- Joined
- Oct 24, 2010
- Messages
- 32,792
- Points
- 113
Now then you know Singapore police best!
S'pore police not best. They are 'bestest'.
Now then you know Singapore police best!
What is your basis for saying that SAR HK police is better than SPF?
You lived there for many years and understand the situation?
Based on newspaper and press reports?
Someone who understands told you?
Have you read about the case a few years ago where a HK policeman shot and killed 2 of his colleagues in an underground pedestian crossing in TST?
Have you read about the case a few years ago where a HK policeman shot and killed 2 of his colleagues in an underground pedestian crossing in TST?
The problems with JBJ, TLH and CSJ were largely self-sought. The defamation laws are there. Even PAP MPs has to abide by it. The only case I consider unfair was the JBJ disqualification from MP in 1986, but it was high politics and personal politics by LKY, not the police. The JBJ 2000 defamation and disqualification from NCMP case, frankly, he asked for it. Anyway, it was a civil case, not a police case. The police even approved the YCK Stadium permit for him to host the Save JBJ Rally.
S'pore police not best. They are 'bestest'.
Don't agree that the problems with TLH were largely self-sought.
but till today, many people don't understand how he is a chinese chauvinist.
Don't agree that the problems with TLH were largely self-sought.
It's true that he didn't back down, but till today, many people don't understand how he is a chinese chauvinist.
The other 2, although I admire them for different reasons and in varying degrees, agree to some extent that they could have averted many of their problems by doing things differently.
The branding of Chinese chauvinist on him by PAP was when TCH quoted his remark from a hi-soc dinner that Christians are sitting in sedans while Chinese are the sedan bearers. PAP and TCH maintained it was a true quote and challenged TLH to sue if he thought it wasn't.
TLH didn't sue but rebutted that he couldn't be a Chinese chauvinist for he's multilingually educated in Chinese, Malay and English, even involved in traditional Indian dance and his daughter is a Christian to which he never objected. PAP held its position, either TLH sued and let the court judge or as it was, let the voters judge. TLH didn't sue but made a police report that his life is threatened by the PAP remarks and even implied complicity of PAP in a conspiracy. PAP sued and he skipped the country.
JBJ was named as co-defendant for waving the report at the rally crowd. He had to stand alone to face the trial. He was fortunate that he got George Carmen QC to defend him (presumably pro bono) and got away with relatively light and non-bankrupting damages. There's more to the TLH saga, but for the Chinese chauvinist episode, that's it for now.
Do you see an invisible hand in all these?
On the contrary, it's a visible hand.
My point is, there was nothing to with police. If 3 m. citizens are cowered under the the hand, what could 10 k. police do? Don't vent it out unfairly on police or other civil servants who're just doing their legal duties.
On the contrary, it's a visible hand.
My point is, there was nothing to with police. If 3 m. citizens are cowered under the the hand, what could 10 k. police do? Don't vent it out unfairly on police or other civil servants who're just doing their legal duties.
In countries like Thailand, Indonesia and Philippines police and army can control political and lawmaking decisions if they disgree with elected governments. You want that?
In countries like Thailand, Indonesia and Philippines police and army can control political and lawmaking decisions if they disgree with elected governments. You want that?
The invisible hand I am referring to is LKY's manipulation of the 1997 election campaign events.
have u read FS' book.."To Catch A Tartar"?
Yes I was referring to LKY's hand. Yes I've read that FS book. I was a young constable freshly out of PA when FS, TFH, TSL et al were arrested by ISD. What he described in his book is quite accurate, no exaggeration. But there's more, what he didn't describe in his book. I don't profess to know everything but I surely know more than that.
No, certainly I dont expect to compare SPF with the Thai, Indo and Philippines Police. We are not them..why compare with 3rd rate police?
I expect SPF to honour its mission, duty and calling.
Yes I was referring to LKY's hand. Yes I've read that FS book. I was a young constable freshly out of PA when FS, TFH, TSL et al were arrested by ISD. What he described in his book is quite accurate, no exaggeration. But there's more, what he didn't describe in his book. I don't profess to know everything but I surely know more than that.
Government (PAP) orders police do this or that with legitimate powers, can refuse? E.g. police commander thinks CSJ is alright to make a scene outside Parliament, ignore MHA orders to arrest and charge, is that what you expect? Mind you, CSJ was ex-police too, an ASP no less.
Government (PAP) orders police do this or that with legitimate powers, can refuse? E.g. police commander thinks CSJ is alright to make a scene outside Parliament, ignore MHA orders to arrest and charge, is that what you expect? Mind you, CSJ was ex-police too, an ASP no less.
Was rejecting a legitimate event application honourable?