who are they?
I had expressed my feelings about MBT and the Scottish sausage eater before.
I had expressed my feelings about MBT and the Scottish sausage eater before.
Sorry i missed out on that point. Did Ravi allege that i used him?
I am a poor lawyer fighting a battle which is more often than not on a lonely front. I can only render the help i can. Sometimes such cases which are fully pro bono do clash with paid work.
Like i said before even 300/ hour is whittled down to almost nothing by our high costs and overheads. I am only one individual i do what i can.
There are 3000 other lawyers, if you know any of them, try to get them to take on political cases too.
<table class="contentpaneopen"><tbody><tr><td class="contentheading" width="100%">George Yeo doesn't answer whether he deserves salary </td> <td class="buttonheading" align="right" width="100%"> </td> <td class="buttonheading" align="right" width="100%"> </td> </tr> </tbody></table> <table class="contentpaneopen"> <tbody><tr> <td class="createdate" valign="top"> Wednesday, 12 August 2009 </td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top"> <style type="text/css"> <!-- @page { margin: 0.79in } P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } --> </style>
Singapore Democrats
In the previous exchange, Dr Chee Soon Juan asked Foreign Minister George Yeo what his salary was and whether he felt he deserved it. Mr Yeo did not want to answer the question but said that he had to borrow money to break his bond when he joined the PAP. The minister was an SAF scholar.
Dear Dr Chee
It is not for me to judge myself. When I entered politics, I had to borrow money to break bond. At Harvard Business School, I was recruited by investment banks and GIC but could not accept because I was under bond to the SAF. Salary scale of ministers' salaries are published.
If you don't mind, I rather not be moving on to other points at your pleasure.
George
Dear George,</td></tr></tbody></table>
I am sorry you chose not to answer my question. As I said, I was not trying to set you up or embarrass you. My question was a genuine attempt to try to understand why our ministers pay themselves so excessively.
It is a very vexing issue for Singaporeans. People are not unreasonable, if there is a good and sincere explanation, they will understand and accept it. But ministers don't want to explain anything, you just want to ram it down our throats.
As for your salary, a quick search will reveal your American counterpart's pay. Hillary Clinton's salary is US$186,600 per year. But I can't find yours even after an extended search. Why the reluctance to tell Singaporeans how much their Foreign Minister is paid?
I guess we'll just have to let readers form their own opinions about why you choose not to answer these questions.
On the other points: I did not mean to be presumptuous in deciding when to discuss them. I just thought that for clarity's sake, we could dwell on one point at a time. My apologies.
I was intrigued that whilst you were at MTI that you had considered introducing minimum wage but decided against it because, in your words, "Beyond a certain point, it will drive investors away."
It is true that if workers are paid too much, that is, beyond what they are worth, the market will react and businesses will find it impossible to cope.
But just as workers can be paid too much, they can also be paid too little. Minimum Wage set at a reasonable level, after seeking the views of workers and employers, will ensure that the see-saw is balanced. The current situation protects the foreign investor while exploiting the local worker. This is not right.
And the solution to investors leaving is not to suppress wages but to allow an entrepreneurial class to build up in Singapore which the Government has failed to do. Local businesses can be enticed to stay on in Singapore through various tax regimes. This way we don't have to depend on foreign investors that much.
By the way, did Lee Hsien Loong and Philip Yeo say anything about you breaking your bond? And being a bond-breaker yourself, did you defend the other bond-breakers who were criticised in Parliament?
Your resoponse again greatly appreciated.
Soon Juan
Then something has changed since the AMP episode and when Goh who was then PM had to go down and appease them. Some issue about alternative Malay leadership.
There are other ways to do it but that's another story for another time.
Goh Meng Seng
Dear Scroobal
Interestingly enough, Dr Chee just cannot let go of personal issues whenever he engages with the PAP. In his exchanges with G Yeo currently ,He is aasking dear old georgie why he thinks he was justified in breaking the bond :_)). And yes hounding the man for his exact salary when what is publically available is the max possible salary inclusive of all bonuses.
Locke
u see hor...only moron like u need to smell a pussy to know whether it is smelly or not.
for smart people.....one look at her fuck face, i know her pussy damn bladdy smelly.
hahaha.
I know of one particular gathering in particular where everyone was mesmerised including one idiot who I thought had little between his ears and intelligence revolved around types of golf courses. Chee was there not for politics nor was he the guest but he was asked to comment about it and the whole session was his and they were clamouring for more. No one from his party or any other politicians from the opposition or ruling party was there. I was not there but heard about it shortly after.
How do you explain that? Bizarre.
Sorry i missed out on that point. Did Ravi allege that i used him?
Its seemed to have worked. You are now in the forum engaging people instead of directing fire behind some skirt.
Don't worry, we will hold your hands while you are here by yourself. Just as there are many ways to skin a cat, there are also many ways to draw out a weasel.
Hope you managed to get a cup of coffee and a bite on your way here.
I have no views .The very reason why I asked you to explain yourself.
I am a poor lawyer fighting a battle which is more often than not on a lonely front. I can only render the help i can. Sometimes such cases which are fully pro bono do clash with paid work.
Like i said before even 300/ hour is whittled down to almost nothing by our high costs and overheads. I am only one individual i do what i can.
There are 3000 other lawyers, if you know any of them, try to get them to take on political cases too.
just admit u are a hopless half past six lawyer that is easily seduced by a married troll - the beginning of all ur suffering.
how did MICHELLE lose her baby? are u now officially the husband of the troll? or did she commit bigamy with 2 husbands?
ya, right! poor lawyer owning 3 kong out bikes and a host of noisy speakers. just how much u make from your Yishun flat sale? the troll has accused HDB of profiteering from peasants. did u also profiteer from that sale? by how much?
before u guys set out to post inflamming threads hoping to stir the anger n disharmony among the society and causing disunity, strife and unhappiness - please ask yourself - CAN WE SEE THROUGH YOUR REAL MOTIVE?
if we can, then please SHUD THE FUCKUP!:oIo:
see what i mean?
the nerd, ngejay is MISSING IN ACTION here. in his place, he deploys all this nasty clones which post irrelevant spammings.
and these are the people we are suppose to believe?
the only way to SHUDTHEFUCKUP them would be best leave to the authority.
the day of reckoning is near! lay back, relax and have some popcorns!
in his place, he deploys all this nasty clones which post irrelevant spammings
yes well spotted...i would have thought the oppos could have reached out to AMP and try to cultivate at least 1 or 2 chaps from the same...
perhaps you should bear this in mind - never start what you are not or may not be prepared to see through and finish...
I think opposition and opposition politicians need to ask themselves what is the biggest missing factor among all factors of their cause, rather than try to fulfill a missing factor that is most in tandem with their personal agenda. Maybe they will be able to find their way through PAP-dominated politics a bit better.