• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Singapore DISCRIMINATES against its own citizens by not returning their CPF savings.

CPFscam said:
This is K A R M A in action - Breaking news - Winston Peters is now Deputy Prime Minister.

Under the National government, cover-ups, subterfuge, dishonesty, lies and the blatant DISCRIMINATION AGAINST SINGAPOREANS began under this Chief Executive, Brendan Boyle, who ruled CPF savings of Singaporeans belong to the NZ government but not John Key's CPF savings and the thousands of Kiwis who worked in Singapore and collected their tax-free CPF savings from the Singapore CPF Board.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11914930
Click to expand...
CPFscam said:
This is K A R M A in action - Breaking news - Winston Peters is now Deputy Prime Minister.

Under the National government, cover-ups, subterfuge, dishonesty, lies and the blatant DISCRIMINATION AGAINST SINGAPOREANS began under this Chief Executive, Brendan Boyle, who ruled CPF savings of Singaporeans belong to the NZ government but not John Key's CPF savings and the thousands of Kiwis who worked in Singapore and collected their tax-free CPF savings from the Singapore CPF Board.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11914930
Click to expand...

Deputy PM serves papers on Brendan Boyle
Isn't this KARMA in action ? - G R E A T ! As you sow, so shall you reap. Steal the CPF savings of Singaporeans and you will get your just rewards. John Key, oops, SIR John Key, is no longer there to protect your LIE - the BIG Lie of NZ. What did he get his knighthood for? For this -

You brought disgrace to the "Fair Go" name of NZ, so now you face the court music. :D NZ Justice has no fairness or principles - one nationality's CPF savings become a pension while John Key's CPF savings (oops, SIR John Key :rolleyes: )are tax-free and not a pension under the Section 70 regime. Equality is dead, the Bill of Rights Act, the Privacy Act and the Human Rights Act can all be discarded because the Chief Executive's ruling reigns supreme.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11941489

:);):cool::p:eek::oops:
 
Absurd High Court decision
Please watch the video and judge for yourselves - http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11944268

A small hire car company is to have one of its vehicles seized after an alleged fraudster registered it in his name to secure a large loan.

Despite being innocent in the matter, Green Cars Ltd, which runs Green Rental and the Battery Clinic in Otahuhu, has to give up its 2011 Toyota Prius because the man they hired it to, Vincente Lopez, used it as collateral to get a $46,000 loan from Pioneer Finance - a loan he defaulted on.

Being the losing party in a High Court hearing, Green Cars must also pay court costs.

The family business's manager, David Phan, was baffled by the decision.

"This guy's hired the vehicle, he's changed the registration to his name then waltzed down to the finance company and got finance on it.

"Now [Pioneer] has come after us trying to get the vehicle saying it's theirs."

"So if anyone gets wronged like us - even fraudulently so - you still lose the vehicle."

In her decision, Justice Christine Gordon said that in registering the vehicle in his name, Lopez did indeed have rights to the Prius. The agreement he'd entered into with Pioneer Finance was enforceable against a third party, she found.

This is NZ Law? :rolleyes:o_O:D:oops::confused:
 
FAILED by the justice system
Stephen Eruwera Dudley died on June 6, 2013 after he was punched repeatedly by two teenage brothers at a West Auckland rugby field. The boys were charged with manslaughter but the charge was later reduced to common assault. Both were discharged without conviction in court.
Earlier this year a coroner ruled that the brothers' actions were "the most significant factor" in Stephen's death - yet the police have refused to reinstate the manslaughter charge. Today, Stephen's parents speak exclusively to the Weekend Herald about their heartache, and being "failed" by the justice system.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11946777

No further action will be taken against the teen brothers involved in the death of West Auckland schoolboy Stephen Dudley, despite a coroner ruling they were directly responsible.
Stephen Eruwera Dudley died on June 6, 2013 after he was punched repeatedly by two brothers at a West Auckland rugby field.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11946944

:(
 
Crime epidemic
Crime Prevention Group president Sunny Kaushal, who represented small businesses and retailers, said the situation was getting out of control and he was hearing about attacks on dairy owners and workers almost every day.

Kaushal said the courts needed to take a stronger stance on these type of offenders so there was a bigger deterrent.

"They have no fear of the law, they have no fear of the police and no fear of being caught," he said.

"If you have seen the way they are attacking and assaulting the workers of small business in broad daylight in public areas, it tells you how fearless these offenders are. Because they know even if they get caught, the courts will let them go easily."

