HUH what do u mean?
Who wants to be aryan???
Keling, now projecting ur own fantasies unto others?
So chinese hindus are now keling? Twisted out of the topic?
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
What ang mohs say about kelings
- Thread starter Jah_rastafar_I
- Start date
HUH what do u mean?
Who wants to be aryan???
Keling, now projecting ur own fantasies unto others?
So chinese hindus are now keling? Twisted out of the topic?
Nepal enjoys the glory of always being a sovereign and independent country. It has never been under foreign domination.
Lumbini Garden, The Birthplace Of Sakyamuni.
Lumbini Garden, The Birthplace Of Sakyamuni.
HUH what do u mean?
Who wants to be aryan???
Keling, now projecting ur own fantasies unto others?
So chinese hindus are now keling? Twisted out of the topic?
Please exprain ( your English) the high rates of cosmetic surgery for double eyelids, raised nose, 'goose egg' faces in East Asia?
No there was no Nepal in Buddha's time. Only small independent kingdoms, much like in every part of the world.
Prince Siddharth was a Hindu Aryan of royal blood. The word India comes from the word Hindu. Therefore if one was Hindu, one was Indian.
Simple. Cant handle the truth? See a shrink.
The whole world knows that Buddha was an Indian. And he achieved enlightment in Bihar, India not Nepal.
So tell me tell me why did Miley Cyrus, the Argentinians and the Spanish teams in the Olympics make 'gooky face' pics? All white people
Nepal has always been a small independent kingdom. Thanks for the confirmation.
The name India is derived from Greek Hindía (Ἰνδία), via Latin India.
The first Olympic gold medalist from India should be Chinese instead according to your geographical logic.
PS. Arriving from the east around the 7th or 8th century BC, these Mongoloid people are the first known rulers of the Kathmandu Valley. In the 6th century BC, Prince Siddhartha Gautama was born into the Sakya royal family of Kapilavastu, near Lumbini, later embarking on a path of meditation and thought that led him to enlightenment as the Buddha.
The name India is derived from Greek Hindía (Ἰνδία), via Latin India.
The first Olympic gold medalist from India should be Chinese instead according to your geographical logic.
PS. Arriving from the east around the 7th or 8th century BC, these Mongoloid people are the first known rulers of the Kathmandu Valley. In the 6th century BC, Prince Siddhartha Gautama was born into the Sakya royal family of Kapilavastu, near Lumbini, later embarking on a path of meditation and thought that led him to enlightenment as the Buddha.
Attachments
Keling those types of surgeries are dependant on an individual's preference. These ppl are definitely not changing their race. I have never heard of a chinese changing his surname to an ang moh one unlike you kelings.
Goose egg faces? what's that??? Pinchio noses, long horse faces, snake eyes.
all i know is even PRCs chicks reject ah neh customer...
the stench really so bad hor?
What????? What's your point? Now u simply type rubbish with no meaning whatsoever. Retarded moron.
Good job in high lighting the word mongoloid. This keling scum is soooo caught up on unimportant stuff.
Do u know that there are east asian, malay looking types of ppl living in shit land as keling nationals and yet according to this keling, since they are not "aryan" they are not indian
Don't take about this god and that god. The real god to those dumb Indians is this moron. :p
No, Nepal was never a small independent kingdom. It was many kingdoms, some of which stretched right into present day India.
And the mongoloids came in the 7th or 8th century. Buddhas family arose in the 6th. Thats about 200 years. It doesnt mean that Buddhas family was Mongoloid. Even now, the upper strata of Nepalis ( the royal family, the poiliticians etc) are Aryan. Does Gayanendra look Mongoloid?
Does Koirala look Mongoloid?
