• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Iris Koh wants to sue Calvin Cheng

Hightech88

Alfrescian
Loyal

eating-popcorn-gif-8.gif
 

Balls2U

Alfrescian
Loyal

This Raymond (Iris' husband) is also another clown and idiot. The rules provides that the originating claim must be served on the defendant personally for the service to be valid and effective. But the rules doesn't entitle him to enter a private property to serve the documents on the defendant. Even if the police are called, they also can't do anything the condo management has every right to deny him entry into the premises.
 

tobelightlight

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSY3QeAeA/


Important Announcement
28 July.

We are going to file the defamation lawsuit against Calvin Cheng tomorrow at State Courts at Havelock Road.

If you are one of the "bunch of clowns" who feel enraged by his comments and want to join us to be one of the litigants, please reach out to me asap. You can pm me on WhatsApp, telegram or tiktok.

I'm meeting "bunch of clowns" tomorrow at State Court Cafe 2pm. Filing is at 3pm.

Join us if you can.
 
Last edited:

NanoSpeed

Alfrescian
Loyal
Screenshot_1.jpg


If she uses the phrase "bunch of clowns" freely like she does now, then she will not be able to prove that the phrase "bunch of clowns" is defamatory. Calvin made that alleged defamatory remark once, but Iris is republishing the alleged defamatory remark freely.

Even if she can prove that "bunch of clowns" is defamatory, she will have to bear a good percentage of "contributory negligence" because she is republishing the alleged defamatory remark.
 

tobelightlight

Alfrescian
Loyal
View attachment 203222

If she uses the phrase "bunch of clowns" freely like she does now, then she will not be able to prove that the phrase "bunch of clowns" is defamatory. Calvin made that alleged defamatory remark once, but Iris is republishing the alleged defamatory remark freely.

Even if she can prove that "bunch of clowns" is defamatory, she will have to bear a good percentage of "contributory negligence" because she is republishing the alleged defamatory remark.
Can u message her that? Are u a practising lawyer in any way?
 
Last edited:

NanoSpeed

Alfrescian
Loyal
The agenda of Iris is pretty obvious by now. They are going after remarks that impute they are causing death to others by their anti-vaxxed agenda.

By that, Calvin will have to prove the truth of his assertions and show evidence of the number of people who were dead due to being unvaxxed, and the more difficult part, the connection that the dead chose not to be vaxxed because they were influenced by Iris after vaccine had become freely available.

This will give Iris the official platform to further her anti-vaxxed agenda by showing the unvaxxed who survived and to dispel the myth that you will die if you are not vaxxed.

Calvin has a more difficult task in terms of standard of proof - his remarks appear absolute and leave very little leeway for him to wriggle his way out.

It would appear that the remark "a bunch of clowns" is just an appetizer to lure Calvin into complacency.
 
Top