective. It's how other people will interpret his statement that matters. And because we don't have jury trial, it's the judge who will play the role of the objective reasonable man in the street. If the statement is proven to be defamatory, and if the Court believes that LHY didn't mean to say they were corrupt, that would only be relevant to the size of the damages.

It's not difficult for the Black Mambas to prove that LHY was alluding to corruption by digging up all his past posts. Is LHY going to do a Pritam by openly declaring that there was no corruption or wrongdoing in the matter ? You see, he is very close to being "checkmate" by the Black Mambas liao.

If he is prepared to fight the Black Mambas in Court, then from now on he must begin to phrase all his comments in the context of "fair comment on a matter of public interest" rather than "I did not mean this or that." The latter will only make him look like a humchee.

How can he be check mate by Black mambas when the jury in AMDKland sympathise with LHY???

 

[tanwahtiu]

Of course they do. The wicked Yang has defamed two good ministers. Yang will not be allowed to get away scot free just because he made the libelous post from UK. Our judge can still freeze all of his worldwide assets with a Mareva Injunction. Their bayi lawyers are looking into it.

Thanks for the Mareva Injunction... it works both ways...

I wan to claim for my birth right white fair skin complexion damaged by PAP NSF liability.... never warn us we are expected to get burn in hot scorching sun in the 80°N of Equator....

My sisters are white fair skin complexion type and shocked to see my turned dark brown after return home from BMT... she feels sorry for me saying I was such a 帅哥 type white fair skin complexion loved by my sisters.

Sad. They cried for me...