okay, fair enough.
I've also just tested it for my very first time "ignoring" a member (i.e.
@ginfreely); but shortly after that, I
un-"ignored" her! :p
But what about
guests? They
can't "ignore" any member's threads, right?
What if
ALL regular/active members (or even better,
ALL members) were to "ignore"
@ginfreely; or even better again, what if it's possible for
@Leongsam (or even just you) to
force all members to "ignore"
@ginfreely?
She would soon realize that
nobody is bothering to
reply to her, so she'll just keep starting
new spam threads or replying to her
old spam threads until
nearly the whole of the
first page (or even first two or three pages) of the
Courtyard sub-forum are filled with her
spam threads that
only she and guests can see, right?
But
all other members would be
deceived into thinking that
all the threads (
none of which are started by
@ginfreely) they are seeing on the first few pages of the Courtyard sub-forum are what the
vast majority (i.e.
guests) of visitors:
sammyboy.com/online
are seeing, right?
So for example, if starting from
before two nights ago, all members (including you and even
@Leongsam) were already "ignoring"
@ginfreely, then by now, even though
none of us can see any threads started by her, the
guests (who constitute the
vast majority of visitors) would be wondering why
nearly all the threads they are seeing on the
first page of the Courtyard sub-forum
every evening until early morning are started by her, especially since her threads are
usually spammed with
her lies and/or nonsense, even if she were to start her threads with
deceptive titles to
attract guests to click on them and read her
spam posts.
Is that what
@Leongsam and/or you
really want to happen to this forum?