- Joined
- Apr 18, 2011
- Messages
- 10,723
- Points
- 0
The Workers' Party
"How has the new regime faired? In a 2012 answer to my Parliamentary question, the Ministry revealed that there had been 82 compensation orders made, for the whole of 2011. While 82 was certainly improved from the 31 orders made in 2010, it is very small compared with the number of criminal cases where losses and damage is suffered. It was stated that the prosecutors applied for and obtained the orders in appropriate cases. Does this mean the court relied solely or mainly on the prosecutors to decide this?
I acknowledge that not all criminal cases are automatically suitable for compensation e.g. where civil claims are complicated or disputable, they will need to be separately proved. However, I believe we can consider some changes to increase the likelihood of compensation in straightforward cases, especially for victims who cannot afford to sue separately.
One option is to have a simple joining procedure, as has been done in the Netherlands, allowing victims themselves to attach a civil claim to a criminal case, so that the criminal court can decide on it at the sentencing stage. We could also require police investigators to routinely record a simple victim impact statement, with details of losses and damage sustained, so as to facilitate the court making a compensation order under the CPC later on." - MP Sylvia Lim
COS 2014 Debate: MinLaw – Simplifying Crime Victims’ Civil Claims (MP Sylvia Lim)
wp.sg
By MP for Aljunied GRC, Sylvia Lim [Delivered in Committee of Supply on 5 March 2014] Traditional criminal proceedings are aimed at...
"How has the new regime faired? In a 2012 answer to my Parliamentary question, the Ministry revealed that there had been 82 compensation orders made, for the whole of 2011. While 82 was certainly improved from the 31 orders made in 2010, it is very small compared with the number of criminal cases where losses and damage is suffered. It was stated that the prosecutors applied for and obtained the orders in appropriate cases. Does this mean the court relied solely or mainly on the prosecutors to decide this?
I acknowledge that not all criminal cases are automatically suitable for compensation e.g. where civil claims are complicated or disputable, they will need to be separately proved. However, I believe we can consider some changes to increase the likelihood of compensation in straightforward cases, especially for victims who cannot afford to sue separately.
One option is to have a simple joining procedure, as has been done in the Netherlands, allowing victims themselves to attach a civil claim to a criminal case, so that the criminal court can decide on it at the sentencing stage. We could also require police investigators to routinely record a simple victim impact statement, with details of losses and damage sustained, so as to facilitate the court making a compensation order under the CPC later on." - MP Sylvia Lim
COS 2014 Debate: MinLaw – Simplifying Crime Victims’ Civil Claims (MP Sylvia Lim)
wp.sg
By MP for Aljunied GRC, Sylvia Lim [Delivered in Committee of Supply on 5 March 2014] Traditional criminal proceedings are aimed at...