• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Liew Mun Leong : "I Don't Retire! I Die!" Have You Bought His 4-Volume Book Of Emails For Staff Yet? Collector's Item!

I have read many judgements including one that says being inside a polling station is not the same as being within 100metres of one and that waving a police report during an election rally is defamation and that making a statement privately cannot be considered to be a private statement.

You believe judgements when they suit you and discredit them you don't. It's a fair game to play in politics but it won't fool me.
Your first eg btw was not a court judgment. It was the legal opinion of the AG at that time.

Anyways back to your main point, this is a generalisation copout.
 
View attachment 90665
JUSTICE CHAN SENG ONN

I'm more of interested on why the fallout or 'non cooperativeness' of this Chan SO with the elites because of this it feels like there's justice in SG but i honestly doubt so. I believe LML is made a scapegoat not that he is decent ofc that i know. Nobody is decent... none lol..........

There is not a single elite who deserves sainthood. We are all flawed characters in the eyes of our maker.

However I have been around long enough to know how the game is played.

The picture below is of Tan Wah Piao and Phey Yew Kok.

One party said that Tan instigated a riot and broke windows. The other party denied ever being part of or instigating any riots. I was there when the alleged offense took place and I know the truth first hand.

An elite went on to become a fugitive for decades. Tides can turn and so can fortunes.



1599809154225.png
 
Your first eg btw was not a court judgment. It was the legal opinion of the AG at that time.

Anyways back to your main point, this is a generalisation copout.

You're splitting hairs. The fact remains that GCT was never charged with breaking election day rules so it was more than just an opinion. It determined the course of justice.
 
This CB Kia Loofydralb like to talk big.

I already gave him a good fcuk.

Now, IGNORED.


:smile:
Funny how some who have no mental ability to counter argue will simply resort to ignoring (more like running away with legs between their tails). Like putting their heads in the sand and wish the problem doesn't exist.

Some have this schizophrenia that they were f**ing somebody.
 
A long time ago a certain TT Durai sued a good friend of mine Archie Ong for defamation. Ong was forced to issue a public apology and pay costs.

A decade on TT Durai, emboldened by support from high places, decided to take on the ST group. Unfortunately he met his match and more in a certain Bahyi Singh who was even better connected.

There are no absolute truths only opinions that matter and opinions that don't.
 
This fucker actually boasted that his banker told him that he can live off his interest and don’t have to work.

So rich but yet still so cheap. Can’t hire one more maid for his son? Haa.... these rich ppl all same kind.
Must be one of those humble background types. :cautious:
 
Chan's judgement was damning. Those who are still defending LML obviously aren't interested in facts as they were presented in the judgement. Chan did not simply say it was insufficient evidence. He struck a decisive blow at LML's integrity in pursuing his case against the maid.
Judge how cum no give chan one? :confused:
 
Chan's judgement was damning. Those who are still defending LML obviously aren't interested in facts as they were presented in the judgement. Chan did not simply say it was insufficient evidence. He struck a decisive blow at LML's integrity in pursuing his case against the maid.
That may be a probable reason for the MIW to maintain their silence.
 
It may or may not be a crime, and the Attorney General Chambers has the sole discretion whether oe not to charge him
How sole is the sole discretion? It really depends how the judge is connected to the accused. Sole discretion can be deem correct and incorrect. If he knows the correct sole discretion, there will be correct opportunities.
 
The judiciary system set up by PAP has always been fair. Oppies were hoping that the maid would go to jail so that they can continue to hurl abuse at PAP. Bet you didn't expect the maid to be vindicated and Liew to fall from grace despite having no resources and represented by a pro bono brahmin lawyer.
 
Where the fuck is this bastard Liew Mun Leong now? No press conference to address the public?

So what now? Just retire and get retirement payouts? Shouldn't this fucker be fired instead of allowing him to 'retire'?
 
He announced that he had brought forward his retirement.
Means that he will collect his retirement platinum handshake
even earlier?
 
A long time ago a certain TT Durai sued a good friend of mine Archie Ong for defamation. Ong was forced to issue a public apology and pay costs.

A decade on TT Durai, emboldened by support from high places, decided to take on the ST group. Unfortunately he met his match and more in a certain Bahyi Singh who was even better connected.

There are no absolute truths only opinions that matter and opinions that don't.
In Archie's case did it go all the way to a High Court judgment?

As for TT Durai's downfall. He actually brought it on himself as he was the Plaintiff against ST.

I agree gloves came off because Durai's guardian angel Mrs GCT no longer carried the imprimatur of being Mrs PM as well. And you are right Davinder Singh is the best legal advocate in Singapore.

But in TT Durai's case he did not lose merely because of opinions. He lost because of established facts against him, even to the extent of he himself admitting certain facts against himself.

As for the present Parti case. I don't think Chan J merely overturned DJ Olivia Low's judgment just on his opinion. It was based on the established facts as well. The break in chain of evidence which ultimately lead to Parti being rightfully acquitted.
 
That may be a probable reason for the MIW to maintain their silence.
No.

Tbf, law & home affairs minister Shan has publicly conceded that Chan J's judgment has shown a break in chain of evidence and some thing went wrong in the Parti case.

This is why Shan said that a proper review is required to establish what went wrong, why it went wrong and how to prevent this in future.
 
No.

Tbf, law & home affairs minister Shan has publicly conceded that Chan J's judgment has shown a break in chain of evidence and some thing went wrong in the Parti case.

This is why Shan said that a proper review is required to establish what went wrong, why it went wrong and how to prevent this in future.
OK
Thank you
 
Its thick with irony that he could not develop his own son from a leeching useless bankrupt lying cheating piece of shit but wants to develop others.

He is not a human being.He did not teach his son how to be a human being and he want to be a management guru to build people ? In fact,he will destroy people at all costs.
 
Back
Top