• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Gurkhas damn kilat is a MYTH!

bro looney...read again...see how he took the guy down..

First he spat ....that means he gave the gurkha his very chow phui nua

Next they exchanged blowjobs ......of course the gurkha lose la...they not used to this kind of assault.

Gurkhas damn kilat is a MYTH!

Once a Gurkha pushed past me near City Square, I scolded him and he turned around and pushed me

I spat and him and we exchanged blows, I easily took the fucker down despite being much older, unlike once when I was whacked by one ah beng until damn chiak lat

did you take the fucker down with your Muay Thai or Jew Jitzoo?
 
I agreed. I think being born in a martial race as the Gurkhas means, from young they are trained in fighting skills especially in using their Kukri, a short extremely sharp dagger. They were living in the high attitude and dangers taught them martial skills, especially in fighting off intruders and wild animals. While non-martial people teach their young reading, music or dancing, the martial race taught only fighting stuffs. This explain the meaning of a martial race.

I do not believe the Koreans are a match with the Gurkhas. The Koreans like the chinese are not a martial race. During the Korean war in 1950, the UN sent troops to assist the US and these include Gurkhas troops in the British army. They fought well against the Koreans. Both Koreans need the help of the US and Chinese respectively and there were not many espisode of Korean fighting abilities in wars( except their popular movies). Even the ferocious Japanese Imperial army then are afrad of these little Gurkhas.

Yes, it is true the Gurkhas loves to drink and they loves woman. I heard from my grandpa that like their bethrens, the Tibetans, they loves to drink so much that my grandpa used to present them with free beers in the 1960s when he lives near Bartley. Like any men they also like to visit prostitutes during their off days. So these has been part of their lifestyle in the past till now.

However, i agreed that the change of govt in Nepal will affect the future recruitment of the Gurkhas by overseas militaries. The Maoist govt may halt the deployment and recall these Gurkhas back into the Nepali army then sending these elite men into other militaries. If this happen, it will severely affect many countries depending on the Gurkhas for their security purposes.
 
ROC vs Burma Gurkhas ( 1954 Shan States ) - ROC victory.
PRC vs India ( 1962 Border Conflict ) - PRC victory.

Gurkhas, Ah Neh troops all lousy and useless. Chinese troops best!!
 
Besotted is telling the truth but he forgot to disclose the age of his opponent.

20060627UVetsDayWA.JPG


This is an interesting article I found about Gurkhas


Wow, British are outsourcing well after Afghanistan. That strategy may work for once or several but the G force will definitely know it better soon.
 
No, the Gurkhas came from the highland in Nepal. They are not from Myanmar.

In the 1962 war, the Indian troops are mostly Sikh troops with just a few of the Gurkhas.
 
No, the Gurkhas came from the highland in Nepal. They are not from Myanmar.
In the 1962 war, the Indian troops are mostly Sikh troops with just a few of the Gurkhas.

after Burma's independence in 1948, the Gurkhas from the British army joined the new Burma army.

in 1954, the Burma govt sent the Gurkhas division to annihilate the ROC troops "taking refuge" in Shan States. the numerically superior Burma Gurkhas troops with superior military weapons and equipments were soundly defeated by the ROC 709 division.
 
LOL I had a good laugh on this :D


bro looney...read again...see how he took the guy down..

First he spat ....that means he gave the gurkha his very chow phui nua

Next they exchanged blowjobs ......of course the gurkha lose la...they not used to this kind of assault.
 
I have been giving besotted "friendly warnings" not to let his prc worker stand over him and shout "We ah tiongs are not to be bullied!"

And now here he is trying to take on the gurkhas!!!! :eek:
 
bro looney...read again...see how he took the guy down..

First he spat ....that means he gave the gurkha his very chow phui nua

Next they exchanged blowjobs ......of course the gurkha lose la...they not used to this kind of assault.

This is the kilat reply from the most kilat member.:D
 
Good observations but not necessarily the right conclusions.

As good as the Gurkhas are as warriors, their effectiveness depends, to a great extent, on the leadership they had. This is what made the British Gurkha such a formidable force - the British provided leadership and organization and deployed the Gurkhas where they could excel. As someone else has pointed out, there are no Gurkha units in the RN or performing marines functions.

In the examples you cited, the forces that deployed them probably did not provide the supported needed for the operations the Gurkhas were engaged in. In a similar way, I felt it was wrong to finger the Gurkhas for MSK's escape. They were unsuitable (and probably not well trained) for escort duties that required close supervision of detained persons. In Changi Prison, for instance, the Gurkhas are deployed at the watchtowers and have no contact with prisoners. The Whitley escape was clearly a lapse of leadership and management but the Gurkhas were a convenient scapegoat, and netizens helped the PAPzis point the finger.


ROC vs Burma Gurkhas ( 1954 Shan States ) - ROC victory.
PRC vs India ( 1962 Border Conflict ) - PRC victory.

Gurkhas, Ah Neh troops all lousy and useless. Chinese troops best!!
 
aren't they just high paid mercenaries, in the sense that they pledge allegiance to whoever pays them????
 
Gurkha blade in the kitchen

[video=youtube;0DHGlhFJH0g]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DHGlhFJH0g[/video]
 
Early this morning I was walking past near Aljunied market when this Gurkha brushed past me. I immediately turned around and confronted him. He looked confused and scared. Luckily his parents carrying market bags rushed over and calm me down. They apologised and told me that they allowed to him to alight from the stroller and walk around.

You could clearly see that the Gurkha legend is a myth.
 
haha yeah ..and when all this was happening i saw forummer Besotted stealing the guy's baby food.

Early this morning I was walking past near Aljunied market when this Gurkha brushed past me. I immediately turned around and confronted him. He looked confused and scared. Luckily his parents carrying market bags rushed over and calm me down. They apologised and told me that they allowed to him to alight from the stroller and walk around.

You could clearly see that the Gurkha legend is a myth.
 
They apologised and told me that they allowed to him to alight from the stroller and walk around.

The kid is usually in a stroller, but the moment they board the mrt, the standing parent will suddenly hold the kid and start to sway to and fro unsteadily. Of course, the empty stroller is still there taking up valuable space. :D
 
after Burma's independence in 1948, the Gurkhas from the British army joined the new Burma army.

in 1954, the Burma govt sent the Gurkhas division to annihilate the ROC troops "taking refuge" in Shan States. the numerically superior Burma Gurkhas troops with superior military weapons and equipments were soundly defeated by the ROC 709 division.

The Indian army, not the Burmese army took over the Gurkhas. The Gurkhas did however fought PLA troops in the Sino Indian border wars.

As for Nepal banning Gurkhas, that won't happen. Hell will break lose because it is the livelihood of many generations of Nepalese. Nepalese will riot in the streets if the govt tries to be too smart.
 
aren't they just high paid mercenaries, in the sense that they pledge allegiance to whoever pays them????

Yes,they are mercaneries in that sense. However the british was surprised that the Gurkhas as mercaneries show such extreme loyalty,bravery n arent afraid to die. During ww2,they were the only soldiers who didnt want to surrender or recruited into the National Indian army by the Japanese.

Mercaneries would just fight for money but the Gurkhas were quite different. The other indian soldiers quickly surrender by not the Gurkhas who fought on. This make them special that many including spore recruit them to be personal bodyguards for their VIPs.
 
Back
Top