-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
It's Official - TikTok made TurthSpeak smarter than All Of Us
- Thread starter k1976
- Start date
95% of people in Singapore are vaxtards.
Please have some IQ before you make a nonsensical claim lol.
Now you all should know why vaxtards are having low IQ and always jealous of the 5%
Please have some IQ before you make a nonsensical claim lol.
Now you all should know why vaxtards are having low IQ and always jealous of the 5%
You are viewing things from a human perspective and we all know that our brains can easily be fooled. What we consider to be "reality" is actually just our perception of what appears before us.
In order remove errors introduced by our perception of things we have to drill down the mathematics and all the equations point to the fact that the whole universe is indeed flat.
What is the shape of the universe?
News
By Elizabeth Rayne
published November 13, 2022
The universe may be vast, but researchers have multiple points of evidence that reveal its shape.
The universe may be vast, but researchers have multiple points of evidence that reveal its shape. (Image credit: Weiquan Lin via Getty Images)
The universe may seem shapeless because it is so vast, but it does have a form that astronomers can observe. So, what is it shaped like?
Physicists think the universe is flat. Several lines of evidence point to this flat universe: light left over from the Big Bang, the rate of expansion of the universe at different locations, and the way the universe "looks" from different angles, experts told Live Science.
David Spergel, a theoretical astrophysicist and emeritus professor of astrophysical sciences at Princeton University, has probed the shape of the universe for decades. In a 2003 study published in The Astrophysical Journal, Spergel measured irregularities in the cosmic microwave background (CMB), light left over from the Big Bang, that were observed by NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) and later by the European Space Agency's Planck spacecraft.
The amounts of positive and negative energy in a flat universe are exactly the same, and therefore cancel each other out. If the universe had a curvature, one would be higher than the other. "A flat universe corresponds to a universe with zero energy," Spergel told Live Science.
Related: How many atoms are in the observable universe?
In this case, the WMAP measurements of CMB fluctuations suggested the universe was both infinite and flat. Spergel also compared these measurements with those made by the European Space Agency's Planck spacecraft, which further constrained the possible shapes the universe could take.
"We can measure the curvature with some uncertainty, so we can say that the curvature is zero with some uncertainty," Spergel said. "While we can lower the uncertainty, we only at best constrain the geometry."
Evidence for the flatness of the universe also shows up in what's known as the critical density. At the critical density, a hypothetical universe would be flat and would eventually stop expanding, but only after an infinite time, according to the Swinburne University of Technology in Australia. If a hypothetical universe were denser than this, it would be curved like a sphere and eventually collapse in on itself due to its gravity — a proposed phenomenon known as the "Big Crunch."
RELATED MYSTERIES
—What's the coldest place in the universe?
—What is the smallest particle in the universe? (What about the largest?)
—How do we know the age of the universe?
But all measurements of our real universe suggest it is just below the critical density, meaning the universe is both flat and will expand indefinitely.
Yet another line of evidence suggests the universe is flat: It is isotropic, meaning it looks the same from every angle. Anton Chudaykin, a physicist at the Institute for Nuclear Research in Russia, and colleagues looked at the data on oscillations in regular, or "baryonic," matter, as well as models of how atomic nuclei heavier than hydrogen were created soon after the Big Bang, to estimate the curvature of the universe.
"In different geometries, matter and light evolve differently, which allows us to extract the three-dimensional shape of the universe from observation data," Chudaykin told Live Science.
The research, published in the journal Physical Review D, found that to within a 0.2% margin of accuracy, the universe was flat."The data we gathered indicate that the spatial curvature is consistent with zero," the researchers wrote in the study. "It implies that our universe within statistical uncertainty is infinite."
yes and?
My goodness, you really love to argue against yourself. Above, the first thing you mentioned that it's limited by our perception which I certainly agree with.In order remove errors introduced by our perception of things we have to drill down the mathematics and all the equations point to the fact that the whole universe is indeed flat.
What is the shape of the universe?
News
By Elizabeth Rayne
published November 13, 2022
The universe may be vast, but researchers have multiple points of evidence that reveal its shape.
