Opposition-bashing in "Opposition unity" forum

[char_jig_kar]

I really don't know. How I wish there is some opposition in Parliament to check on these suckers !

The problem is, even if WP manage to get a few MPs there, will they dare to challenge the PAP.

Low and Sylvia's performance so far have been disappointing. They ask all kinds of stupid, irrelevant questions and keep quiet when there are pressing questions to ask like the Town Councils' investment loss and now GIC's loss.

i will not vote for PAP, 'cause i loathe this political party. they made me sick.

as for the Opposition, i had made up my mind. i will not vote for any of them, if they don't put in any effort. i voted for the... SDA (or NSP?) i think in 2006. but i regreted it. why? 'cause i didn't see their shadow at all at my area! i every weekend go to the town centre to buy grocery. i didn't hear them, i didn't see them, i didn't see no pamphlet, they didn't come knocking on my door, etc. so thats it. enuf. i am not going to vote for any of the opposition if they dont buckle up.

not to talk about those bunch of guniang WP. who has identity crisis.

 

[Perspective]

if u are a opposition supporter, u don't give passing grade to the ruling party. simple as that.

i am not sucking up to the PAP. i didn't give them ASSING GRADE. i think they failed miserably.

u are not using my argumenet against me. u are just being unreasonable.

Finally got you to say that the PAP "failed miserably". That was something you tried to avoid or maybe I was wrong and that you had difficulty expressing it.

The fact is, as I said, the PAP hasn't "failed miserably" or not many people think so. That doesn't mean they have no shortcomings.

A teacher can fail anyone, even a student of Alan Greenspan's ability, if he biasedly wants to.

 

[leetahbar]

Ng E-Jay, why must you register 20 nicks just to bash my beloved instrument Leetahbar?

To ashamed and too cowardly to log in using your real name?

Too cowardly to whack WP using your real name?

What happened to that brave guy who wrote to ST forum bashing WP?

LOL!

You have no future in politics, Mr Ng. Whoever stands in an election with you will lose his or her deposit. No one will dare touch you with a 10 foot pole.

You have lost the respect of all the opposition parties, and the whole of civil society.

You have absolutely no future in the political arena, Mr Ng.

Or should I call you ... guavatree?

LOL!!!!!!

God Meng Seng

seriously. u think he's also hijacked my li'l brother LEETAHSAR's name. HE IS REALLY ALL THOSE CLONES??

wow piang!! serious or not?

 

[Ramseth]

Char Jig Kar,

You must be staying in one of the ghost towns in Punggol-Pasir Ris, yes?

 

[leetahbar]

Char Jig Kar,

You must be staying in one of the ghost towns in Punggol-Pasir Ris, yes?

if he's ejay the snake, then he slithers in BISHAN longkang la!

 

[commoner]

sometimes I wonder what you guys expect the opposition to do,,,,,

82 PAPs against 2 Opps.... In an open karaoke sessions, I pity the two guys who must wait in turns to speak,,,, whenever they speak, it may and probably not shown on TV most of the times (or only maybe in bad light) or the shitty times. In the parliament, the speaker of the house may control the items to speak of and time frame,,,,,

1 Opps speak, at least 5 Puppies came barking,,,, distracting the gist of the topics,,,

If we can have another 5-10 Opps, that would be nice to see how the Opps perform,,,

Anyway, even should PAP lost the election, Singapore will not die, the reserves will not disappear like LKY said,,,, the Opps simply just need to pay good money to employ strategicians,,,,, what you guys think Shamugan born to become Law Minister, Tharman is Finance Minister,,, they need helps from their subordinates,,,, alll except Pinkie, who he believes he is a natural born leader because his father says so,,,,

Look ,,, when GCT becomes PM, Singapore did not collapse and withers, and when Pinkie become PM, well, he did not perform,,,,

So, dun worry if PAP is the next govt, even if they are not, Singapore will not die,,,

anyway none of the politicians is indispensible,,,, LKY, CST, GCT, PINKY all can wither and die, and Singapore will continue to prosper

 

[leetahbar]

remember this ( it's from the father):

IF U PUT A PINK CLOWN IN AN ORCHESTRA, THE MUSIC STILL PLAYS ON....

get the indirect hint?

 

[cleareyes]

but for the past 10-15 years, its just 2 seats. stuck. its just stuck to 2 seats. whats there to harp about?? stuck at hougang and potong pasir. they couldn't move forward.

so has any other opposition politicans or opposition political parties "won" anything for the past 10-15 yrs?

I do not see either Low or Chiam or any other of their supporters harping about the seats they had managed to keep.

The trend so far has been for many who are trying to discredit both Low and Chiam, harping about why are they only having two seats.

I believe you are doing so

 

[cleareyes]

take u and ramseth for example. i have to spend quite a number of posts here in this forum to u guys on the PAP signature english chauvinistic language policy. and for what?? u guys are suppose to be Opposition supporters, am i right? but u guys keep on finding excuse or defending PAP signature english as first language language policy. a policy which is un-multiracial in its core. shows that its a big problem the mindset of the opposition: most of the opposition camp had been brain washed by the PAP.

