Opposition-bashing in "Opposition unity" forum

[God Meng Seng]

its like nazi and neo nazi party. wats the point? more or less the same.

FARK U KAN NIN NAH BEI CHAO CHEEBYE, U CALLED WP A NEO NAZI PARTY, U FARKING ASSHOLE.

MISTER NG E-JAY, WHY DON'T YOU LOG IN USING YOUR REAL NAME TO CRITICIZE WP? TOO SCARED to whack WP using your REAL NAME?

COWARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

GOD MENG SENG

 

[God Meng Seng]

the facts is for all to see, 2 in the past 15 yrs vs 0?

EXACTLY.

Don't be fooled by chap ji kar. He is a clone of the COWARD NG E-JAY, the stabber of opposition, THE ONE WHO BETRAYED HIS FRIENDS BY PLEADING GUILTY. He has more than 30 nicks in this forum at last count. All those bashing Leetahbar ARE ALL NG E-JAY'S CLONES. All those bashing WP ARE ALSO ALL NG E-JAY'S CLONES.

Don't respond to him, and keep your distance, and BEWARE!

God Meng Seng

 

[God Meng Seng]

bapok bob sim with your pap kangaroo courts anything can happen

Ng E-Jay, why must you register 20 nicks just to bash my beloved instrument Leetahbar?

To ashamed and too cowardly to log in using your real name?

Too cowardly to whack WP using your real name?

What happened to that brave guy who wrote to ST forum bashing WP?

LOL!

You have no future in politics, Mr Ng. Whoever stands in an election with you will lose his or her deposit. No one will dare touch you with a 10 foot pole.

You have lost the respect of all the opposition parties, and the whole of civil society.

You have absolutely no future in the political arena, Mr Ng.

Or should I call you ... guavatree?

LOL!!!!!!

God Meng Seng

 

[char_jig_kar]

Have you decided that supporting the PAP banning guns is sucking up to PAP?

its one of the few policies the PAP got it right. just one of the few. whats the big deal? i didn't give them passing grade like low thia khiang. and also, i am not a opposition leader.

 

[char_jig_kar]

FARK U KAN NIN NAH BEI CHAO CHEEBYE, U CALLED WP A NEO NAZI PARTY, U FARKING ASSHOLE.

MISTER NG E-JAY, WHY DON'T YOU LOG IN USING YOUR REAL NAME TO CRITICIZE WP? TOO SCARED to whack WP using your REAL NAME?

COWARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

GOD MENG SENG

siao eh. wrong number lah. i am not ng e-jay.

 

[Darkcloud]

its one of the few policies the PAP got it right. just one of the few. whats the big deal? i didn't give them passing grade like low thia khiang. and also, i am not a opposition leader.

At the end of the day, better to vote for WP, NSP, SPP, than those who change t-shirt then plead guilty and SABO KING Ng E Jay of SDP!!

 

[God Meng Seng]

][/SIZE]At the end of the day, better to vote for WP, NSP, SPP, than those who change t-shirt then plead guilty and SABO KING Ng E Jay of SDP!!

Well done, my Instrument!!

Bravo!!!!!!!!

God Meng Seng

 

[char_jig_kar]

At the end of the day, better to vote for WP, NSP, SPP, than those who change t-shirt then plead guilty and SABO KING Ng E Jay of SDP!!

Ng E Jay from SDP is a sabo king? HAHHAHA!!! Is he SDP CEC?? LOW THIA KHIANG, SYLVIA, YSL AND THE WP LOT LAGI SABO KING! LOL!!!!

Vote for this bunch of PAP clone from WP might as well just vote for PAP! LOL!!!

 

[denzuko1]

those who had criticised about other opps parties particularly wp and nsp where ltk n gms dwell, have yet to affirm or reveal to everyone whether they were members of SDP.

when they brag about "supporting opposition", do they mean only support SDP which is facing extinction and then discredit other opp parties?

from observation, they seemed to be ostracising or mocking other opp parties other than SDP which is the biggest clown circus here.

but do we ever hear them admitting they are sdppies?

