Daniel PS Goh
Election Fever III: Celebrating Contribution vs. Claiming CreditI wrote this in a post in August 2013:
Some stuff has been going around the Net since NDR about how WP came up with some of the proposed changes announced by the PM, and a friend asked me this morning how come WP not given credit. Friend also asked me what I think of the PM adopting "your" idea of doing away with PSLE T-scores and using a wide band with more DSAs that JJ and I wrote about. Following was my answer, transcribed from a conversation that was more colourful.
No lah, first of all, it would be presumptuous and plain silly for me to claim credit for anything. I have been reading widely (MSM articles, blogs, scholarly work, etc) and thinking about the issue, so have JJ. And we both discussed and came up with an argument for it. The intellectual commons gave rise to the idea. We are merely co-creators, part of the crowd-sourcing process. Ideas don't belong to individuals; they circulate and get worked by different people. We should move away from this whole super-talent, brilliant idea rubbish. Anyone who suggest he/she is a talent, don't trust him/her.
The real talent is someone who knows how to listen and then put things together for the benefit of everyone. PM is our PM, so it is his responsibility to be a super-talent in this respect, to pick up from the intellectual commons to make the necessary policy changes. As initially disappointed as I was with the NDR, and still am, I think he is doing a pretty decent job. The OSC could be seen as a big "listen-in", but the OSC is an occasional "listen-in" and I don't think political parties should be involved. WP is part of the parliamentary process that is the regular "listen-in" for the government. The point is not that WP, PAP, SDP, AOs or NGOs came up with the ideas; the point should be how well the government is crowd-sourcing to do the best to benefit all Singaporeans; the point is that the rest of us would do our part by joining in the debate.
I don't know whether someone in the Civil Service picked up the idea from us and then it worked its way up to the PM. I don't care to know. If so, I am happy to have contributed to nation-building. If not, I am still in happy agreement with the tweaks. I suspect it was a good coincidence, perhaps a logical convergence. Regardless, I will still continue to make new arguments and reevaluate old ones. Ignore anyone trying to play the credit game (or the blame game of saying WP didn't do squat, which is the other side of the coin) and don't try to get me involved!
I am reminded of it because some of the usual suspects jumped on my post celebrating Li Lian’s contribution to the debate on equalising help and support for single parents and accuse it with the tired refrain of "claiming credit". This is not even a nuance; there is a big difference between celebrating contribution and claiming credit.
The problem with overly-partisan supporters on both sides is that they see everything in terms of “claiming credit”. So the overly-partisan PAP supporter would shove Grace Fu and Irene Ng to your face when WP supporters celebrate Li Lian’s contribution and chide you for claiming credit, or the overly-partisan opposition support would poo-poo Grace and Irene and claim with arrogant certainty that the government won’t have changed its policy if not for WP’s Li Lian.
Who are we, who am I to give credit? We should stop thinking like we are high-almighty judges or examiners who could discern cosmic cause-and-effect. Come down from pedestals and soapboxes. In the end, the only one that gets the credit for doing good policy is the government, and the one that gets the credit for listening and considering feedback is the government. That is because it is their role to do so. The rest of us, the public, the MPs, are just doing our part. Let people be happy and proud of our work, be it you are with Grace, Irene or Li Lian. Celebrate the fact that at last the single parents might get equal benefits, celebrate our contribution to the process.
Why is this important for GE? It is important because WP's contribution to policy changes and reversals will be discussed during the GE, so will the PAP's role in getting these policy changes comprehensively discussed, effectively implemented and properly explained with all the complexities involved, so will SPP's and SDP's contribution to parliamentary and public discourse. Each party will celebrate their contribution and express how they will seek to continue to do so.
The public will evaluate each party's and the candidates' past and potential contribution in the true sense of the word e-value-ate. Relative value will determine the vote, or so I hope in my wish for the rational electorate to remain so. Rubbishing anyone's celebration of contribution as claiming credit will only cloud the discussion and subvert the rational electorate.
[h=5]
Daniel PS Goh
[/h]July 29 at 5:22pm ·
Li Lian has relentlessly pursued this issue since her by-election campaign in Punggol East in 2013. Each year in COS during Budget debate, she would raise this issue, each time more heart-wrenching than the last. I remember speaking to her about this, earlier this year, and she asked, "Is there any point raising this issue again in Parliament? The government is not listening." In her typical quick-firing manner, before I could answer, she said, "Yes, must raise." And then she went to talk to a resident. It must be very gratifying for her now, and we are so proud of her.
WP has ‘done a good job’ in Parliament: Lee Li Lian (WITH VIDEO)
Workers’ Party (WP) candidate for Punggol East Lee Li Lian on Tuesday defended the performance of her party mates in Parliament over the past year and a half...
sg.news.yahoo.com