The Insanity Conundrum

[jw5]

If you harm someone physically or even kill someone, they will conclude that it's due to one of the following reasons:

1. You had a reason, that person said or did something bad to you.

2. You are evil, devoid of morals, ethics and inhibitions.

3. You are insane.

If they didn't want the reason in item 1 to be disclosed and discussed, they would have to conclude that item 2 or 3 was the reason.
If they concluded that the reason was item 2, they would have to include item 1 or 3 as well, because item 2 as a reason cannot stand on its own. You either had to have a reason or you had to be insane, in addition to simply being evil.
But if they didn't want the reason in item 1 to be disclosed and discussed, then they would have to conclude that you were insane. Right?

 

[TeeKee]

i have only one explanation for all these actions.

SIN

 

[jimmyfallon]

Just dont get caught

 

[Hakka Tiow]

If you harm someone physically or even kill someone, they will conclude that

it's due to one of the following reasons:

1. You had a reason, that person said or did something bad to you.

2. You are evil, devoid of morals, ethics and inhibitions.

3. You are insane.

If they didn't want the reason in item 1 to be disclosed and discussed, they would have to conclude that item 2 or 3 was the reason.
If they concluded that the reason was item 2, they would have to include item 1 or 3 as well, because item 2 as a reason cannot stand on its own. You either had to have a reason or you had to be insane, in addition to simply being evil.
But if they didn't want the reason in item 1 to be disclosed and discussed, then they would have to conclude that you were insane. Right?

Well that depends very much whether "They" are the "judicial system and their masters" or the general bitching of the "public at large."