• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious SG Special Forces soldier becomes a monk

Ralders

Alfrescian
Loyal
He is not asking for donations - yet.

Instead, he is begging for cheap attention and the adulation and adoration that he thought would come gushing his way.
I don't think leh.It serve no purpose to be a monk to gain attention.
 

Ralders

Alfrescian
Loyal
Very likely is press look for him for interview not the other way round.

It the faith in him for him to make a decision to be a monk.

He on pension he can continue what he doing don't to be tied down by all do and don't.

Make no sense
 

Ralders

Alfrescian
Loyal
Thank God no. This untrustworthy and vain peacock would have sold me out for his five minutes of cheap fame and publicity.
He charge u to db before.
U ooc by him.
U tekan by him before.
U were his team mate in ex thunderbolt.
 

Ralders

Alfrescian
Loyal
Here again, is my post in Msg 114:

View attachment 55158



That's not a surprise. That is why the OSA and code of professional silence to shut up is in place. One is formal and legal. The other is professional and informal.

Only the loudmouthed peacocks who want their five minutes of cheap fame for themselves will indulge in self-aggandisement and talk about their involvement publicly.
This chong teng kok reveal everything.
He a vainpot attention seeker?


26 MARCH 1991 9:50pm Barely 15 minutes after take-off, 114 passengers and nine crew members on Singapore Airlines flight SQ117 from Kuala Lumpur to Singapore found themselves in a terrifying situation. Four men armed with knives had taken control of their flight. This is a hijack! shouted the leader. In the cockpit of the Airbus A310, the captain quickly alerted Changi Airport Control Tower. 10pm At the Queensway Base of the Singapore Police Force’s Special Operations Command (SOC), Station Inspector Chong Teng Kok, 39, heard the alarm: Code Red (Confirmed): A hijacked Singapore Airlines flight has landed at Singapore Changi Airport. That day, the Officer-in-Charge (OC) of the troop was on leave. “By the luck of the draw, I was made covering OC of the troop!” recalls Mr Chong. Within moments, Mr Chong had gathered 39 SOC troopers and headed to the airport in a command vehicle, bus and Land Rover. Once there, they were directed to the runway where SQ117 now stood. The SOC troopers quickly cordoned off the plane and began monitoring the ground situation. Mr Chong stood guard at the tail of the plane. It was dark, and daylight was hours away.
 

Ralders

Alfrescian
Loyal
20190307_143702.jpg

This chong teng kok
 

PTADER

Alfrescian
Loyal
Where is the part he disclose identity of all involved.U seems to had grudges with him.

Don't be silly. Just because this little vain peacock is your little hero does not mean he is free from criticisms or that because I criticise him, I must therefore have "grudges with him" or that he is above the law or that the code of professional secrecy he has sworn to uphold suddenly does not apply to him.

Those who have been in the forum long enough would know that I am very much older to this young peacock. All I know of this vainpot is from the news articles about him where he choose to brag about himself. Maybe, this is the new Buddhism 2.0 like the Christians 2.0 with their prosperity gospel.

As to the issue of "identity", read what I wrote again. One of the problems I find amongst Sinkies is their inability to read critically, their poor comprehension skills and inability to understand language even when the language used is neither subtle nor nuanced, but fairly explicit.

1551939576200.png
 

Ralders

Alfrescian
Loyal
Don't be silly. Just because this little vain peacock is your little hero does not mean he is free from criticisms or that because I criticise him, I must therefore have "grudges with him" or that he is above the law or that the code of professional secrecy he has sworn to uphold suddenly does not apply to him.

Those who have been in the forum long enough would know that I am very much older to this young peacock. All I know of this vainpot is from the news articles about him where he choose to brag about himself. Maybe, this is the new Buddhism 2.0 like the Christians 2.0 with their prosperity gospel.

As to the issue of "identity", read what I wrote again. One of the problems I find amongst Sinkies is their inability to read critically, their poor comprehension skills and inability to understand language even when the language used is neither subtle nor nuanced, but fairly explicit.

View attachment 55160
OK.where is the part he disclose the identity of all
 

PTADER

Alfrescian
Loyal
This chong teng kok reveal everything.
He a vainpot attention seeker?

Instead of googling and arguing away, why don't you simply write to the AG's Office and MINDEF and ask them to explain to you about the OSA?

Also, please write to the Chief Commando Officer, COL Kenny Tay <<[email protected]>> to get him to explain to you about the Code of Conduct and what "professional secrecy" is about?

While I would prefer you to ask and write directly to the Commander of the SOF, his identity and email address, unlike the Chief Commando Officer, is classified. Sorry for not being able to help out in this respect.
 

PTADER

Alfrescian
Loyal
OK.where is the part he disclose the identity of all

Which part of my Message 114 did you fail to understand????????

Read it again slowly and try to understand it before asking me the same question. To make it easy for you, I have highlighted the relevant portions in bold and in red. If you still don't understand what I wrote, try to get someone to help you.


Extract of Msg 114

He has breached Section 5(1)(e)(i) & (iv) of the Official Secrets Act, not about the hijack which everyone knew about, but by providing the identity of who participated in it (himself).

From that one useful lead, revenge attacks may follow.

Hopefully, any revenge attack is targeted only at him only and not at others, especially his fellow SOF troopers whose identity can now be easily uncovered by those bent on revenge having been given one useful lead from this egoist and vainpot.
 

Ralders

Alfrescian
Loyal
Instead of googling and arguing away, why don't you simply write to the AG's Office and MINDEF and ask them to explain to you about the OSA?

Also, please write to the Chief Commando Officer, COL Kenny Tay <<[email protected]>> to get him to explain to you about the Code of Conduct and what "professional secrecy" is about?

