• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Ms Lo Hwei Yen

i'm no fan of pinkie, but please provide proof of pinkie talking to hostage takers and their base of operations. if you cannot produce proof, you are simply a bunch of conspiracy theorists and armchair monday morning quarterbacks. worse, imh internees.

what lhl said was public and broadcasted.
 
Some captives were indeed released because they were from "friendly nations". Could Ms. Lo have said something like she was sympathetic to their cause to save her life? Or could the terrorists have thought that Singapore was a neutral nation and leave her alone? I mean, there were so many more US and UK nationals to kill right?

If you watched the documentary, some Muslims were killed as well. The killings were mostly indiscriminate, but their priority was foreigners especially US and UK citizens. One survivor said that he told the terrorist that they were Muslim just before they started firing. If he had not spoke out, he would has been killed as well. The terrorist were not interested to find out where you were from before they shoot. Unless you claim that you are a Muslim before they shoot.


So unless Hwei Yen claim she is a Muslim, maybe she got chance. Else, I think she is as good as dead when captured.
 
hahaha..and why are you debating with a brain dead or naive poster? arent you contradicting yourself?

are you frustrated that you have been exposed and are pinned to a corner that you have to resort to name calling?

I am not frustrated nor am I name calling. I am just stating the truth about you.
 
it's called common sense! by the same token, if you cannot provide proof that gay loong didn't help to expedite or help to close her case then shut up!

all you are doing is the same as anyone of us. using our knowledge to decipher what happened. The fact that she and other hsotages were not immediately and only she was killed and soon after gay loong opened his mouth.

it wasn't only his mouth but the things he said that were thoughtless given the situation. Given the situation and the things gay loong said, it couldn't have helped the hostage at all. Seeing the what he said would definitely be taken in a bad light by the terrorists it is surely logical to think that what he said irked them to the extend that she was chosen for execution.

Note that she was only a hostage like a few other hostages, a few who made it out alive.

It boils down to one question - do you think gay loongs words helped the situation? There are three probable answers -
1) it helped alleviate the situation for the hostage
2) it put the hostage in greater danger
3) it had no effect on the outcome

If you choose (3) then it is hard for you others to concur especially so when other hostages were not killed. If you choose (1) then you are a complete idiot and you should check yourself into IMH even though I know for a fact that there is no cure idiocy, at least we don't have to account for your idiocy here and your family may even thank us!

Well done. You are indeed a patient and rational man. Let's see his response.
 
Your gay loong leader went against every script ever written when dealing with hostage takers.

LHL boasts a double first from Cambridge. I suspect he was going for a triple first by writing a new handbook on hostage negotiation. Only one sentence exists in his book - condemn the terrorists at your first opportunity to wake them up and they will free your citizens.

A M'sian leader once described MM as 'too clever by half' some 45 years ago. 45 years later, I say the same for the son.

There are many books and articles written on hostage negotiation and none teaches you to be hostile towards the terrorists while they have the upper hand. Sadly, LHL was either ignorant or wrongly advised. Silence is not golden all the time but in this case, silent means enhancing the chances of survival for your national.
 
hahaha..it may be a joke to you as you dont know the discussion subject

for those who know the discussion, we are taking lhl to task for his silliness and stupidity which caused an innocent life...that's not a joke to him

Why don't you take India gov to task for not stopping the terrorist when the terrorist started killing hours before they entered the hotel?

Why don't you take India gov to task for being so useless and incompetent in handling the terrorist situation?

Why don't you take the Muslim to task for not speaking out about carrying terrorist act in the name of Islam?

Why don't you take Muslim terrorist organisation to task for carrying out such horrific act of indiscriminate killing?

And of all people you take a small fly LHL for not saying the smartest thing?

LOL!....
 
btw, i don't have pm. in the u.s., we have 3 branches: executive comprising president and cabinet, legislative comprising reps and senate, and judicial.

what has that got to do with what we are discussing... a country's leader make uncalled for and stupid statements that endangered his country's citizen's life?

dont try to snake your way ard
 
a lot of shit say here, but still no proof when challenged.

gladly rest my case.

still nominate ms. lo for second sinkie darwinian award. she never had more chances of passing down her unlucky genes.