First of all, SDP need to change its name to BP, Bankrupt Party. Second, haven't they noticed how desastrous their campaign is? They were the worst performing bunch with barely of 24% of the vote in Sembawang, this result comes from their challenge to Khaw Boon Wan on NKF issue. Should it be WP or SDA at the time, the result will be much better.

Haven't they learn that people are not really rejecting the opposition? LTK, SL, CST and many of those who participated in the past elections were hailed. I don't recall anyone hailing SDP for doing a good job.

So now that they can't win over PAP's supporters, they turn their target to their old allies? Seems like they are back with their old tricks, pull a fast one and being oppotunistic.

 

[char_jig_kar]

First of all, SDP need to change its name to BP, Bankrupt Party. Second, haven't they noticed how desastrous their campaign is? They were the worst performing bunch with barely of 24% of the vote in Sembawang, this result comes from their challenge to Khaw Boon Wan on NKF issue. Should it be WP or SDA at the time, the result will be much better.

Haven't they learn that people are not really rejecting the opposition? LTK, SL, CST and many of those who participated in the past elections were hailed. I don't recall anyone hailing SDP for doing a good job.

So now that they can't win over PAP's supporters, they turn their target to their old allies? Seems like they are back with their old tricks, pull a fast one and being oppotunistic.

Yeah yeah, LTK, Chiam, SL they are getting hailed... SO?! STILL TWO FUCKING PATHETIC SEATS! LIKE I SAID, STOP WANKING LAH! DON'T KEEP ON MASTURBATE ON THE TWO SEATS LAH! WAKE UP!

 

[Avantas]

Dear Locke,

Much as I have my misgivings about WP, I must admit they stand the best of winning a GRC.

It's between the devil and the deep blue sea.

Would I prefer to have 84 PAP MPs in Parliament or 79 PAP MPs and 5 WP MPs to check on them ?

Of course given a choice, I would prefer to vote in Dr Chee, but he is bankrupted and barred from future elections.

The severe limitation of choices show how pathetic Singapore politics has become.

Yes, I have become so desperate that I will cast my vote for WP, not because I support their wishy-washy kuniang style, but because there is really no other alternatives !

Dear Chap

Like some other well known individuals the context of that " passing grade " remark has to be understood. Firstly politics is never black or white, never pure and impure.

You are perfectly entitled to the view that anyone giving a passing grade to the PAP has not fulfilled the role of the opposition but to be fair you have to remember the second half of his statement whereby he condemned certain actions and policies of the PAP which resulted in his view a passing grade not a failure but nevertheless a STEP down from the A plus A plus the PAP grades itself.

Secondly for one whilst there may be people enough who want to give the PAP a failing grade, they will never represent the middle of the political spectrum, It is the difference between I hate the PAP and disagree with the PAP on everything they do including how LHL and LKY scratch their nose and their respective choice of tie and shirt color and the more middle of the road disagreements which run the gamut from well I like the PAP in some areas but disagree over others and I seek a balance between the two.

Ideological purity has never won votes in Singapore and more so in a GRC context if the aim remains to win enough to win a GRC. Chiam won with a moderate tone of opposition which he himself has alluded to and which LTK has followed. It collapsed with the SDP losing seats on the tail end of more aggressive policies,with the WP under JB showing better promise which alas was not fulfiled

JBJ has won on the strength of total unbending opposition but has not been able to convert it to any substantial parliamentary strength. In fact the highest seats in 1991 was won with the SDP( under chiam ) and LTK on a policy of moderate opposition and ground work.

Does unbending total opposition win the middle ground ? I have my doubts because the SDP has proven weak electorally. JBJ might have changed the equation but he has moved on and what remains is the need for both approaches to try and not just one.




Locke

 

[char_jig_kar]

Dear Locke,

Much as I have my misgivings about WP, I must admit they stand the best of winning a GRC.

It's between the devil and the deep blue sea.

Would I prefer to have 84 PAP MPs in Parliament or 79 PAP MPs and 5 WP MPs to check on them ?

Of course given a choice, I would prefer to vote in Dr Chee, but he is bankrupted and barred from future elections.

The severe limitation of choices show how pathetic Singapore politics has become.

