-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Serious WHY NO BAN ON FLIGHTS FROM INDIA????
- Thread starter Pinkieslut
- Start date
Just get yr arse fuck by Hakkien, yr LKY gang.
U are not spared their as long as u are one of the Chikien.
u motherfucker Burmhist bad mouthing Chinese is yr favourite passtime all these years.
I shall take u on this time, motherfucker Chikien u....
U are not spared their as long as u are one of the Chikien.
u motherfucker Burmhist bad mouthing Chinese is yr favourite passtime all these years.
I shall take u on this time, motherfucker Chikien u....
More the fuckeins offerings up their asses to the Hakkas...n ChiCons n now shitcas like Rat face Ong
Go fuck yrslf broken record... dumbfuck chinkmarician u. Go get bash by niggers..
Ong Ye Kung: Travellers from India stay in third country before flying to SG assume lower risk profile - The Online Citizen Asia
by Correspondent
27/04/2021
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Ong Ye Kung: Travellers from India stay in third country before flying to SG assume lower risk profile
At a press briefing announcing the Singapore-Hong Kong air travel bubble yesterday (26 Apr), Transport Minister Ong Ye Kung was asked about Indian nationals flying in from other countries to bypass the current travel ban flying directly from India.
Ong replied that a traveller who has left India but stayed in another country before flying to Singapore would not have the same level of risk as someone who came directly from India.
The soon-to-be Health Minister said that anyone staying in one place long enough would assume the risk profile of that place. “I think, as a matter of general infection control knowledge, regardless of your nationality, if you stay in a place long enough, you assume the risk profile of that place,” he said.
“You may be from another country, but once you stay in a new country for a while, you assume a new risk profile.”
“But if your policy is to target risk, then for someone from a high-risk country to move to a lower risk country, stay there for some time, and after that remain non COVID-positive, remain negative, and then come to Singapore … they have lowered the risk in that process,” added Mr Ong.
In recent days, many Indian nationals on long-term and short-term passes have tried to use a third country to stay for 14 days before flying off to enter Singapore.
For example, Nepali media reported last Wed (21 Apr) that Indian nationals have been flying into Nepal, packing the hotels in Kathmandu before flying off to their destination countries including Singapore (‘Indian nationals use Nepal to circumvent travel bans resulting in crowding in hotels at Kathmandu‘).
Singapore starting banning travellers except Singapore citizens and PRs to enter here if they have been in India in the past 14 days. The ban started at 11.59pm last Friday (23 Apr). This includes visitors who transit in India and those who had earlier obtained approval for entry into Singapore.
The border measure was implemented amid a spike in COVID-19 infections in India. On Monday, India’s daily coronavirus cases set a new global record for the fifth straight day. With 352,991 new cases, India’s total caseload has crossed 17 million. Deaths rose by a new daily record of 2,812 to reach a total of 195,123.
Yesterday, the Ministry of Health confirmed that there were 23 imported cases who had travelled directly from India. They included Indian nationals and PRs. They also included 7 Singapore citizens. Another 6 Indian nationals who were tested positive came from third countries Nepal and Sri Lanka.
Share this:
by Correspondent
27/04/2021
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Ong Ye Kung: Travellers from India stay in third country before flying to SG assume lower risk profile
At a press briefing announcing the Singapore-Hong Kong air travel bubble yesterday (26 Apr), Transport Minister Ong Ye Kung was asked about Indian nationals flying in from other countries to bypass the current travel ban flying directly from India.
Ong replied that a traveller who has left India but stayed in another country before flying to Singapore would not have the same level of risk as someone who came directly from India.
The soon-to-be Health Minister said that anyone staying in one place long enough would assume the risk profile of that place. “I think, as a matter of general infection control knowledge, regardless of your nationality, if you stay in a place long enough, you assume the risk profile of that place,” he said.
“You may be from another country, but once you stay in a new country for a while, you assume a new risk profile.”
“But if your policy is to target risk, then for someone from a high-risk country to move to a lower risk country, stay there for some time, and after that remain non COVID-positive, remain negative, and then come to Singapore … they have lowered the risk in that process,” added Mr Ong.
In recent days, many Indian nationals on long-term and short-term passes have tried to use a third country to stay for 14 days before flying off to enter Singapore.
For example, Nepali media reported last Wed (21 Apr) that Indian nationals have been flying into Nepal, packing the hotels in Kathmandu before flying off to their destination countries including Singapore (‘Indian nationals use Nepal to circumvent travel bans resulting in crowding in hotels at Kathmandu‘).
Singapore starting banning travellers except Singapore citizens and PRs to enter here if they have been in India in the past 14 days. The ban started at 11.59pm last Friday (23 Apr). This includes visitors who transit in India and those who had earlier obtained approval for entry into Singapore.
The border measure was implemented amid a spike in COVID-19 infections in India. On Monday, India’s daily coronavirus cases set a new global record for the fifth straight day. With 352,991 new cases, India’s total caseload has crossed 17 million. Deaths rose by a new daily record of 2,812 to reach a total of 195,123.
Yesterday, the Ministry of Health confirmed that there were 23 imported cases who had travelled directly from India. They included Indian nationals and PRs. They also included 7 Singapore citizens. Another 6 Indian nationals who were tested positive came from third countries Nepal and Sri Lanka.
Share this:
KNN does ong know that pay some money can get this bypass done without leelee staying in the 3rd cuntry KNN
This fuckein plp the ah nehs really well. Even other countries just ban ah neh flights n say its for public safety....Rat Face goes a step even further..
