The larger-than-Singapore groups they work with, elementary speaking.
The cause is in the books. The chap and his party's pals knows that part of the plan is to write books to tell people of the situation in Singapore. That's why the materials are as credible or even more than other opposition mantras because this chap is clearly intelligent. But whatever actions that put himself out, bankruptcy jails etc, even if they are seen as mistakes by us or most of the electorate, are to show up the bad of the PAP.
In essence that creates a perfect circular argument (in Locke's words) his supporters can use as standard answer - I am good because I get the worst, and because I got the worst, I have to be good, period. That takes away having to defend anything else on their party's policy etc.
Then something has changed since the AMP episode and when Goh who was then PM had to go down and appease them. Some issue about alternative Malay leadership.
Yes, yes... the perfect circular argument. Very well articulated.
In fact I have seen good intelligent people who have no affinity towards SDP using the same argument - one must be good because PAP screwed that person the worst. But unable to explain what was actually achieved.
Because of his enigmatic ways, some other decent people think that he is being paid.
I once came across a high grade US report on Singapore politics that was very good except for one glaring point - Low was not in it at all but Chee was described as the leader of the opposition. Chiam was also mentioned.
By the way, arising from this, a group of Chinese Professional, all OMS ( who consider themselves as representing Chinese heritage and interest got together and made it known that no PAP MP represents Chinese interest. It is led by an NTU chap, has released a series of publications but does not seem to have gained traction. I can't recall the name though. Very passionate and very angry.
heard some rumblings about this but did not know the malay acronym...tks for the info...i think the ethnicity of the spouse may also be an issue...heard some rumblings about tarmuggi's wife when he was min i/c of malay affairs...
i must say that there appears to be a perception to some extent at least which seems to suggest that the malay/muslims with indian or arab blood appear to be smarter and more ambitious than their pure malay/muslim blood brethern...
Yes, yes... the perfect circular argument. Very well articulated.
In fact I have seen good intelligent people who have no affinity towards SDP using the same argument - one must be good because PAP screwed that person the worst. But unable to explain what was actually achieved.
Because of his enigmatic ways, some other decent people think that he is being paid.
I once came across a high grade US report on Singapore politics that was very good except for one glaring point - Low was not in it at all but Chee was described as the leader of the opposition. Chiam was also mentioned.
yes well spotted...i would have thought the oppos could have reached out to AMP and try to cultivate at least 1 or 2 chaps from the same...
you see i still get the impression that perhaps quite afew malay/muslims view the pap malay/mps as 'uncle toms'...also i agree with scroobal and goh meng seng on the point that with the latest cabinet reshuffle and appt of new nmps the malay/muslim community may be slightly unhappy because there was little upward movement amongst their representatives...although the latest BG appointment may have helped to ameliorate things abit...
By the way, arising from this, a group of Chinese Professional, all OMS ( who consider themselves as representing Chinese heritage and interest got together and made it known that no PAP MP represents Chinese interest. It is led by an NTU chap, has released a series of publications but does not seem to have gained traction. I can't recall the name though. Very passionate and very angry.
Here is the rub - Ishak, the BG , a lovely chap is a DKK and married to a Chinese. Ishak interestingly is what one would call a true blue Singapore, completely oblivious to race. Not exactly a Malay leader.
Dear Scroobal
Food for thought, Even if you find a Malay enough Malay Candidate , what issues will resonate with a Malay voter without losing the Chinese Vote ? I mean granted saying the pledge in Malay would have helped, having a senior chinese opposition member speak in Malay would have helped even more........but assuming another GE soon what are the pressing Malay issues ?
Locke
What the fuck are you talking about????
exams are approaching kiddie
stop wasting time here and do your homework
leave the serious stuff to adults
This is how it is supposed to work - the Malay votes would be the tipping point for marginal seats. The Chinese voters in GRC would not take into account who that Malay is as that chap is part of the required quota. They would look primarily at the Chinese candidates vs the PAP chaps. The Malays would zoom straight at the Malay candidate, not happy immediately rejected.
I suspect the issues are secondary - that person must be acceptable to the community as an MP first. That would only take place if he is already an acceptable face within the community.
Do understand that I am not trying to evade your questions about what the Malay issues are. Its who that rep is that appears paramount. I also noticed that they prefer not to discuss their community issues with others. Try talking to a Malay Professional. The evasive action is pretty obvious.
I think we more or less know what the issues are just that we did not realise that they were only prepared to issue license to a select few to represent them with these issues.
Very hard to work the same way among Chinese. They are the major race here. The underlying phenomenon all around the world without fail, with small degrees of variation depending on the characteristic of the race, is that minorities tend to feel more insecure especially in cases of racism. The more acute the racism, the more it is.
Dear Scroo
Ok issues do not matter, just the face and his acceptability. I am seriously though drawn to an introspective article written a while back by a top Malay scholar turned ST Journalist about her identity as a Malay in Singapore. One of the more quirky observations though was how she felt as a Malay scholar her successes were celebrated as a community or a kampung. What stuck me if that we had a chinese scholar we would not think any more of it as Chinese I mean.
Food for thought but does a Malay Candidate have to represent aspirational community desires in order to lead that part of the community. AKA, Successful Malay Grad, or well regarded Muslim Scholar etc etc ?
Locke
You hit the nail on its head - whether they like it or not, whether the rest of Singapore likes it or not, it has to be a succesful Malay leader, a successful Malay businessman etc. This is central in all things at least for the near future. Interestingly they do not like it but they are stuck with it.
Here is another item thats interesting. Why did Dinah Suhaimi article took the country by storm including Tommy Koh and Kanwaljit Soin?
Then, I would say, opposition will not get such Malay candidates whether we like it or not.
Successful Malay Leader has to be in PAP's establishment to stay successful. Similarly for successful businessman.
Goh Meng Seng