Yes, I have become so desperate that I will cast my vote for WP, not because I support their wishy-washy kuniang style, but because there is really no other alternatives !

you have another choice. you could void your vote.

 

[Avantas]

1. The article is contributed by an annonymous netizen.

2. I think it is a very good gesture for them to send a hamper to Seng which sends a strong message that opposition supporters are reasonable people and not uncouth gangsters hurling vulgarities are others.

3. That's better that some cheap blog which has been busy prostituting itself to the mainstream media to get the PAP's attention.

A very good post by hamper.com. One who hasn't proven the words he quote from WP members that are plucked from the air, scenarios plucked from air, everything plucked from air, rewrites history and facts, then sends Seng a hamper.

 

[Avantas]

I really don't know. How I wish there is some opposition in Parliament to check on these suckers !

The problem is, even if WP manage to get a few MPs there, will they dare to challenge the PAP.

Low and Sylvia's performance so far have been disappointing. They ask all kinds of stupid, irrelevant questions and keep quiet when there are pressing questions to ask like the Town Councils' investment loss and now GIC's loss.

you have another choice. you could void your vote.

 

[Ramseth]

Low and Sylvia's performance so far have been disappointing. They ask all kinds of stupid, irrelevant questions and keep quiet when there are pressing questions to ask like the Town Councils' investment loss and now GIC's loss.

I saw that it was Sylvia's pressing on that led to MOS Finance Lim H.H. to reveal the figure of 41% loss by GIC. Stupid and irrelevant questions? I do see the relevance your point though. Nevermind, whatever the WP does, says or asks is stupid and irrelevant to some people, I understand.

 

[yellow_people]

Yes, I have become so desperate that I will cast my vote for WP, not because I support their wishy-washy kuniang style, but because there is really no other alternatives !

This is your choice but if you do decide on voting for wishy-washy candidates in the upcoming elections out of desperation do not be surprised to see even more wishy-washy opposition candidates in future elections.

 

[Perspective]

Now you know why the PAP will never bankrupt the SDP. As long as it exist, it keeps their supporters from voting for any other oppostion party. Jufrie spends all his waking hours condeming the "approved" opposition parties that it helps the PAP.

You can bring a donkey to a water trough but you can't make it drink.

A perfect strategy I must say. To onslaught an opposition party would seem too much like doing PAP's job, so someone came up with an eureka - link that opposition party to the PAP and onslaught it on the pretext of onslaughting the PAP. No strategy could have been better.

Maybe we can try this on all the opposition. Sing WP=PAP, SDP=PAP, NSP=PAP, SPP=PAP. In the end, PAP voters will vote PAP, opposition voters will vote PAP. A loss of all opposition seats minus 20% of the votes with several lost deposits. Classic.

 

[Perspective]

I saw that it was Sylvia's pressing on that led to MOS Finance Lim H.H. to reveal the figure of 41% loss by GIC. Stupid and irrelevant questions? I do see the relevance your point though. Nevermind, whatever the WP does, says or asks is stupid and irrelevant to some people, I understand.

More scenarios plucked out from air. We must have forgotten this and how several PAP MPs had to tackle LTK. Those were figments of our imagination.

 

[Perspective]

its one of the few policies the PAP got it right. just one of the few. whats the big deal? i didn't give them passing grade like low thia khiang. and also, i am not a opposition leader.

If it's no big deal you had to start a new thread on it. Sure. What should I say next, whether few policies right or many policies right, that is sucking up to PAP?

I also don't care if you are opposition leader or not, as long as you are pro-opposition, you shouldn't be sucking up to PAP. I'm just using your arguments against yours.

 

[char_jig_kar]

If it's no big deal you had to start a new thread on it. Sure. What should I say next, whether few policies right or many policies right, that is sucking up to PAP?

I also don't care if you are opposition leader or not, as long as you are pro-opposition, you shouldn't be sucking up to PAP. I'm just using your arguments against yours.

if u are a opposition supporter, u don't give passing grade to the ruling party. simple as that.

i am not sucking up to the PAP. i didn't give them PASSING GRADE. i think they failed miserably.

u are not using my argumenet against me. u are just being unreasonable.