Dairy owner tells of worst attack to his family in 27 years -
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/crime/news/article.cfm?c_id=30&objectid=11948841

Dairy owner loses eye during Hamilton armed robbery
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/crime/news/article.cfm?c_id=30&objectid=11950403

Onehunga dairy owner 'thought she was going to die' as armed robbers break into store
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/crime/news/article.cfm?c_id=30&objectid=11949959
justice.jpg

 
Crimes and consequences: the cases that gripped NZ
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11950495

Please read "Witness C" -
At sentencing, Justice Christian Whata said the court case was "truly exceptional" and Witness C's lies were a "brazen assault on the foundation of our criminal justice system".

Acting prosecutor Richard Francois said Witness C's offending was the "most serious case of perjury that has ever come before the New Zealand courts".

"This verdict upholds the integrity of the justice system and the importance of the truth on the judicial process," he said.

When the courts rule that CPF savings for Singaporeans are pensions and allowances granted by the Singapore government but are private tax-free savings for Sir John Key and the thousands of Kiwis working in Singapore, is this the TRUTH?
 
Lies, lies and more damn lies

New Zealand’s relationship with Singapore

https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/countries-and-regions/south-east-asia/singapore/

Singapore and New Zealand have a close, collaborative relationship based on shared history and interests. There is strong economic complementarity between the only advanced small countries in the Asia-Pacific, and Singapore is among New Zealand’s top 7 markets for goods and services and source of tourists and investment.

In 2017 Singapore and New Zealand began negotiating an Enhanced Partnership that will significantly boost collaboration between the two countries in the areas of trade and economics, security and defence, people-to-people links and research, technology and innovation. This agreement will set a new benchmark for integration in the Asia-Pacific region, building on the 2001 Closer Economic Partnership (Singapore’s first FTA and New Zealand’s second).

Beyond economic relations, Singapore is New Zealand’s closest security partner in Asia. The Five Power Defence Arrangement underpins the regular exercising and training between our armed forces and the enduring presence of New Zealand defence personnel in Singapore (an army battalion was based in Singapore from 1969-1989).

There are multiple other strands to the relationship across education (500 Singaporeans study in New Zealand and many New Zealand students study in Singaporean universities), science (including jointly-funded projects) and public administration. Over 4000 New Zealanders live in Singapore, which is a South-East Asia hub for many New Zealand companies.

Tourism from Singapore is on the rise - more than 55,000 Singaporeans visited New Zealand in the 12 months to January 2017, a 15% increase from the previous year.

Free trade agreements with Singapore
We have a free trade agreement with Singapore:

And three regional free trade agreements that include Singapore:

We're also negotiating one more regional free trade agreement that includes Singapore:

In April 2017, our Foreign Ministers jointly announced negotiations towards a New Zealand-Singapore Enhanced Partnership:

  • The Enhanced Partnership will expand bilateral ties in four areas: trade and economic; science, technology and innovation; defence and security; and people to people links.
  • The first round of negotiations on the Enhanced Partnership took place in Wellington in July and the next round will be held in Singapore in October.
NZ Inc ASEAN strategy
As a member of ASEAN, Singapore is included in the NZ Inc ASEAN strategy. NZ Inc is the Government’s plan to strengthen New Zealand’s economic, political and security relationships with key international partners.

Find out more about the NZ Inc ASEAN strategy

Working Holiday Scheme
New Zealanders aged between 18 and 30 can apply for a six-month working holiday visa for Singapore.

Recent official visits
New Zealand to Singapore
  • January 2017: Prime Minister Bill English met Prime Minister Lee in Singapore
  • February 2017: Attorney-General Chris Finlayson visited Singapore
  • March 2016: Minister of Foreign Affairs Murray McCully met with his counterpart Dr Vivian Balakrishnan
  • July 2015: Governor-General Sir Jerry Mateparae paid a state visit
  • May 2015: Defence Minister Gerry Brownlee attended the 14th IISS Asia Security Summit, the Shangri-La Dialogue
  • May 2015: Prime Minister John Key met Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong
  • March 2015: Governor-General Sir Jerry Mateparae represented New Zealand at Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew’s funeral
  • March 2015: Associate Minister of Trade Todd McClay attended the New Zealand Technology Showcase held in Singapore
Singapore to New Zealand
  • April 2017: Foreign Affairs Minister Dr Vivian Balakrishnan visited Wellington and Auckland
  • October 2015: President Tony Tan paid a state visit
  • May 2015: Foreign Affairs Minister K Shanmugam met with his counterpart Minister Murray McCully in Wellington
  • January 2015: Minister of State for Defence Dr Mohamad Maliki Bin Osman visited Waiouru to observe Singapore Armed Forces troops participating in exercise Thunder Warrior
  • April 2014: Judicial Commissioner Tan visited Wellington for the Justice Symposium hosted by MP Judith Collins
So why does New Zealand discriminate against Singaporeans living in New Zealand?