While I would prefer you to ask and write directly to the Commander of the SOF, his identity and email address, unlike the Chief Commando Officer, is classified. Sorry for not being able to help out in this respect.
What wrong with u?
U saying he disclose the identities of all .
But where is the report ?

Follow by u accused Fred will put his teammates life in danger.
Then I show u this chong teng kok.
Disclose more details.

Then u reply with the shit on top.
Are u sick in the mind ?
U midlife crisis coming to an end soon?

Since u are above 60 years old.
Why u keeping harping about he vainpot he do it for reason he like Kong hee he ask for donation ......Above is only your own perception.There is nothing absolutely nothing to support your accusation.

Fred want to be monk.It his own personal way to experience life.Let him be it his entitlement.No one has right to interfere other life not to mention groundless accusations.

U senile or dementia ?
U like a jealous 老玩童。
 

Baccara77

Alfrescian
Loyal
What wrong with u?
U saying he disclose the identities of all .
But where is the report ?

Follow by u accused Fred will put his teammates life in danger.
Then I show u this chong teng kok.
Disclose more details.

Then u reply with the shit on top.
Are u sick in the mind ?
U midlife crisis coming to an end soon?

Since u are above 60 years old.
Why u keeping harping about he vainpot he do it for reason he like Kong hee he ask for donation ......Above is only your own perception.There is nothing absolutely nothing to support your accusation.

Fred want to be monk.It his own personal way to experience life.Let him be it his entitlement.No one has right to interfere other life not to mention groundless accusations.

U senile or dementia ?
U like a jealous 老玩童。
I believe PTADER didn't say Fred revealed the "identities of all". He said "revealing the identity of who participated", and that includes Fred himself.

I don't think Chong revealed the identities of the troopers.
 

Ralders

Alfrescian
Loyal
U saying he by providing the identity of who participated in it (himself) will lead to the revenge of his teammates.
But he didn't revealed who his teammates was.

When u told me your age .
It confirm u are either senile or demantia.

Base on this fact u might be sick without yourself knowing.

I won't continue disputing with u.
It is clear cut isn't it.
 

PTADER

Alfrescian
Loyal
He charge u to db before.
U ooc by him.
U tekan by him before.
U were his team mate in ex thunderbolt.

It's far worse than all that you listed. I was sentenced to death but on appeal, my death penalty was commuted and I was incarcerated in Changi prison for 25 years - 2 years more than Chia Thye Poh. It's all because of him. Hence, my "grudges" against him.

Please understand that unlike him, I am not a monk. Hence, I am unable to simply forgive and forget.
 

Ralders

Alfrescian
Loyal
I believe PTADER didn't say Fred revealed the "identities of all". He said "revealing the identity of who participated", and that includes Fred himself.

I don't think Chong revealed the identities of the troopers.
Don't understand.
Why he claim all his teammates may be targeted as revenge because of him.
Why he claim Fred is vainpot peacocks.
Why he compare Fred to Kong hee.
 

Ralders

Alfrescian
Loyal
It's far worse than all that you listed. I was sentenced to death but on appeal, my death penalty was commuted and I was incarcerated in Changi prison for 25 years - 2 years more than Chia Thye Poh. It's all because of him. Hence, my "grudges" against him.

Please understand that unlike him, I am not a monk. Hence, I am unable to simply forgive and forget.
So u saying I am right to say u had grudges with him.
U had an axe to grind and u knew him personally.

So what happened why u nearly sentence to death.

U mentioned u older than him.
 

Ralders

Alfrescian
Loyal
It's far worse than all that you listed. I was sentenced to death but on appeal, my death penalty was commuted and I was incarcerated in Changi prison for 25 years - 2 years more than Chia Thye Poh. It's all because of him. Hence, my "grudges" against him.

Please understand that unlike him, I am not a monk. Hence, I am unable to simply forgive and forget.
U served in changi for 25 years...
Serious ....U got caught in possession of drug by him?
 

PTADER

Alfrescian
Loyal
But he didn't revealed who his teammates was.

You need to brush up on your very poor comprehension skills.

Once again, and this time in even bigger font (26 is the biggest font size) and for added measure, underlined as well. I hope my hard work with the font, colour and underlining helps:

"From that one useful lead, revenge attacks may follow.

Hopefully, any revenge attack is targeted only at him only and not at others, especially his fellow SOF troopers whose identity can now be easily uncovered by those bent on revenge having been given one useful lead from this egoist and vainpot."
 

Ralders

Alfrescian
Loyal
You need to brush up on your very poor comprehension skills.

Once again, and this time in even bigger font (26 is the biggest font size) and for added measure, underlined as well. I hope my hard work with the font, colour and underlining helps:

"From that one useful lead, revenge attacks may follow.

Hopefully, any revenge attack is targeted only at him only and not at others, especially his fellow SOF troopers whose identity can now be easily uncovered by those bent on revenge having been given one useful lead from this egoist and vainpot."
U need to see a doc.
 

Ralders

Alfrescian
Loyal
You need to brush up on your very poor comprehension skills.

Once again, and this time in even bigger font (26 is the biggest font size) and for added measure, underlined as well. I hope my hard work with the font, colour and underlining helps:

"From that one useful lead, revenge attacks may follow.

Hopefully, any revenge attack is targeted only at him only and not at others, especially his fellow SOF troopers whose identity can now be easily uncovered by those bent on revenge having been given one useful lead from this egoist and vainpot."
U have an axe to grind with him.
1.u tell us what is your grudes with him.
2.u keep going round in round without any report or anything to support your accusations.
3.u trying to distort facts because of your past grudges with him.

To sum it up.
U can either share with us what happened
Why u spent 25 years in changi prison because of him which is more appropriate.
It is likely drug case .

Or u can find report to support your accusations.

U peh hoon Kia.?
 
Top