I am also glad that you finally conceded that your points were untenable
 
A wise man knows when to say something and when to keep quiet. It's the context. When LHL needs to say something, he should say it. When he needs to keep quiet, he should keep quiet.

Nobody will fault you if you know how to handle a situation.

Well said. If lhl had kept his mouth shut, no one would know his calibre. Now the whole world knows that lhl is stupid
 
hahaha..it may be a joke to you as you dont know the discussion subject

for those who know the discussion, we are taking lhl to task for his silliness and stupidity which caused an innocent life...that's not a joke to him

Ever wondered why nobody in Parliament brought this up for discussion? I honestly opine LHL screwed up big time here.

If another chap of lesser influence, had uttered those words and the casualty was a MIW or his/her family members, that chap who spoke out would have been shot rightaway.

Who says what and not what was said, that is the key. If I ever land up as a hostage in future, I would pray that LHL shut his mouth up. I am even prepared to allow Dr Chee SJ, though crazy, to decide my fate. That is how much faith I have on LHL.
 
It is much easier to point to countless examples all over the world where idiots mouth off the wrong things and hostages are killed either immediately or shortly thereafter.

The game plan has always been to buy time so that counter-terrorist teams or SWAT teams are in place to storm the scene and to rescue as many hostages as possible.

Your gay loong leader went against every script ever written when dealing with hostage takers.


Exactly. It clearly showed lhl's lack of qualities and poor leadership
 
You are right. lhl is such a disaster. Singapore cant afford lhl another term. Either the pap changes lhl, or Singaporeans have to change the pap

Based on this episode and he has a double 1st, at leat 3 million S'poreans would have more than double 1st from Cambridge. He makes me malu only. Surely you only need to be an average Joe to know better.
 
Some captives were indeed released because they were from "friendly nations". Could Ms. Lo have said something like she was sympathetic to their cause to save her life? Or could the terrorists have thought that Singapore was a neutral nation and leave her alone? I mean, there were so many more US and UK nationals to kill right?

Exactly.

so why wld the terrorist single out Hwei Yen, an innocent hostage from insignificant Singapore, to be killed almost immediately after lhl's condemnation? any logical minded person would link the two events to be related.

If the terrorist wantwed to heighten the tension, they wld have chosen an American or a Bristish hostage.

It is clear to me that they wanted to show their anger against Singapore by choosing Hwei yen to be shot.
 
Exactly.

so why wld the terrorist single out Hwei Yen, an innocent hostage from insignificant Singapore, to be killed almost immediately after lhl's condemnation? any logical minded person would link the two events to be related.

If the terrorist wantwed to heighten the tension, they wld have chosen an American or a Bristish hostage.

It is clear to me that they wanted to show their anger against Singapore by choosing Hwei yen to be shot.

She was not single out. She was killed indiscriminately in a group together with others. Watch the documentary at 41mins.
 
How did you come out with this.

1) The terrorists were not tuned in to the media
2) They were on a mission to do as much mayhem, killing and destruction.
3) Singapore does not register in the maps and minds of most people around the world.
4) The World media would not have carried it his message because there were more interesting things to report.
5) When the world sees his name being mentioned, they might have associated him with some nutcase from Taiwanese parliament.
6) There was no negotiation, hostage taking etc

The PAP is an oppressive regime and LHL has never been an impressive person. You are giving credit to an idiot who can't even convince his father not to intervene.

If you want to screw the PAP, at least pick something credible and logical. Secondly learn to read the newspaper properly and if you find it difficult, take it slowly. Thirdly, try and connect the dots. If you can't just keep quiet and let us think you got have a half a brain.

Only a clown will believe that something that was reported in the local papers and attributed to an idiot can actually influence an event half way around the world.




Most people blamed terror when the gunmen shot Hwei Yen. But not many people know that someone's stupidity agitated the gunmen and caused them to shoot at Singaporean. The PM wanted to sound "heroic" and denounced the gunmen when Hwei Yen, a Singaporean, was in their hands and was very vulnerable.

I blame his stupidity and unnecessary comment for causing Hwei Yen's death. A stupid PM has blood on his hands.

Hwei Yen, RIP
 
Back
Top