- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
- Messages
- 10,898
- Points
- 113
Yup. You're right. I just putting my effort out there in the hopes that I could try to prove that wrong in some small way.Human nature never changes people just find new ways to play the same game.
Yup. You're right. I just putting my effort out there in the hopes that I could try to prove that wrong in some small way.Human nature never changes people just find new ways to play the same game.
Great leader do not make emotional response like how MAMA Balakrishnan did.Whatever Ukraine or NATO did or could have done, he and Russia would still be untouchable until the end of his life. He had it all. After his entrance to Ukraine, he's now more touchable than ever. I don't understand his motivations other than as an emotional response.
I don't wish to make negative comments unecessarily.Great leader do not make emotional response like how MAMA Balakrishnan did.
That's highly illogical. NATO can expand all they want, they could never have take away Putin's position, power and wealth or Russia's sovereignty. Even if they stationed the entire Western nuclear arsenal in Ukraine would not make an iota of a difference to Putin or Russia.Attacking Ukraine is definitely a strategic response to NATO's intended expansion.
IMUHO, this is my view on Putin's long term goals:Your story is very intriguing. Why would he risks putting his country going into a deep recession with all the sanctions? Why would he wants to waste US$15bn per day of war when he could be able to occupy Donbas and Luhansk with much less fighting and won easily, like what he had done with his present occupied territories in Georgia?
Are you ok? You are acting like a grumpy old man. I hope I m not the cause for that.Some of these Russian Porlumpas are really very hypocritical. They have always complained that the SPH and Mediacorp are government propaganda and are bent on condemning their news no matter what. But today, these exact hypocrites are praising the Russian government medias. Isn't this double standards shown by these Russian Porlumpas? WTF? Ask yourself your truthfulness before condemning another. Pui, I have totally no respect for these Stinkies. They are worse than the 2 dogs above. As I've said many times before, Stinkies will always pawn Sinkies. That's what their motives are for living in Sinkie Land. These are the real CAQs, many times worse than Pinkie.
Why don't you ask yourself? I must have stepped on your doggie tail. I'm just speaking the truth which you just cannot accept. Does it affects you since you are reacting to my post?Are you ok? You are acting like a grumpy old man. I hope I m not the cause for that.
Retaliate what? I m against fake news. RT has so far reported stuffs exactly the same as what i got from my sources, contrary to what the fake MSM from the west (ST n Mediacorp equivalent) have been illustrating. Infact, I have posted alot more from my sources than RT. I have no idea what double standard you are talking about here. CNN, BBC and etc equal ST mediacorp.Why don't you ask yourself? Cannot retaliate what I've said?
So, only RT news are genuine? Your sources? Private ones? RT is a Russian government owned media and of course will never talk bad on their masters, which you've been advocating the same about what SPH and Mediacorp are to the Singapore government. Right?Retaliate what? I m against fake news. RT has so far reported stuffs exactly the same as what i got from my sources, contrary to what the fake MSM from the west (ST n Mediacorp equivalent) have been illustrating. Infact, I have posted alot more from my sources than RT. I have no idea what double standard you are talking about here. CNN, BBC and etc equal ST mediacorp.
RT is msm for the Russians. If you believe that msm is biased, then so too will RT be for Russia and Global Times be for China. msm has occasional fake news and occasional real news. Filter accordingly.Retaliate what? I m against fake news. RT has so far reported stuffs exactly the same as what i got from my sources, contrary to what the fake MSM from the west (ST n Mediacorp equivalent) have been illustrating. Infact, I have posted alot more from my sources than RT. I have no idea what double standard you are talking about here. CNN, BBC and etc equal ST mediacorp.
Rest assured that I m doing my due diligence with RT as well. So far, I think I am managing well.RT is msm for the Russians. If you believe that msm is biased, then so too will RT be for Russia and Global Times be for China. msm has occasional fake news and occasional real news. Filter accordingly.
This is nonsense. Sokdiers cannot use this.the great police defender andrew loh always says still for spf. Which is why he is blocked"I was only following orders" is known as the Nuremberg Defence. It was the excuse given by many nazis during the Nuremberg trials. Thankfully and rightfully so, the presiding judges rejected this as valid defence.
When one's intent is to be biased, they will say they've done no wrong lah.RT is msm for the Russians. If you believe that msm is biased, then so too will RT be for Russia and Global Times be for China. msm has occasional fake news and occasional real news. Filter accordingly.