The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development ruled that the Singapore CPF refunded monthly to Singaporeans is an allowance granted by the Singapore government, a payment and a pension. This is an absolute LIE as the CPF savings of one nationality, from the same CPF pot, cannot be a pension, payment or allowance granted by the Singapore government while the CPF savings of their ex-Premier, Sir John Key (http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11964176) is his own tax-free savings (as well as the CPF savings of thousands of Kiwis working in Singapore).

Does this verdict “uphold the integrity of the justice system and the importance of the truth on the judicial process?” https://www.sammyboy.com/threads/si...not-returning-their-cpf-savings.220849/page-8

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11950495 (article on Witness C). "This verdict upholds the integrity of the justice system and the importance of the truth on the judicial process," Acting Procecutor Richard Francois said.

Lies, lies and more damn lies

1. CPF is a pension

2. CPF is a periodic allowance granted by the Singapore government

3. “granted” simply means “made available” in the definition of NZcourts

4. CPF is a benefit

5. CPF refunds are “payments”

6. “Singapore is New Zealand’s closest security partner in Asia” – if this is how New Zealand treats Singaporeans, there certainly is a foul odour permeating this “close” relationship

Is this Chief Executive’s ruling a blatant LIE upheld and perpetuated as social security pension, benefit, periodic allowance and payment granted by the Singapore government? There have been many previous Chief Executives before as the CPF has been in existence since 1955. Why only under this Chief Executive and the National Party government under John Key has the CPF of 24 Singaporeans been confiscated by the New Zealand government?

Is there really integrity and truth in the justice system here in New Zealand?
 
The Singapore CPF Board should consider the following -

As more than 4,000 New Zealanders live and work in Singapore, therefore there are more than 4,000 CPF accounts to withhold and refund monthly after the age of 65, this will replenish the CPF coffers that have been depleted by the Singaporeans who have given up their Singapore citizenship, Singaporeans who have been indirectly forced to discard their red passports by the NZ government [contrary to the 1993 NZ Human Rights Act].

After all, there are only 24 Singaporeans discriminated by the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development, and NZ Labour government is considering treating Australians the same as New Zealanders are treated in Australia - FAIR is FAIR.:D
 
CPFscam said:
The Singapore CPF Board should consider the following -

As more than 4,000 New Zealanders live and work in Singapore, therefore there are more than 4,000 CPF accounts to withhold and refund monthly after the age of 65, this will replenish the CPF coffers that have been depleted by the Singaporeans who have given up their Singapore citizenship, Singaporeans who have been indirectly forced to discard their red passports by the NZ government [contrary to the 1993 NZ Human Rights Act].

After all, there are only 24 Singaporeans discriminated by the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development, and NZ Labour government is considering treating Australians the same as New Zealanders are treated in Australia - FAIR is FAIR.:D
Click to expand...

Every action begets a reaction
It is certainly a "Good deal" - 24 Singaporeans have their CPF savings stolen and thousands of Kiwis have their CPF savings detained until they are 65 years of age. It is simply a matter of time before Singapore quotes the NZ Ministry of Justice definition that CPF employer/employee contributions (Kiwisaver) are "pensions, benefits and allowances" and become "payments and periodic allowances" that are deductible from NZ Superannuation.

upload_2018-1-11_22-39-59.jpeg


Sir John Key was lucky to have collected his tax-free CPF savings which will not be considered for deduction from his NZ Super although the CPF savings of Singaporeans and the CPF savings of Kiwis come from the same CPF pot.
 
upload_2018-1-30_0-19-15.png
Donald Trump's ALTERNATIVE FACT has arrived in New Zealand[/QUOTE]
Singaporeans are hung out to dry by the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development (MSD)
The MSD pays out to Kiwis (like John Key), Malaysians, Filipinos, Indians, all other nationalities except Singaporean nationals.
The MSD pays out full Superannuation to ex-Singaporeans e.g. the President of the Singapore Club in NZ who has thrown away his Singapore passport.

Is this not DISCRIMINATION by NATIONALITY made LEGAL?
Click to expand...
 
