• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

If a member here is discredited, should all his "friends" be made accountable too?

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
64,031
Points
113
If you click on a member profile, you'll see a list of "friends" who have electronically pledged their support for him/her.

If the member is disgraced and driven out of town, should his forum friends have to face the music too?

Making them accountable would force people to be more careful about accepting "friend" requests.
 
Re: If a member here is discredited, should all his "friends" be made accountable too

nope...they could have been friends for a host of reasons.....each guy should be accountable for his own crimes and wrongdoings unless it is evident

that his friends were in cahoots with him.

If you click on a member profile, you'll see a list of "friends" who have electronically pledged their support for him/her.

If the member is disgraced and driven out of town, should his forum friends have to face the music too?

Making them accountable would force people to be more careful about accepting "friend" requests.
 
Re: If a member here is discredited, should all his "friends" be made accountable too

each guy should be accountable for his own crimes and wrongdoings unless it is evident

Are they not all liable for the charge of "guilt by association"?

After all, many of Hitler's associates were found guilty at Nuremberg and had to face the music.
 
Re: If a member here is discredited, should all his "friends" be made accountable too

it all depends on the reason for their association....they could have had other common interests which had nothing to do with the guy's mischief.

Sometimes as in your example, ' guilt by association applies ' but not always.

Are they not all liable for the charge of "guilt by association"?

After all, many of Hitler's associates were found guilty at Nuremberg and had to face the music.
 
Re: If a member here is discredited, should all his "friends" be made accountable too

Are they not all liable for the charge of "guilt by association"?

After all, many of Hitler's associates were found guilty at Nuremberg and had to face the music.

Hitler's associates had to face the music only because they lost the war. Should they win, the Americans may have to answer to war crimes and crimes against humanity e.g. dropping two atomic bombs on civilians when it was unnecessary, or the British for giving and letting the jews accupy and displacing Palestinians from their homeland. Victors write the history.

Are you trying to raise the profile of this forum to world stage status ?? Ha Ha
 
Re: If a member here is discredited, should all his "friends" be made accountable too

When a member is discredited then all his clones should be killed off. I am sure this method will make all the puppet masters behave themselves....over at the sex forum clones are tolerated but when used for mayhem they are taken out of commission in an instant.....
 
Re: If a member here is discredited, should all his "friends" be made accountable too

I think so far this forum works quite well. Why change rules here and there?

I don't think we should involve " friends " of any forummer who is banned or ostracised for whatever reason.

We should be more aware of The Army, The Mob and The Clan. The Godfather and his Henchmen.

Friends are harmless. They are simply FRIENDS. Why involve them? Kumsiah...

I take responsibility for my own actions. I am accountable for own misdeeds. I get tekan and I get hanged. Fair and square.:)
 
Re: If a member here is discredited, should all his "friends" be made accountable too

Are they not all liable for the charge of "guilt by association"?

After all, many of Hitler's associates were found guilty at Nuremberg and had to face the music.

Excellent idea, though be known that this was practiced by chinks very early on. What a shocker, they were ahead of you thousands of years ago

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nine_familial_exterminations
 
Re: If a member here is discredited, should all his "friends" be made accountable too

A big step backwards to barbarism:(
 
Re: If a member here is discredited, should all his "friends" be made accountable too

Juz remember this.

Friends can be enemies

Enemies can be friends

So dont trust friends too much...
 
Re: If a member here is discredited, should all his "friends" be made accountable too

Juz remember this.

Friends can be enemies

Enemies can be friends

So dont trust friends too much...

This I agree. I would prefer to trust my friends than trust my enemies. But it's all up to your own PERCEPTION. The sad thing is this: many people, including very knowledgeable and very intellectual people, have the WRONG PERCEPTION...and hence they regard their friends as enemies.They become rather paranoid. They are intellectual giants who turned cretins.:(
 
Re: If a member here is discredited, should all his "friends" be made accountable too

Juz remember this.

Friends can be enemies

Enemies can be friends

So dont trust friends too much...

Good point bro. Look at Raiders and AK as good examples.
 
Re: If a member here is discredited, should all his "friends" be made accountable too

Keep your worst enemy closest to you.


Juz remember this.

Friends can be enemies

Enemies can be friends

So dont trust friends too much...
 
Re: If a member here is discredited, should all his "friends" be made accountable too

Good point bro. Look at Raiders and AK as good examples.

I believe we are all good friends and pals here. Once the dust has settled, we are best of friends. No problems....:)

Don't sweat the small stuff and don't fan the fire and be a provocateur ....things will cool down with time...no sweat :)
 
Re: If a member here is discredited, should all his "friends" be made accountable too

Usually thats the spouse

wauhahahaaa!!!!!!!!:):)....Sundary was Hot. Monday was worse. Today Tuesday laugh till fall down..wauhahahaa!!!:)
 
Re: If a member here is discredited, should all his "friends" be made accountable too

a person should pay for his own sin.
 
Re: If a member here is discredited, should all his "friends" be made accountable too

wauhahahaaa!!!!!!!!:):)....Sundary was Hot. Monday was worse. Today Tuesday laugh till fall down..wauhahahaa!!!:)


Sundary? Nundary i know, it means thank you but Sundary is a new word to me . I go look it up in my mamar dictionary. Vait ah .
 
Re: If a member here is discredited, should all his "friends" be made accountable too

Sundary? Nundary i know, it means thank you but Sundary is a new word to me . I go look it up in my mamar dictionary. Vait ah .

Tuesdary is great!!! Sundary was horrid. Mondary was nightmare.....hope todary is jokery!!:)
 
Re: If a member here is discredited, should all his "friends" be made accountable too

Are they not all liable for the charge of "guilt by association"?

After all, many of Hitler's associates were found guilty at Nuremberg and had to face the music.

Excuse me hitler's associates aka friends were also in charge of the nazi party and also implemented or followed his orders to implement attacks, kicking out of non aryans and so on so of course they were as guilty as hitler. Using that sort of comparison to the one here in the forum whereby someone a guilty forummer's fren list is automatically guilty simply for being his fren sounds really ridiculous to say the least.
 
Back
Top