Theindependent
Travellers from India coming through another country pose a different risk level
Author
- Advertisement -
Singapore—Transport Minister Ong Ye Kung clarified on Monday (Apr 26) that the ban on travellers from India is not meant to target any nationality, but to counter a risk to public health because of India’s recent surge in infections.
He was speaking at a media briefing for the announcement of the Singapore-Hong Kong air travel bubble.
Mr Ong further explained that if someone from India travelled to another country before coming to Singapore, this would pose a different risk level from someone who came directly from India.
The Straits Times reports that a question had arisen as to whether Indian nationals who arrive from other countries would be exempted from a travel ban on long-term pass holders and short-term visitors who travelled to India within the last two weeks.
- Advertisement -
Mr Ong explained that people who stay in an area long enough are assumed to have that area’s risk profile, no matter what nationality they have.
“If your policy is to target risk, then for someone from a high-risk country to move to a lower-risk country, stay there for some time, and after that remain non-Covid positive… and then come to Singapore, actually, you have lowered the risk tremendously in that process,” he added.
Answering another question, Mr Ong stated that Singapore mandates that anyone flying into the country must stay for 14 days outside of India.
Last week, on Apr 22 (Thursday), Minister Lawrence Wong, who co-chairs the multi-ministry task force on Covid-19, announced new measures to bar all long-term pass holders and visitors traveling from India for the sake of public health.
“The situation is very fluid, and even one case may potentially lead to a cluster of infections,” he wrote in a Facebook post.
The MOH said on Apr 20 that all travellers from India would be required to serve an additional seven-day stay-home notice (SHN) at their place of residence in addition to the 14-day SHN at dedicated SHN facilities imposed immediately upon arrival. Entry approvals for non-Singapore citizens or permanent residents arriving from India would also be reduced.
Mr Wong added that the SHN was not “100 per cent foolproof” and that workers who had just arrived from India could possibly infect migrant workers living in dorms and cause new clusters even as he acknowledged that the ban would have a major impact on our construction, marine and process sectors.
But the ban would also give the country the leeway to further look into the situation, he added.
/TISG
Follow us on Social Media
Theindependent
Travellers from India coming through another country pose a different risk level
Author
- Advertisement -
Singapore—Transport Minister Ong Ye Kung clarified on Monday (Apr 26) that the ban on travellers from India is not meant to target any nationality, but to counter a risk to public health because of India’s recent surge in infections.
He was speaking at a media briefing for the announcement of the Singapore-Hong Kong air travel bubble.
Mr Ong further explained that if someone from India travelled to another country before coming to Singapore, this would pose a different risk level from someone who came directly from India.
The Straits Times reports that a question had arisen as to whether Indian nationals who arrive from other countries would be exempted from a travel ban on long-term pass holders and short-term visitors who travelled to India within the last two weeks.
- Advertisement -
Mr Ong explained that people who stay in an area long enough are assumed to have that area’s risk profile, no matter what nationality they have.
“If your policy is to target risk, then for someone from a high-risk country to move to a lower-risk country, stay there for some time, and after that remain non-Covid positive… and then come to Singapore, actually, you have lowered the risk tremendously in that process,” he added.
Answering another question, Mr Ong stated that Singapore mandates that anyone flying into the country must stay for 14 days outside of India.
Last week, on Apr 22 (Thursday), Minister Lawrence Wong, who co-chairs the multi-ministry task force on Covid-19, announced new measures to bar all long-term pass holders and visitors traveling from India for the sake of public health.
“The situation is very fluid, and even one case may potentially lead to a cluster of infections,” he wrote in a Facebook post.
The MOH said on Apr 20 that all travellers from India would be required to serve an additional seven-day stay-home notice (SHN) at their place of residence in addition to the 14-day SHN at dedicated SHN facilities imposed immediately upon arrival. Entry approvals for non-Singapore citizens or permanent residents arriving from India would also be reduced.
Mr Wong added that the SHN was not “100 per cent foolproof” and that workers who had just arrived from India could possibly infect migrant workers living in dorms and cause new clusters even as he acknowledged that the ban would have a major impact on our construction, marine and process sectors.
But the ban would also give the country the leeway to further look into the situation, he added.
/TISG
Follow us on Social Media
Well ...look at it from a bright side....
The ah neh ceca body odour still the same you tell me he stay Nepal kathmandu a few days the "smell" profile will be difference?Yes, I'm sure the virus in the infected ones 'assumed a lower risk profile' once they entered a third country. The virus might even stay in that country for a holiday, and not follow the host back to Sinkieland.
If you killpapdogs for ceca. Thats not too bad
Shh now the liars sayits gasleak deathsFuck India, this is my wallpaper in celebration of shitskin deaths.
They should make a bigger one, more dead filthy shitskins coming.
Shh dont tell sinkies jiuhu kia at least medicine is local. Sinkies need to believe they are the bestestWe need India for its drugs. Many of the prescribed drugs are made in India: cough syrup, flu medicine, paracetamol, sore throat lozenges, antibiotics, medical skin creams etc. Made by companies such Ranbaxy. Read the fine print on your medicine the next time you report sick and take MC.
if the pap has any decency, they would halt all flights now. For the life of me, I can't figure why they haven't done so. Are they overly confident cases wouldn't overwhelm ICUs? Do they want the population to get infected and develop immunity? Are they so scared of India? Do they value the economy more than citizens?
The risk is actually quite low so the PAP is taking the pragmatic approach.
Other countries have adopted a response to appease their citizens which the PAP government does not have to do as they have 61% support.
I understand what you're saying. It's just that we are such a small space with too many people. Not ideal during a pandemic. And yeah, the blank cheque too.
so diseased indians can still enter despite them publicly saying no entry???
Similar threads
