... And certainly there's a separation between opinions and facts ...
my dear bro,
it is exactly here that draws the line of contention. what are opinions and what are facts?
if opinions are personal deductions, be it logical or not, based on pre-existing concepts held by an individual; then these deductions would have been rather dependent on the past experiences and imagery conjure up by the individual.
we could see that opinions would be rather subjective, for even the same color would not even appear the same to two persons. in short, our opinions would be rather limited by our rudimentary senses.
if facts are like scientific theories, e.g. the force of gravity, then it would be limited by the current laws of physics and the space-time structure we now are familiar with. is it really objective then?
as we know it, theories would only hold water if the physical conditions are met, else we wouldn't be able to put so many satellites up in the sky with any of them come crashing down.
so we see now see both opinions and facts being limited by our judgment and its physical conditions, so which is right?
both could be right or both could be wrong, it could be mutually inclusive and at the same time mutually exclusive. and to sum it up, i'd believe most of us already known it, it boils down to choice.