The universe may be vast, but researchers have multiple points of evidence that reveal its shape. (Image credit: Weiquan Lin via Getty Images)
The universe may seem shapeless because it is so vast, but it does have a form that astronomers can observe. So, what is it shaped like?
Physicists think the universe is flat. Several lines of evidence point to this flat universe: light left over from the Big Bang, the rate of expansion of the universe at different locations, and the way the universe "looks" from different angles, experts told Live Science.
David Spergel, a theoretical astrophysicist and emeritus professor of astrophysical sciences at Princeton University, has probed the shape of the universe for decades. In a 2003 study published in The Astrophysical Journal, Spergel measured irregularities in the cosmic microwave background (CMB), light left over from the Big Bang, that were observed by NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) and later by the European Space Agency's Planck spacecraft.
The amounts of positive and negative energy in a flat universe are exactly the same, and therefore cancel each other out. If the universe had a curvature, one would be higher than the other. "A flat universe corresponds to a universe with zero energy," Spergel told Live Science.
Related: How many atoms are in the observable universe?
In this case, the WMAP measurements of CMB fluctuations suggested the universe was both infinite and flat. Spergel also compared these measurements with those made by the European Space Agency's Planck spacecraft, which further constrained the possible shapes the universe could take.
"We can measure the curvature with some uncertainty, so we can say that the curvature is zero with some uncertainty," Spergel said. "While we can lower the uncertainty, we only at best constrain the geometry."
Evidence for the flatness of the universe also shows up in what's known as the critical density. At the critical density, a hypothetical universe would be flat and would eventually stop expanding, but only after an infinite time, according to the Swinburne University of Technology in Australia. If a hypothetical universe were denser than this, it would be curved like a sphere and eventually collapse in on itself due to its gravity — a proposed phenomenon known as the "Big Crunch."
RELATED MYSTERIES
—What's the coldest place in the universe?
—What is the smallest particle in the universe? (What about the largest?)
—How do we know the age of the universe?
But all measurements of our real universe suggest it is just below the critical density, meaning the universe is both flat and will expand indefinitely.
Yet another line of evidence suggests the universe is flat: It is isotropic, meaning it looks the same from every angle. Anton Chudaykin, a physicist at the Institute for Nuclear Research in Russia, and colleagues looked at the data on oscillations in regular, or "baryonic," matter, as well as models of how atomic nuclei heavier than hydrogen were created soon after the Big Bang, to estimate the curvature of the universe.
"In different geometries, matter and light evolve differently, which allows us to extract the three-dimensional shape of the universe from observation data," Chudaykin told Live Science.
The research, published in the journal Physical Review D, found that to within a 0.2% margin of accuracy, the universe was flat."The data we gathered indicate that the spatial curvature is consistent with zero," the researchers wrote in the study. "It implies that our universe within statistical uncertainty is infinite."
Then you argue for that selfsame perception to determine the flatness of the universe which by all means and methods is a limited perspective. If human perception is the limiting factor, flatness or sphericity cannot be determined!!
And you still haven't answered my original query on your original statement and backtracked on it. It was that gravitation affects human perception towards sphericity. This entire post is contradictory to that original statement of yours. Now you're arguing that despite gravity, human perception readily accepts flatness.
Or do you readily gravitate towards easy answers?
yes and?
My goodness, you really love to argue against yourself. Above, the first thing you mentioned that it's limited by our perception which I certainly agree with.
Then you argue for that selfsame perception to determine the flatness of the universe which by all means and methods is a limited perspective. If human perception is the limiting factor, flatness or sphericity cannot be determined!!
And you still haven't answered my original query on your original statement and backtracked on it. It was that gravitation affects human perception towards sphericity. This entire post is contradictory to that original statement of yours. Now you're arguing that despite gravity, human perception readily accepts flatness.
Or do you readily gravitate towards easy answers?
The warping of space time creates what we see when we look at the heavens ie the earth orbiting round the sun, the moon orbiting the earth and entire galaxies orbiting around super massive black holes.
This leads us to perceive the standard model of the universe in 3 dimensions.
