Horrific S. Korean Jeju plane crash - accident or intended?

[Truthspeak]

Nonsense you twit. If you had always claimed that the earth is flat, so is the sea, right? The skills of the pilot will play a large part in navigating and gliding the plane onto a water surface. It's very much controllable because, especially in this case, the plane was not suffering from engine failure nor engine shutdown. Definitely, the basic laws of physics will tell you that the chances of survival is higher if it were glide onto a liquid surface compared to a solid ground.

They wouldn’t call it a landing on the sea a miracle for no reason. I suggest you setup your own airline company and tell your pilots to do an emergency landing on the sea and see their expressions lol

By then, you will know who is the nonsense one.
Lol

 

[winners]

They wouldn’t call it a landing on the sea a miracle for no reason. I suggest you setup your own airline company and tell your pilots to do an emergency landing on the sea and see their expressions lol

By then, you will know who is the nonsense one. Lol

You still don't understand, twit. When you have to choose a belly landing between a solid ground and a sea surface, definitely the latter will be a better choice, and especially so, since the sea is just next to the airport, not thousands of miles away.

Do you know why most airports, if possible, are built next to the sea or a nearby water area? Think about this for yourself.

 

[syed putra]

It is unconceivable that a mere undercarriage wheel would go UNDETECTED on a modern aircraft if it malfunctions

The hydraulics was inoperative after the bird strike as it's powered by the engines and somehow, the pilots fail to engage the wheels manually from the cockpit. If they had read through the checklist, it should have been performed. But for some weird reason, they were in a rush to land. I would think both are not very proficient in English.

 

[Truthspeak]

You still don't understand, twit. When you have to choose a belly landing between a solid ground and a sea surface, definitely the latter will be a better choice, and especially so, since the sea is just next to the airport, not thousands of miles away.

Do you know why most airports, if possible, are built next to the sea? Think about this for yourself.

Setup your own airline company and train your pilots to do that. Lol

 

[syed putra]

You still don't understand, twit. When you have to choose a belly landing between a solid ground and a sea surface, definitely the latter will be a better choice, and especially so, since the sea is just next to the airport, not thousands of miles away.

Do you know why most airports, if possible, are built next to the sea? Think about this for yourself.

If they had informed the airport and gave them time that s belly landing is coming, the airport may use foam on the runway to reduce the chance of a fire. But in this case the plane crashed into a solid concrete wall at the end of the runway. That wall is not suppose to be there for cases such as this.

 

[winners]

Setup your own airline company and train your pilots to do that. Lol

Is that all you can say? How childish you had behaved?

 

[Truthspeak]

Is that all you can say? How childish you had behaved?

Why not you go ask a pilot your questions than behaving like a crybaby?

 

[winners]

If they had informed the airport and gave them time that s belly landing is coming, the airport may use foam on the runway to reduce the chance of a fire. But in this case the plane crashed into a solid concrete wall at the end of the runway. That wall is not suppose to be there for cases such as this.

We don't know exactly what is the purpose, location and facing of the wall. So, it is not right to come to your conclusion. Some semblance of a retention at airport peripheries I know is for the purpose of acting as a sound barrier. A typical example is at the Paya Lebar Airport where you can see barriers around its peripherals along Old Tampines Road. Because the sonic boom from a large A380 during take off can be quite a disaster if left unhindered.

 

[winners]

Why not you go ask a pilot your questions than behaving like a crybaby?

Why should I even talk to a twit who in this 21st century, is still insisting that the earth is flat, there is no such thing as a nuclear weapon, etc. Really wasting my time with you.

 

[syed putra]

We don't know exactly what is the purpose, location and facing of the wall. So, it is not right to come to your conclusion. Some semblance of a retention at airport peripheries I know is for the purpose of acting as a sound barrier.

There are two walls. The smaller ones to mark the airport periphery.
The robust concrete one it seems to fix the airport runway approach lights. Normally these lights are fixed on steel poles.

 

[Truthspeak]

Why should I even talk to a twit who in this 21st century, is still insisting that the earth is flat, there is no such thing as a nuclear weapon, etc. Really wasting my time with you.

