And precisely you still want to talk about VIFAP...To qualify for the VIFAP, the person must be assessed by a doctor to be related to the individual’s COVID-19 vaccination.
So if doctor's diagnosis says it is not related to the vaccine, means that it is not related so how can this person continue to claim that it is related since there is no evidence? If there are really evidence, just show the evidence 不是得了吗?So that's the cruz of the problem, you cannot show proof and yet claim it's related, this obviously mere anecdotal evidence. You dare to stake your life to belief in such 'evidence' meh?
And if this Kumgong IK really willing to pay for such 'Vaxxed injuries" like she claims in her FB, I are curious what are the set criteria she will use? She reference from where? From some quack controversial doctors? or from her own judgement? LOL. This is the reason why this lady is a danger to the society and deserved to be charged and hopefully jailed very soon, to serve as a deterrent to other siao langs out to wreck havoc on the society based on their own opinion and theories which of course they will claim as 'facts'.
Key thing is, always remember and memorize this:
Once MOH says there is no link to vaccine, means no link. Don't argue.
https://www.moh.gov.sg/covid-19/vaccination/vifap
" To qualify for the VIFAP, individuals must be a Singapore Citizen, Permanent Resident or long-term pass holder who has received the COVID-19 vaccination under the NVP, and experienced a serious side effect that required inpatient hospitalisation, or caused permanent severe disability, or was fatal. The serious side effect must be assessed by a doctor to be related to the individual’s COVID-19 vaccination. COVID-19 vaccinations received under the Private Vaccination Programme are not eligible for the VIFAP."