• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

To a better Singapore

He can start off by telling us what he intends to do with the 99 year lease terms should the oppo win the next election. Automatic extension for another 99 years for everyone who owns an HDB flat? 50 year extension? That would make a mockery of the laws of the land and severely penalise those who paid a premium for freehold properties.

And what about those private condos with a 99 year lease? Would he extend the lease for them too?

Listen to the video. He does nothing but criticise and berate the government. Any fool can do that.

If there's an extension it would probably be at the market rate of the land cost...as for private condos we have to look at case studies of old condos that have chosen to demolish and sell off their land to a redeveloper.....freehold is probably more likely to do it....although leasehold might too if there's been massive appreciation of land value over time.

The economist in me says to leave the 99 year lease as it is....let nature and market forces deal with it it's own way,things tend to get worse when u tamper with the forces of economic nature.
 
The government is doing the right thing in taxing cars heavily because vehicles are the bane of all societies. They take up far too much space and the infrastructure that caters to cars are a big blot on any cityscape.

Nobody is faulting the policy of controlling the cr population. It's the implementation that's questionable and telling.
Having the existing fixed quota but with a fixed amount per vehicle and based on drawing lots could be another method to control car population.
However, the primary objective of the PAP's solution is 'Making Money'. It's making the people to Pay and Pay for a 10-year rental vehicle. Furthermore, such a system can be easily manipulated. It 's also a system that benefits and pleases the rich. The ruLEEng PAP LEEders has never been fair to the people of Singapore.
 
Name me one body that is independent.

Thank you, for therein lies the true nature of the ruling PAP and its arrogant and self-serving LEEders. What is presented and told to the people is seldom reality or the truth. It's STAGED TO FIT AND FIX.
 
Quote:
He can start off by telling us what he intends to do with the 99 year lease terms should the oppo win the next election. Automatic extension for another 99 years for everyone who owns an HDB flat? 50 year extension? That would make a mockery of the laws of the land and severely penalise those who paid a premium for freehold properties.

And what about those private condos with a 99 year lease? Would he extend the lease for them too?

Listen to the video. He does nothing but criticise and berate the government. Any fool can do that.


If Lim Tean ever quote and give solution to the problem Papaya would steal the idea and claim its their idea!!

Unless he's elected into ParLeeMent on the next Erection!! I am sure will be the next MP for a start!
 
Quote:
He can start off by telling us what he intends to do with the 99 year lease terms should the oppo win the next election. Automatic extension for another 99 years for everyone who owns an HDB flat? 50 year extension? That would make a mockery of the laws of the land and severely penalise those who paid a premium for freehold properties.

And what about those private condos with a 99 year lease? Would he extend the lease for them too?

Listen to the video. He does nothing but criticise and berate the government. Any fool can do that.


If Lim Tean ever quote and give solution to the problem Papaya would steal the idea and claim its their idea!!

Unless he's elected into ParLeeMent on the next Erection!! I am sure will be the next MP for a start!

Can you please learn to quote properly.
 
The problem with the oppos is that they are always full on when it comes to criticism but fall way short on policy and when they do suggest policy it is invariably pie-in-the-sky stuff that ignores reality or evokes resentment by playing the politics of envy.

Fall way short on policies?

... and when they do suggest policy it is invariably pie-in-the-sky stuff?

Suggest you check this out http://yoursdp.org/publ/sdp_39_s_alternatives/23
 
Fall way short on policies?

... and when they do suggest policy it is invariably pie-in-the-sky stuff?

Suggest you check this out http://yoursdp.org/publ/sdp_39_s_alternatives/23

This is exactly what I mean by "pie in the sky" stuff.

Example:

  1. Peg ministerial pay to the bottom 20 percent of Singaporean wage earners.
  2. MPs’ allowance should be 10 times the mean wage of the bottom 20th percentile (based on the assumption that there is a minimum wage in place).
  3. Ministers should be paid three times the MP allowance; the prime minister should be paid four times that amount. Based on our recommendations the prime minister would likely paid $56,000 a month and a minister $42,000. These wages are more than fair.

Even a half fucked OKT can earn more than $56,000 per month you expect the PM to work for less than a pimp??? :rolleyes:
 
I tried to insert quote but ur system can't, I can only see previous quote?? U show me how??
 
This is exactly what I mean by "pie in the sky" stuff.

Example:

  1. Peg ministerial pay to the bottom 20 percent of Singaporean wage earners.
  2. MPs’ allowance should be 10 times the mean wage of the bottom 20th percentile (based on the assumption that there is a minimum wage in place).
  3. Ministers should be paid three times the MP allowance; the prime minister should be paid four times that amount. Based on our recommendations the prime minister would likely paid $56,000 a month and a minister $42,000. These wages are more than fair.

Even a half fucked OKT can earn more than $56,000 per month you expect the PM to work for less than a pimp??? :rolleyes:

but hes a prime minister and not a pimp,between what kind of pimp earns $56,000 a month?pimp of kabukicho?

however ill agree LHL is the number one pimp daddy of Singapore pimping millions of sinkies asses everyday and pimping aint easy.if he wears a gold chain and carries a pimp cane and make sinkies kiss his pimp ring,ill agree to give him a raise.

 
I tried to insert quote but ur system can't, I can only see previous quote?? U show me how??

Typical sinkie blaming my system for your ignorance. My system can do anything you want. If you want to quote the whole post just hit "reply".

If you want quote a line just highlight the line and select "reply".
 
Back
Top