If there is, go and prove in front of our eyes. I am open for your scientific discovery lol

Not delusions lol

Please don’t cry that you cannot prove and have to believe your delusions lol

 

[winners]

If there is, go and prove in front of our eyes. I am open for your scientific discovery lol

Not delusions lol

Please don’t cry that you cannot prove and have to believe your delusions lol

Please don't talk nonsense in this day and age. It just clearly demonstrates your incapability towards the comprehension of Science.

 

[Truthspeak]

Please don't talk nonsense in this day and age. It just clearly demonstrates your incapability towards the comprehension of Science.

If you can demonstrate scientifically, you wouldn’t be crying baby here lol

Remember the burden of proof is on the person who makes the claim. Not the person who said it is impossible

 

[winners]

If you can demonstrate scientifically, you wouldn’t be crying baby here lol

It seems to me that your vocabulary is critically limited to "delusions" and "crying baby". What a nerd you are? Even an AI chatbot is many times better than you. Please ask your programmer to do an update for you.

 

[Truthspeak]

It seems to me that your vocabulary is critically limited to "delusions" and "crying baby". What a nerd you are? Even an AI chatbot is many times better than you. Please ask your programmer to do an update for you.

There you go with your derailment instead of substantiating of your own claim lol

 

[Truthspeak]

Why should I even talk to a twit who in this 21st century, is still insisting that the earth is flat, there is no such thing as a nuclear weapon, etc. Really wasting my time with you.

Yes, it is 21st century and I am waiting for you to prove in front of our eyes. Please don’t show me you can’t science and only want to assume your delusions are reality lol


Let’s see who really can’t science.

 

[Willamshakespear]

In my opinion, the pilot had made a bad decision. I'm sure he should be aware of the faulty landing gear as there should have a warning message if it has malfunctioned or not fully extracted. Furthermore, he had also sent a Mayday message to the control tower to acknowledge that he has a problem prior to landing the plane.

In such a situation, the pilot should have aborted the landing and possibly ask the airport ground crews for additional reinforcement before making another landing attempt. Usually, for belly landing, the runway will be immediately coated with foam to lessen the damage to the aircraft. Once the aircraft has touched ground, the engines will be switched to maximum back thrust to slow it down.

Furthermore, the airport is just next to the sea and the pilot could have instead diverted to glide and land on the sea, after all, it is only a small 737 plane. This may also avert such a high casualty rate. This was what happened to the US Airways Flight 1549 which landed on the Hudson River in 2009.

Good analysis. Thanks.

Just to add, the Air Traffic Controller at the tower is supposed to give Visual Aid to see that the undercarriage wheels are functioning. If not they will warn the pilot not to land till the issue is resolved, or in the case of an emergency, to make one more round before safety aid can be laid on the runway in time.

Perhaps, due to worries over the engine malfunctioning by a supposed bird strike, the pilot decided to make a belly landing as the undercarriage wheel systems were not functioning, as the plane with a malfunctioning engine may not be able to fly another round over the airport....

So, why did the undercarriage system failed to work? While flying, it retracts & is covered by flaps, thus no bird would had jammed such systems.

Furthermore, was there even an engine failure that the pilot had to risk a dangerous belly landing, more so with a wall in existence right at the end of the runway?

 

[winners]

Yes, it is 21st century and I am waiting for you to prove in front of our eyes. Please don’t show me you can’t science and only want to assume your delusions are reality lol


Let’s see who really can’t science.

Hey twit, your English comprehension seems to be getting from bad to worse. What is the meaning of "can't science"? You truly needs a new update. Some parts of your memory are getting corrupted from the ram decay syndrome.

 

[Truthspeak]

Hey twit, your English comprehension seems to be getting from bad to worse. What is the meaning of "can't science"? You truly needs a new update. Some parts of your memory are getting corrupted from the ram decay syndrome.

There you go with your derailment again. Apart from sharing your delusions, you have “nothing” to demonstrate in science lol

Believe in something that doesn’t exists is a serious mental disease. You better see a psychiatrist soon.

 

[winners]

There you go with your derailment again. Apart from sharing your delusions, you have nothing to demonstrate in science lol

Still did not reply to me what is the meaning of "can't science"? You lose.