• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Traitor Yang Challenges Good Ministers Shan And Vivian To Sue Him In UK! Bayi Lawyer Pondering About Mareva Injunction Like Against Wanker Tang!

Prince Yang explain liao.... It is a miscommunication
It is no defence to say the words are, if taken literally, true or do not defame the claimant, if a reasonable person is capable of reading between the lines and drawing any logical conclusions from the words or other representation. :rolleyes:
 
Defamation case can counter sue back... his spouse can sue the plaintiff for her reputation which affect her standing and her company she worked in or for.....

Like that... play ping pong game...
 
It is no defence to say the words are, if taken literally, true or do not defame the claimant, if a reasonable person is capable of reading between the lines and drawing any logical conclusions from the words or other representation. :rolleyes:
Can appeal again, go for 2nd dipping and legal fees up upu up and take another few years to open the case again....

By this time both older and hit 70s no stamina left.... appeal case open he report sick stomach..... postpone again... legal fees up upu up sky high...

this is English law... Georgian style... Only one party can be right...

.... go to the village law... where chief head rules the law.... He knows that both parties lies... human nature to defend himself in a crisis.....

So come half way.... just buy the Chief a feast and everyone in the village are invited for the feast...
 
Last edited:
Can appeal again, go for 2nd dipping and legal fees up upu up and take another few years to open the case again....

By this time both older and hit 70s no stamina left.... appeal case open he report sick stomach..... postpone again... legal fees up upu up sky high...

this is English law... Georgian style... Only one party can be right...

.... go to the village law... where chief head rules the law.... He knows that both parties lies... human nature to defend himself in a crisis.....

So come half way.... just buy the Chief a feast and everyone in the village are invited for the feast...
If a judgment has been entered against you, you must deposit the judgment debt in the Court before you are allowed to appeal. And the judgment debt carries an interest from the date the judgment was awarded at the Court of First Instance.
 
If a judgment has been entered against you, you must deposit the judgment debt in the Court before you are allowed to appeal. And the judgment debt carries an interest from the date the judgment was awarded at the Court of First Instance.
Says who... if you lose this time Court can double the sentence or fine...
 
Shanmugam got no balls to sue whether in SG or UK. His ownself clear ownself in parliament means sweet fuck all in the courts.

In the courts everything starts from scratch. All evidence will be obtained and everything needs to be put in open. His HP auto deletes nonsense won't fly.
 
Its time for Singapore's unparalleled, incorruptible judicial system to shine on international stage by bringing the corruption allegation to UK court and let them be scrutinised by International Law, put to bed once for all the suspicion of Kangaroo Court.
 
Says who... if you lose this time Court can double the sentence or fine...
That is why you pay to the Court first, not to the Plaintiff. If the judgment is enhanced and the Defendant is ordered to pay double by the Appellate Court, then the Defendant pays extra. If the judgment is overturned, the Defendant gets his money back from the Court.

The advantage for the Plaintiff is once the judgment debt is paid to the Court (as opposed to the Plaintiff) pending an Appeal, in the event the Plaintiff wins the Appeal, he withdraws the money from the Court. There is no need to go for lengthy enforcement procedures to seize assets and auction.
 
Court will access the case to this 3 things.

1. Frivolous
2. Vendetta
3. Vindictive...

Anyone of this three, the court will throw out the case before it even approved....丢脸 xia suay the court system...
 
Singapore was British colony and our judicial and parliamentary system based in British, even LKY would be happy to let our colonial master decide fate of his son
 
O
That is why you pay to the Court first, not to the Plaintiff. If the judgment is enhanced and the Defendant is ordered to pay double by the Appellate Court, then the Defendant pays extra. If the judgment is overturned, the Defendant gets his money back from the Court.

The advantage for the Plaintiff is once the judgment debt is paid to the Court (as opposed to the Plaintiff) pending an Appeal, in the event the Plaintiff wins the Appeal, he withdraws the money from the Court. There is no need to go for lengthy enforcement procedures to seize assets and auction.
Ok. Different country own law...
 
Its time for Singapore's unparalleled, incorruptible judicial system to shine on international stage by bringing the corruption allegation to UK court and let them be scrutinised by International Law, put to bed once for all the suspicion of Kangaroo Court.
Create a betting pool club...
 
Shanmugam got no balls to sue whether in SG or UK. His ownself clear ownself in parliament means sweet fuck all in the courts.

In the courts everything starts from scratch. All evidence will be obtained and everything needs to be put in open. His HP auto deletes nonsense won't fly.
If mama thamby don't sue, can counter sue him back...
 
If they have the balls to take on Hsien Yang in the UK; I think it's high time that these two Pinkie keleng kia ball-carriers meet their Waterloo.
 
It is no defence to say the words are, if taken literally, true or do not defame the claimant, if a reasonable person is capable of reading between the lines and drawing any logical conclusions from the words or other representation. :rolleyes:
.
 
Back
Top