New comment from Amazon/Kindle reader -
The Courts should not be influenced by the politicians in Parliament and support the perverse interpretation of an unprincipled Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development, who has the sole authority to rule Singapore CPF employee/employer savings are pensions, benefits and allowances only for one nationality, Singaporeans, but non-taxable personal savings for other nationalities e.g. Sir John Key.
Discrimination made legal indeed.

http://nzdiscrimination.blogspot.com.au/2018/02/discrimination-made-legal-in-new-zeeland.html
 
CPFscam said:
Discrimination made Legal - this is the link [the above link has been corrupted] -
https://www.amazon.com/Francis-Done/e/B079GWW2Z3/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1?qid=1538998589&sr=1-1
Click to expand...

This advertisement/flyer has been distributed to all households in Singapore (Population: 6.5 million) warning Singaporeans not to invest in NZ properties/or in business/or associate with people who discriminate - the Kiwis who worked in Singapore can collect their Singapore CPF savings tax-free, like John Key, but Singaporeans in NZ have their CPF savings stolen by the crooked Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development, Brendan Boyle. There have been previous Chief Executives before Brendan Boyle and ex-Prime Minister John Key, as the CPF savings scheme was started by the British government in 1955 when Singapore was a British colony - why didn't those Chief Executives rule the Singapore CPF is a pension? Answer: Because their parents taught them the difference between RIGHT and WRONG - unlike Brendan Boyle and John Key. The recent National Party filth made public by their own National MP, Jamie-Lee Ross, is proof of the rot of NZ under the National government, and the present Labour government is no better because they have betrayed the victims of Section 70 - Winston Peters asked for donations from retirees before the election promising to abolish Section 70, but now, he is hiding under the skirt of the PM who before she was elected stated on video record that Section 70 was unfair to law-abiding immigrants. Why is she silent and apathetic now? The Labour Manifesto of 2014 [page 9] also stated Section 70 was discriminatory and unfair.

DISCRIMINATION MADE LEGAL IN NEW ZEELAND

Warning to all Singaporeans

Do not move to New Zealand because the New Zealand government discriminates against Singaporeans. The NZ government will pay full pensions to all nationalities except Singaporeans as the monthly refund to Singaporeans by the CPF Board will be swallowed up by the NZ government’s Ministry of Social Development. This discrimination has been made legal by the NZ Court of Appeal as it denied the right of Singaporeans to proceed to the Court of Appeal after unfair decisions of the Social Security Appeal Authority and the High Court which substituted the word CPF “refund” to become “payment”, “periodical allowance” and pension”.

The Chairwoman of the Social Security Appeal Authority, who had a conviction for unfairness against her tenant (http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-pos...erty/8864917/Lawyer-ordered-to-refund-tenants) , ruled that, “[32] The appellant says the payment (refund) he receives is not a benefit or a pension. Section 70 refers to benefits, pensions and periodical allowances. The payment at issue in this appeal is a payment (refund) he is entitled to receive monthly. It is a periodical payment.

[33] The amount received by the appellant is paid (refunded) periodically and is payable on the appellant attaining a particular age. It is intended by the Singapore Government primarily to replace income on retirement or old age. We are in no doubt the payment (refund) the appellant receives constitutes a periodical allowance.”

[34] In addition, the New Zealand Oxford Dictionary defines “pension” as: 1. A regular payment made by a government to people above a specified age, to widows or to the disabled. The payments (refunds) made to the appellant also readily fall within a commonly understood meaning of “pension”.

Note: The appellant’s words “refunds”, which is the actual truth, had been substituted by the Social Security Appeal Authority with “payments”. This play on choice definitions of words is an affront to fairness, morality, principles and natural justice.

The High Court Judge Brewer (http://www.kiwisfirst.com/judge-file-index/high-court-justice-timothy-brewer/) in his judgement NZHC 711 of 11 April 2017) ruled, “[18] In my view, the Authority is correct. The appellant’s monthly payments (refunds) were made at an amount and frequency determined by Singaporean law regulating the CPF. It was certainly a periodical allowance. Whether the payments amount to a pension is more problematic. The payments were made by (or on behalf of) the Government of Singapore, but not from funds contributed by the public generally. Nevertheless, I characterise the payments (refunds) as a pension. They came from money collected by the Government compulsorily from the appellant and his employers.