However when we do the maths we find that the truth is stranger than fiction and that the balance of probabilities points to the fact that the whole universe is flat which of course infers that the contents have to be flat too.
This in no way suggests that future discoveries will not throw up yet another interpretation of how the universe is shaped.
There are no rights or wrongs when it comes to science. All we have at any given point in time is a hypothesis regarding how the physical world works. When observations reinforce the hypothesis the science is said to be withstanding the test of time but there will invariably come a point where measurements contradict conventional wisdom and a new theory has to be put forth to explain what is going on..
Take the speed of light in a vacuum. All observations so far have reinforced Einstein's equations. However nobody can discount the possibility that there may be a particle that breaks this speed limit just waiting to be discovered.
Keep an open mind and acknowledge the fact that the flat earthers may be proven right one day and the rest of us will look really stupid.
My mind is always open for vax and anti vax, flat earth or otherwise.
My mind cannot accept this kind of diagram. Show the edge first then talk further. When asked for the edge, the reply was - you vaxtard are assuming there is a edge
If you have an IQ, go and find the person who preaches that there is an edge with flat earth
But I doubt you have one. That is why mad dog always go bark the wrong tree
But I doubt you have one. That is why mad dog always go bark the wrong tree
You are just a retarded.
The one who told you that there is an edge, you don’t ask.
Come at people who never claim that there is an edge.
You are not just a retarded but also a siao lang
The one who told you that there is an edge, you don’t ask.
Come at people who never claim that there is an edge.
You are not just a retarded but also a siao lang
Only siao lang cult members would keep boosting their body with foreign substances and still think that they are a normal person lol
Stupid arse hole.
So your cult group preaches to you the earth is flat and it is infinity and you believe.
Listen. Only cult would tell their followers to take foreign substances into their body and die suddenly lol
I doubt you have an IQ to begin with lol
I doubt you have an IQ to begin with lol
If I find you I will hammer till you left with no teeth bloody son of the cult.
https://www.nsf.gov/geo/opp/antarct/anttrty.jsp
Globetards that barks will never understand what this treaty was about
Globetards that barks will never understand what this treaty was about
Such maths used to prove flatness of the Universe in our 3 dimensional Universe may merely be a hypothesis, remember - it is admittedly based upon probabilities. Furthermore, it is still an assumption & another belief in the POSSIBILITY of the UNKNOWN yet that would lead to a paradigm shift.
No doubt we Humankind had advanced from the stone age, I would readily agree that we STILL have much to know & learn, as for sure, we are not masters of the Universe....
Let's do a test on "perceptions'.
A)If the Universe or our planet is Flat, then everything would be in 2 dimensional. So what about a HDB block of flat? Does it look 2 dimensional, of only length & breadth, let alone even the Human figure?
Flat earthers would argue that their beliefs is not about structures & beings, but only the planet is flat. Thus, their own beliefs which claims to be of science, is debunked by their own words - it's either a 2 dimensional World where EVERYTHING is 2 dimensional, & nothing is in 3d.
Then there is the arguments about different dimensions type of Worlds. Such exists only in Quantum physics in theoretical forms, but none had successfully created or seen such dimensions. To argue that such exists is based upon beliefs, & not science.
B)When Humankind looks up at the skies, they can see the sun, moon, stars, etc. They are certainly not 2 dimensional but flat earthers will claimed that Humanity had never gone to the moon & the space program was a hoax. Such presumptions can be acceptable, as most had not gone to the stars...
However, take for instance - meteorites. These are parts of other world objects that fell to Earth, proven with evidences & science based upon their atomic & molecular structures, which are not from Earth.
Such objects have length, breath & height, mass & volume. Such objects alone PROVES that the universe is NOT flat, & any mathematical models used, more so based upon probabilities, had been done in error & are merely hypothesis, NOT FACTS.
So....we are to believe you & Tik Tok instead???
Git outta here...hahaha!!!
You are a riot. I never laughed so hard in a year as much as I had laughed by your posts. Perhaps Singapore had finally found a talent in you - for comedy.....Similar threads
