Like Maxi, I have no wish to be dragged into a fastidious debate.
But I am bemused at the way this ongoing spat between subok & alamaking has returned for round 2. This time poor sleaguepunter also on the receiving end of subok's barbs.
Subok, u r entitled to your views.
But I view your following behaviour reprehensible:-
(1) inability to get over the fact that Cao Cao used his own armies' carcasses to cross battlefields. Too inhuman for your queasy stomach? please, it's war. The way the Red Army used their human waves to clear minefields during Korean War & Sino-Vietnam border war of 1978. Ugly? yes, but PRC soldiers aren't as unwilling as you might imagine.
This act of Cao Cao I noticed is recurrent in your contempt of Cao Cao - I believe , that is your pet thorn, no?
(2) I am also a supporter/admirer of Kong Ming over Cao Cao, but unlike you, I see greys amidst black & white. But to you, Cao is balck black. Hence your unsporting use of Darth Vader analogies. Bad use of labels.
(3) The worst & most unsporting crime is to brand pragmatists as PAPPIE supporter, something convenient & underhand labelling practised by the likes of chaopappypoodle, chauvenist & papsmearer. This is by & large an anti-establishment forum. So pls respect fellow forummers sensitivities here - very uncalled for to relate to 66% & what not.
Finally, I am not here to trade insults with you or make new enemies.
I am making a rare & thankless job of daring to speak my mind & giving a fair 3rd party comment. Just as Bro Sneering Tree has done previously in providing an independent opinion of me when others were heaping abuse & insinuating nonsense about my posts.
We may disagree but hope you take it in the right spirit.
To alamaking & sleaguepunter, let's move on & enjoy our forum experience - even for subok & all.
If you had followed closely, I had already LONG stated, there will be a divide nevertheless and we agree to disagree. My perception of Cao Cao is of my own and IMHO he is NO HERO and the new show rightly or wrongly redeem Cao Cao of being a 奸雄 instead honor him as a 枭雄。
With due respect, I believe unless you are of caliber of Kong Ming, I sincerely believe that you read my postings and did not grasp it.
There will always be people on the other side of the fence and I am not offended that by that. BUT I took offense when they MUST exalt Cao Cao of a status of a HERO in MY dictionary.
Cao Cao was such a person - will use any means to an end, while on the other side of the spectrum Liu Bei will use any ends to end a means.
The equilibrium here is lapses in humanity from Cao Cao is tolerated while however noteworthy "benevolence" of Liu Bei and Zhuge Liang is viewed with stupidity. huh? duh! So for Cao Cao to err he is only being human? and for Liu Bei to show any weakness is inferiority?
If we can allow for Cao Cao deviance ways to be tolerated as "casualty or necessity of war" then why in the same empathy we allow for Liu Bei's "idealistic" advancement of human goodness?
Contributions of Zhuge Liang is seen even till today while Cao Cao's body is still hiding from the great public. Without in-depth understanding of why and when and what in Chinese history, an Emperor, or a Leader, in this case Cao Cao instructions to even hide his own dead body after death, in itself is an answer to the great divide. At least, for this matter, I salute Cao Cao, for he knows his own ends.
The entire episode is so sad as empty and seriously empty vessels making noise with NOTHINg scholastic to contribute other than Cao Cao is my Hero. Proof? Where?
In Chinese history, honored leaders were often consecrated in latter days as saint/demi gods, like Guan Yu, Zhuge Liang, Liu bei, etc but I really cannot say the same for Cao Cao. Why?
Rather than sticking to personal favorite for the sake of exaltation, shows tangible proof TODAY. The living glory of the deceased.
The conclusion can only be ONE - it is either Liu Bei and gang had bride the ENTIRE generation of their time to falsely chronicles their heroic acts or through oral traditions, OR Cao Cao was indeed been vilified in history.
There is nothing wrong with Satanic worship in the worshipers perspective. Likewise there can be NO wrong for idolizing CAo CAo or even Hilter. But it is WRONG when you persist to INSIST your HERO "statutory rights" over others.
And if you are mature enough, detractors in my point of view, conveniently skirted around issues they cannot handle and keep hammering on the goodness of Cao Cao. One who do not even know how a dynasty decides to locate their palaces that ensures the longevity of the reign, and how these decisions are still relevant today, is not fit to take a view, cause insofar whatever comes out of that person is just croaking from the well. And that in this case is ALamaking position. I would like to believe the former is someone of intelligence just as he/she had carried in other threads but sadly other than an overwhelming sympathizing overture, chest beating shouting for his perceived HERO. And he/she greatly personified this sentence - better to keep quiet than to have all doubts answered -and he/she answered.