actually, I ran across a report that mild weight gain leads to longer lives. not 2x for sure. wait. I go and dig for it...
ah... obesity risk paradox.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813817/
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Rolex Submariner 116610LN - Full Review ONE whole HOUR!
- Thread starter Leongsam
- Start date
ah... obesity risk paradox.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813817/
Thanks for the tip. I've been looking at it for a long time. Am actually quite pantang about someone else's watch. Who knows what bad vibes it has? Maybe on day I'll get over it and make the leap. If I know it's been worn by someone I respect, I'll buy it in a heartbeat.(wink, wink)
just please don't quote me crazy prices...
I'm not selling because the watch has too much history and stores too many memories for me. It will probably follow me to my grave.
The chrono24 site allows you try on the watch by giving you an option to configure your wrist width and see whether it looks right.
My wrist is only 5cm so the 42mm explorer II looks too chunky on me. I think the limit for me is probably 39/40mm.
Thanks for the tip. I've been looking at it for a long time. Am actually quite pantang about someone else's watch. Who knows what bad vibes it has? Maybe on day I'll get over it and make the leap. If I know it's been worn by someone I respect, I'll buy it in a heartbeat.
just please don't quote me crazy prices...
How about this 34mm "unworn" https://www.chrono24.com/rolex/date-ref-115200--id15796888.htm
Thanks, interesting paper. But it didn't state old age. All else being equal, being slimmer and having a lighter weight will cause the heart to work less hard. That's my logic.
Of course your wrist is 5cm lah, you eat like a church mouse.I'm not selling because the watch has too much history and stores too many memories for me. It will probably follow me to my grave.
The chrono24 site allows you try on the watch by giving you an option to configure your wrist width and see whether it looks right.
My wrist is only 5cm so the 42mm explorer II looks too chunky on me. I think the limit for me is probably 39/40mm.
Where did u get this China style plate in NZ
boss, WTF!
You trying to starve yourself to death?
that's not the original paper I found though. I can't find it and my memory as you well know is crap. There was one with age in it.... But as far as the heart is concerned, I agree with you.Thanks, interesting paper. But it didn't state old age. All else being equal, being slimmer and having a lighter weight will cause the heart to work less hard. That's my logic.
no worries. I perfectly understand. Which is why I shoulda bought one myself ages ago. *facepalm* of course I couldn't resist giving it a good old fashioned try anyway...I'm not selling because the watch has too much history and stores too many memories for me. It will probably follow me to my grave.
The chrono24 site allows you try on the watch by giving you an option to configure your wrist width and see whether it looks right.
My wrist is only 5cm so the 42mm explorer II looks too chunky on me. I think the limit for me is probably 39/40mm.
the 115200 series just has that clunky look. Something about the shoulders doesn't sit right with me. I wish I could put my finger on it. The one you have 15200 blends with your wrist. Lacking the ability to go back in time, I've been considering the 39mm...
I've got a 42 and 40 and a 38. 42 is too clunky and a 38 is barely passable. I like the explorer II too. But why oh why 42? If it was the 39mm, then I may bite. And I can't stand the black face 39 explorer. Something about black faces that really turns me off.
If I can find an unworn 15200....
oooo.... that's a looker... don't make them like they used to.
Thanks. I can't take good photos of still life, really suck at it.
sam is pretty darn good. he can give you a few tips I'm sure. A quick glance at your photo tells me your lighting is "off". Couldn't tell you what you should do for sure, but you only have 1 point source. I think you need a better or more sources of light to do well with still life.
or maybe this
I am verifiably an amateur though so really sam is the man to ask.
Your dinner is 2 dumplings????
oh.. have never tried to photograph a watch. I'll take your highly-skilled opinion on it.
I guess if I think about it it makes sense. Silly thing is designed to catch and reflect light. Jewellery for men. Most surfaces absorb or don't reflect light. I guess you really have to be sophisticated at it.
I have a correction to make the 15200 is 34mm.
May I know how often do you send your Rolex for service and what is the cost ?
Similar threads
