Ms Lo Hwei Yen

[eatshitndie]

ms lo is nominated posthumously and posthumorishly for the second sinkie darwinian award, after darren ng.

wrong place, wrong time, right pm. (and wtf is so good about mumbai for a sinkie woman?)

 

[GoldenDragon]

Why? You looking for a textbook model answer for a situation that is not fixed? Too much Singapore kind of education for you maybe? Like I've said, every hostage situation is different and may need different type of response. Give me a clear example and I will give you my answer.

Ok, ok, I try for the last time. The late-Lo Hwei Yen's case. Was there a need for LHL to issue the statement? I am afraid I am not capable of making a clearer example for you. This is the best I can come up with.

 

[ChaoPappyPoodle]

i'm no fan of pinkie, but please provide proof of pinkie talking to hostage takers and their base of operations. if you cannot produce proof, you are simply a bunch of conspiracy theorists and armchair monday morning quarterbacks. worse, imh internees.

it's called common sense! by the same token, if you cannot provide proof that gay loong didn't help to expedite or help to close her case then shut up!

all you are doing is the same as anyone of us. using our knowledge to decipher what happened. The fact that she and other hsotages were not immediately and only she was killed and soon after gay loong opened his mouth.

it wasn't only his mouth but the things he said that were thoughtless given the situation. Given the situation and the things gay loong said, it couldn't have helped the hostage at all. Seeing the what he said would definitely be taken in a bad light by the terrorists it is surely logical to think that what he said irked them to the extend that she was chosen for execution.

Note that she was only a hostage like a few other hostages, a few who made it out alive.

It boils down to one question - do you think gay loongs words helped the situation? There are three probable answers -
1) it helped alleviate the situation for the hostage
2) it put the hostage in greater danger
3) it had no effect on the outcome

If you choose (3) then it is hard for you others to concur especially so when other hostages were not killed. If you choose (1) then you are a complete idiot and you should check yourself into IMH even though I know for a fact that there is no cure idiocy, at least we don't have to account for your idiocy here and your family may even thank us!

 

[eatshitndie]

Your dog may think you are suffering a heart attack. Better let your dog know all's well as long as your PM don't utter nonsense.

btw, i don't have pm. in the u.s., we have 3 branches: executive comprising president and cabinet, legislative comprising reps and senate, and judicial.

 

[GoldenDragon]

Ok, ok, I try for the last time. The late-Lo Hwei Yen's case. Was there a need for LHL to issue the statement? I am afraid I am not capable of making a clearer example for you. This is the best I can come up with.

I find it easier talking to kids. And asking them questions with just a 'yes' or 'no' answer.

Textbook answer? You should get LHL to read textbooks on what to say and what not to say when in a crisis situation. The bottomline is, when you can't help, do not worsen the situation. Coz no one will accuse you of being dumb when you remain silent.

 

[GoldenDragon]

btw, i don't have pm. in the u.s., we have 3 branches: executive comprising president and cabinet, legislative comprising reps and senate, and judicial.

Sorry, I was under the wrong impression people in the US were smarter. You proved me wrong.

 

[eatshitndie]

a lot of shit say here, but still no proof when challenged.

gladly rest my case.

still nominate ms. lo for second sinkie darwinian award. she never had more chances of passing down her unlucky genes.

 

[eatshitndie]

Sorry, I was under the wrong impression people in the US were smarter. You proved me wrong.

if we're that smart like sinkie imh internees, we wouldn't have voted barack into 18 acres.

 

[Frankiestine]

It is the passing of silly comments from its leaders that MAY cause one's death.

Silly comments, well that's a trait of this ruling gov isn't it?:p

 

[Frankiestine]

He was not telling the whole truth and tried to snake his way out

Now isn't that just keeping in line with his kind...

 

[Devil Within]

I am encouraged, your mental faculties seem to be showing some improvement. Now you've suddenly understood nuance. Give it some time and you may be able to add 1+1.

Don't flatter yourself. You can't understand simple logic least add 1+1.

 

[Devil Within]

Ok, ok, I try for the last time. The late-Lo Hwei Yen's case. Was there a need for LHL to issue the statement? I am afraid I am not capable of making a clearer example for you. This is the best I can come up with.

Aren't you reading? I've said before, LHL may be wrong in many things, but this is one case I do not find him wrong. There is nothing wrong issuing statement such as this. I do not conform with terrorist acts, be it against Singaporeans or not.

 

[Devil Within]

I find it easier talking to kids. And asking them questions with just a 'yes' or 'no' answer.

Textbook answer? You should get LHL to read textbooks on what to say and what not to say when in a crisis situation. The bottomline is, when you can't help, do not worsen the situation. Coz no one will accuse you of being dumb when you remain silent.

You find it easier talking to kids? Maybe your intellectual level is only up to that?

You people will find fault even if LHL kept quiet. You goons will come in and say why he didn't say this or why he didn't do anything blah blah blah.. Need examples? This forum is full of them. I won't be surprise if one day someone wrote that his dog can't shit because of LHL.

 

[rodent2005]

If asked why have quran and songkok but no potong, just tell them you are studiously studying the quran and appt already made for potong upon arrival to wherever you are headed for. That should satisfy them and allow you to live longer.

Aiyah, the terrorists will do you a favour and potong for you right there and then.

 

[GoldenDragon]

You find it easier talking to kids? Maybe your intellectual level is only up to that?

You people will find fault even if LHL kept quiet. You goons will come in and say why he didn't say this or why he didn't do anything blah blah blah.. Need examples? This forum is full of them. I won't be surprise if one day someone wrote that his dog can't shit because of LHL.

Thank you, bro.

 

[GoldenDragon]

Aiyah, the terrorists will do you a favour and potong for you right there and then.

Yes, I rather they potong me than let me eat bullets.

 

[rodent2005]

You find it easier talking to kids? Maybe your intellectual level is only up to that?

You people will find fault even if LHL kept quiet. You goons will come in and say why he didn't say this or why he didn't do anything blah blah blah.. Need examples? This forum is full of them. I won't be surprise if one day someone wrote that his dog can't shit because of LHL.

A wise man knows when to say something and when to keep quiet. It's the context. When LHL needs to say something, he should say it. When he needs to keep quiet, he should keep quiet.

Nobody will fault you if you know how to handle a situation.

 

[Devil Within]

A wise man knows when to say something and when to keep quiet. It's the context. When LHL needs to say something, he should say it. When he needs to keep quiet, he should keep quiet.

Nobody will fault you if you know how to handle a situation.

This, I will agree.

However, in the case of the Mumbai terrorist attack, there is nothing LHL can say will change anything. How many of those held hostage by the terrorist got free because their leaders kept quiet? I'm not talking about those who escaped being captured. Can you give me some examples where hostage got freed because their leaders kept quiet?

 

[TracyTan866]

are you suggesting the terrorists were listening to what the loonie pinkie had to say? are you saying they were in direct communication with him? oh fucking shit. did you just get released from woodbridge?

I dont know how professional are the terrorists. But for them to be able to carry out such an operation, they are not simpletons. To me, they seem better than the SPF who have deployed thousand of Policemen and army personnel but yet cant find a limp escapee.

Do you claim that you know the Mumbai terroristswell enough to know that they were incapable of knowing what transpired and they were not monitoring the news?

 

[TracyTan866]

Watch the documentary. There was a rescue attempt in one of the hostage situation, but failed as the killers killed all the hostages before they were killed, and before the rescue attempt.

All hostages were killed? did you check your sources?