I think you know the score. Wasting my time writing to you. Buddha was Aryan and Hindu- not Mongoloid. (This is like saying all Malaysians are Malays because they were there first). Like I said the whole world knows Buddha was an Aryan Hindu. That makes him Indian.
an excerpt: Conception and birth
Siddhartha was born in Lumbini[7] and raised in the small kingdom or principality of Kapilvastu, both of which are in modern day Nepal. Culturally, these can be considered part of the broader region of Ancient India.[
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gautama_Buddha
Last edited:
<object width="352" height="288"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/selfqEH-JnY&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/selfqEH-JnY&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="352" height="288"></embed></object>
Don't take about this god and that god. The real god to those dumb Indians is this moron. :p
I heard that the CEO's position over at Satyam (Truth in Sanskrit) is still available.
Arriving from the east around the 7th or 8th century BC, these Mongoloid people are the first known rulers of the Kathmandu Valley. King Yalambar (the first of their 29 kings) is mentioned in the Mahabharata, the Hindu epic, but little more is known about them.
Arriving from the east around the 7th or 8th century BC, these Mongoloid people are the first known rulers of the Kathmandu Valley. King Yalambar (the first of their 29 kings) is mentioned in the Mahabharata, the Hindu epic, but little more is known about them.
No, Nepal was never a small independent kingdom. It was many kingdoms, some of which stretched right into present day India.
And the mongoloids came in the 7th or 8th century. Buddhas family arose in the 6th. Thats about 200 years. It doesnt mean that Buddhas family was Mongoloid. Even now, the upper strata of Nepalis ( the royal family, the poiliticians etc) are Aryan. Does Gayanendra look Mongoloid?
Does Koirala look Mongoloid?
I think you know the score. Wasting my time writing to you. Buddha was Aryan and Hindu- not Mongoloid. (This is like saying all Malayasians are Malays because they were there first). Like I said the whole world knows Buddha was an Aryan Hindu. That makes him Indian
Good job in high lighting the word mongoloid. This keling scum is soooo caught up on unimportant stuff.
Do u know that there are east asian, malay looking types of ppl living in shit land as keling nationals and yet according to this keling, since they are not "aryan" they are not indian
Mongoloid -Down's Syndrome. One Caucasian researcher actually theorized that Mongoloids were a degenerate form of the white race.
And in any case highlighting a word dont mean you can change facts. Facts are that Aryans ruled over the Mongoloids in the kathmandu valley. As they still do today in Modern Singapore- its known as the Ang Mo Tua Kee syndrome.
First exposed by Jah Rastafar in his excerpt from Stormfront,(where he goes in hope of becoming white)- JR is very sold on the idea of white validation
what do you mean "little more is known about them". What kind of English is that? Was what was intended "not much more was known about them" - or "little was known about them". did you doctor the piece until you screwed
yourself?
Why not post the URL. I notice you highlight but no URL.
If you are not happy with the information or standard of English, you can jolly well do your homework and sue the publishers of the article if you want to.
PS Mongoloid - The classification is primarily useful when studying human prehistory, and in forensic analysis of human remains, in which "Mongoloid" denotes a particular racial skull type.
PS Mongoloid - The classification is primarily useful when studying human prehistory, and in forensic analysis of human remains, in which "Mongoloid" denotes a particular racial skull type.
Yes the East Asian skull type or Blumencach's Mongoliod. And whihc article where? Please show me the way. The URL please
Good job in high lighting the word mongoloid. This keling scum is soooo caught up on unimportant stuff.
Do u know that there are east asian, malay looking types of ppl living in shit land as keling nationals and yet according to this keling, since they are not "aryan" they are not indian
No I did not say not Aryan is not Indian. All I said was Aryan was Indian.
Not capable of such logic? nevermind, take care.
And why rolleyes all the time. Something in your arse?
COming from a twisting turning keling like you we dun know if u made shit up. In any case nepal had mongoloids and not aryans or what crap u wrote.
Btw Mongoloid is no more used to describe ppl with down's syndrome, and is used to describe ppl from a broad racial perspective in archeology.
As for white validation, what did u write?u mentioned some ang moh said mongoloids were degenerate form of caucasian? Keling so ur so happy to quote from ang moh? Too bad ur not ang moh.
Similar threads