From 1997-2001 he was a part-time Commissioner of the Law Commission.As a Crown lawyer, Justice Brewer was behind the unlawful cover-up of NZ Army culpability in the 1994 Te Rata (Berryman) bridge collapse which resulted in the wrongful death of beekeeper Kenneth Richards. Brewer had the engineer’s investigative report (the Butcher Report) into the collapse materially altered to expunge reference to the poor construction by the NZ Army just eight years earlier.Justice Brewer joined the Territorial Force of the New Zealand Army in 1976; appointed a member of the Courts Martial Panel of Advocates in 2001; Judge-Advocate from 2004-2009 and a Judge of the Court Martial of New Zealand from 2009. He retired in 2009 as Director-General Reserve Forces with the rank of Brigadier.Justice Brewer was appointed an Officer of the New Zealand Order of Merit in 2003.

The Court of Appeal (CA 235/2017 – NZCA 369) denied the right of Singaporeans to appeal against two unfair decisions of two, not 100% PURE NZ people, stating – Decision: “[12] The appellant did not confine his submissions on the leave application to the proposed questions of law. For example, he advanced submissions under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, the Privacy Act 1993 and Magna Carta. We will address only those submissions that are relevant to the specific questions of law for which leave to bring a second appeal is sought. [13] We accept the appellant’s submissions that the proposed appeal raises an issue of some potential general or public importance to the extent that other Singaporean citizens who are entitled to receive New Zealand Superannuation may also be affected by their entitlements under the Fund. However, for the reasons that follow, we are satisfied that the application for leave to bring a second appeal must be declined because it has no realistic prospect of success..... There is no appearance of error or of a miscarriage of justice.”

Conclusion: The end result is the same – Discrimination against Singaporeans by the New Zealand government, no matter how the judiciary defines CPF refunds, which their ex-Premier John Key and thousands of Kiwis who had worked in Singapore had collected their CPF savings tax-free.

The hijacked CPF savings of Singaporeans, refunded monthly, are “taxed 100%” by the New Zealand government and deemed a pension, payment, periodical allowance and a benefit, while all other nationalities retain their own savings tax-free.

The fact that Singapore discriminates against its own citizens is compounded by New Zealand which perpetuates this crime, despite their 1993 New Zealand Human Rights Act which clearly stated, discrimination by nationality, whether directly or indirectly is unlawful.

So Singaporeans should beware and not invest in a country that discriminates against them – just like this website warning immigrants - Yet the Singapore government sends its soldiers to New Zealand for training, has its fighter jets at an airbase here, and the GIC invested billions of CPF money in New Zealand’s “property bubble” market. It is about time that the Singapore government realises that New Zealand is indirectly forcing Singaporeans to discard their red passports and rapidly deplete the coffers of the Singapore CPF Board. If the New Zealand judiciary can define one nationality’s CPF savings as a pension, allowance, periodical payment and a benefit, other countries like the USA and Australia, may follow suit and soon, they may be a run on the people’s savings in the CPF Board, all started by New Zealand, which despite receiving large annual payments from the SAF/MINDEF, has no principles, conscience or gratitude and instead, discriminates against Singaporeans. This is the REAL New Zealand, not the slogan 100% PURE NZ it trumpets all over the world.

https://sites.google.com/a/nzpensionprotest.com/do-not-move-to-new-zealand/


Reference: https://www.sammyboy.com/threads/cpf-is-not-a-pension-fund.208837/page-6


https://www.amazon.com/Francis-Done/e/B079GWW2Z3/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1?qid=1518434664&sr=1-1

Discrimination made legal against Singaporeans, British, Irish, Germans, Swiss, Croatians, Americans and Canadians."
Read all about it -
https://www.amazon.com/-/e/B079GWW2Z3
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Why does Singapore require so much “foreign talent” when Singaporeans are so educated and smart? (Copied from Quora)
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
Scrooball (clone)
Scrooball (clone)
duluxe
Dutch deputy PM accused of felony for noting Muslim Jew-hate (the koran promotes hatred of infidels)
Replies
0
Views
151
duluxe
duluxe
dirtywoman
48% of S'poreans believe promoting women's equality has become discrimination against men: Ipsos study
Replies
5
Views
889
Dr Christopher Cheok C S
Dr Christopher Cheok C S
duluxe
Libya introduces morality police to crack down on women’s dress and ‘strange’ haircuts. Why is PAP disapproving for having our own morality police?
Replies
0
Views
145
duluxe
duluxe
S
Husband wife & baby move to NZ from Sinkiepore
2
Replies
36
Views
1K
syed putra
syed putra
Back
Top