Not really I'm just against mob rule.LoL, you LML's pr consultant is it??!!
There is no evidence that that the report was fraudulent.
Not really I'm just against mob rule.
Supposing I was missing something from my tool shed and my security cam captures one of my neighbors on my property yesterday. I suspect that my neighbor stole one my tools so I go to the police and file a report against the neighbor and show the police the footage.
The police view the footage and proceed with the prosecution.
During the trial the judge decides that there is insufficient evidence and acquits my neighbor so does that mean I should now be charged with filing a false police report? I don't think so.
This is a good and very important point which you raised.Who is the rightful employer? Is it LML?
You cannot say that you did not know. If you are the employer and you signed the contract with the terms it is binding. If someone else ordered the maid to do it without your permission you are still liable.
Unfortunately this is how the contracts work. Of course you can go to court to argue.
But so far it does not look like there are any other parties involved besides LML and his family.
Sure get his son to take the fall and say he was the one who ordered all that and he will take the blame for it.
Unfortunately does not seem applicable to PAP masters and their Apparatchiks.
insufficient evidence is different malicious intent. which is what Justice Chan is alluding to in this instance.
Hello, LML has neither admitted he was wrong nor apologised. He says he genuinely believes Parti is a thief and did his civic duty to make a police report against her. On the other hand he respects Chan J's decision where Chan J has determined that LML & family had an 'improper motive' to fix Parti.since when is there a rule that says if u apologize then automatically don’t need to explain? It’s like if u accuse your neighbor of fucking his dog. Then he sues u, and u apologize in court so don’t have to explain?
LoL, you really LML's pr consultant hot??!!!One judge found the maid guilty and upon appeal another judge said the evidence was not strong enough to convict. Not guilty does not mean the maid is innocent. It simply means there is insufficient evidence.
The case is about the maid's behavior and not her boss. The boss is not on trial here and the verdict should have no affect on his position in life.
You have clearly not read Chan J's 100 page decision.Not really I'm just against mob rule.
Supposing I was missing something from my tool shed and my security cam captures one of my neighbors on my property yesterday. I suspect that my neighbor stole one my tools so I go to the police and file a report against the neighbor and show the police the footage.
The police view the footage and proceed with the prosecution.
During the trial the judge decides that there is insufficient evidence and acquits my neighbor so does that mean I should now be charged with filing a false police report? I don't think so.
What rubbish.The maid is no angel she has a case pending against her for theft from other parties. The general public is in no position to pass judgement.
You have clearly not read Chan J's 100 page decision.
Parti's case is a clear cut miscarriage of justice, plain and simple. Shocking and disturbing to say the least.
The maid is no angel she has a case pending against her for theft from other parties. The general public is in no position to pass judgement.
LoL, this is exactly why DJ Olivia Low is now in a pickle. It has taken a senior High Court judge to put right a total clear case of miscarriage of justice.If the facts were so blatantly obvious the first judge would not have returned a guilty verdict. The evidence is therefore open to interpretation.
What rubbish.
Parti has been cleared and acquitted of all criminal charges. The remaining ones were withdrawn by AGC and Parti was given a full discharge amounting to an acquittal.
“I’m so glad that I’m finally free. I’ve been fighting for four years now and I have been strong all this while,” said Parti.
However, she will not be able to return immediately, as she still faces one pending charge for fraudulent possession of stolen items from unknown victims. Balchandani said that he was ready to challenge the charge.
LoL, guess you are just being your same old facetious self. Arguing for the sake of arguing to get more eyeballs and/or entertain yourself lamely.
LoL, guess you are just be your same old facetious self. Arguing for the sake of arguing to get more eyeballs and/or entertain yourself lamely.
Get with program. Parti's final charges were withdrawn by AGC earlier this week and she was discharged if all remaining criminal charges hanging over her head by DJ Eddy Tham, with an order if discharge amounting to a acquittal.
LoL, yeah right and pigs will fly.This case reeks of an orchestrated attempt to discredit an honorable man who has done so much for the country. It is an indication that LML posed a threat to those in high places.
Singaporeans should be very wary when a crooked maid suddenly becomes a pawn in a power struggle. I suggest you did deeper before adding your lame 2 cents to the discussion.
LoL, yeah right and pigs will fly.
Say what you will but there is a published High Court judgment which will carry on in perpetuity that holds LML to have improper motives against his maid.