So your idea of an opposition is to oppose everything that PAP does, and so if PAP come out wioth something that saves lives, actually improve the livelihood of Singaporeans by ten-fold, are you going to oppose that too, even when some of these policies actually does benefit society as a whole, you are going to oppose it and demand such policies be removed because its from PAP?

 

[cleareyes]

its one of the few policies the PAP got it right. just one of the few. whats the big deal? i didn't give them passing grade like low thia khiang. and also, i am not a opposition leader.

wow.....After talking so much, you just dashed away all your responiblity by saying you are not an opposition leader.

Thank god you are not a leader of any kind, your cohort would be a very pathetic one.

 

[scroobal]

sometimes I wonder what you guys expect the opposition to do,,,,,

82 PAPs against 2 Opps.... In an open karaoke sessions, I pity the two guys who must wait in turns to speak,,,, whenever they speak, it may and probably not shown on TV most of the times (or only maybe in bad light) or the shitty times. In the parliament, the speaker of the house may control the items to speak of and time frame,,,,,

During Davinder Singh terms in Parliament, he hardly spoke yet he was re-elected a number of times. He was not the only one.

In fact these chaps had a track record of keeping quiet.

Steven Chia gave LHL alot of headache especially where pay remuneration was concerned.

When it comes to the opposition, the demands are rather high.

 

[scroobal]

1. The article is contributed by an annonymous netizen.

2. I think it is a very good gesture for them to send a hamper to Seng which sends a strong message that opposition supporters are reasonable people and not uncouth gangsters hurling vulgarities are others.

3. That's better that some cheap blog which has been busy prostituting itself to the mainstream media to get the PAP's attention.

Wayangparty, Avantas, Limtuakang, thinknothing, sherylim etc has done so much damage for the opposition cause that it benefits the PAP. You are assuming that people can't follow what has been going on since the Ang Mo Kio coffeeshop incident which was fabricated by you.

 

[yellow_people]

Dear PAP Agent,

Davinder Singh was 're-elected' twice as a member of the Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC in 1997 and 2001. Both times by virtue of a walkover.

During Davinder Singh terms in Parliament, he hardly spoke yet he was re-elected a number of times. He was not the only one.

 

[scroobal]

Davinder Singh served 4 terms as an MP. He hardly said anything and one only has to check with the Hansard. Eunice Olsen was not even elected spoke more times and on important issues. Yet the GRC system allowed passengers to go thru.

Every vote against the PAP whether its for a donkey or an impressive candidate is a dent for the PAP.

A spoilt vote serves 2 purposes - definately helps the PAP hold on to power and second purpose is range of arguments which maybe justified to an individual but nevertheless helps the PAP retain seats. Ask Barisan.

Its the primary reason why the PAP has yet to bankrupt SDP but has kept it as a convenient vehicle to stop them moving on to other opposition parties or to create a new party. The shallow and the simpled minded without a piped piper will find change difficult and remain in familiar surroundings. The fastest way to trap a flock of mynahs is to place one in a large cage with a one way entry. The rest will be in no time.

The only other bigger idiot than the Mynah is Yaw who actually went on to vote for the PAP and told the world about it. Then again, he found it fit to join YPAP in the first place.

 

[char_jig_kar]

so has any other opposition politicans or opposition political parties "won" anything for the past 10-15 yrs?

I do not see either Low or Chiam or any other of their supporters harping about the seats they had managed to keep.

The trend so far has been for many who are trying to discredit both Low and Chiam, harping about why are they only having two seats.

I believe you are doing so

look at this thread. whenever people complain about how WP is sucking up to the PAP, or walk too damn close to the PAP, some others will counter it by stating that how Low and Chiam had seats in the parliament.

 

[char_jig_kar]

So your idea of an opposition is to oppose everything that PAP does, and so if PAP come out wioth something that saves lives, actually improve the livelihood of Singaporeans by ten-fold, are you going to oppose that too, even when some of these policies actually does benefit society as a whole, you are going to oppose it and demand such policies be removed because its from PAP?

i did praise PAP's strict gun control policy. if the policy is good, it doesn't matter whether its from PAP or Opposition. the problem is many of the PAP policies are fuck up, screw up policies.

 

[cleareyes]

look at this thread. whenever people complain about how WP is sucking up to the PAP, or walk too damn close to the PAP, some others will counter it by stating that how Low and Chiam had seats in the parliament.

and you are one of them, enough said.

 

[char_jig_kar]

wow.....After talking so much, you just dashed away all your responiblity by saying you are not an opposition leader.

Thank god you are not a leader of any kind, your cohort would be a very pathetic one.

dashed away my responsibility by saying i am not a opposition leader? of course i am not a opposition leader. a opposition leader would have to show his/ her face. i don't want to do that. i rather stay anonymous as a cyber lone kar (foot).

 

[char_jig_kar]

and you are one of them, enough said.

to me, it doesn't matter whether Chiam and Low have a seat in the parliament. the crux of the matter for me, is WP walk too damn close with the PAP. i have issue with that. thats why i brought it up here in this thread.

 

[scroobal]

the crux of the matter for me, is WP walk too damn close with the PAP. i have issue with that. thats why i brought it up here in this thread.

As long as you do not support the enemies or rivals of the PAP, the PAP will be delighted.

Not a good argument as the Barisan found out years ago. Hindsight is a wonderful tool if you can find it.