• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Deep inside, malays are Taoist.

I won't exactly said that bumi policy is garbage ,some form of lifting the bumis was necessary since the British side lined the natives ...so a correction was needed ..but today the same is no longer needed as there are very backwards Indians and chinese too ...but the politicians want it that way since they get majority votes

PAP did the same here ...their 75% chinese at any cost ,mandarin campaign and HDB racial quota are some of their discriminatory practices
Nope. The politicians found a way of enriching themselves from it.
 
he would be interesting. one of the things I ran across was that he insisted on not being treated as a son of god or someone of divine conception. Merely a human with a message.

Very strange. I get the opposite conclusion from the people he ordered killed for criticizing him. Here's one example.

From Ibn Sa`d's Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir, translated by S. Moinul Haq, volume 2, pages 30-31.

SARIYYAH OF `UMAYR IBN `ADI
Then (occurred) the sariyyah of `Umayr ibn `Adi Ibn Kharashah al-Khatmi against `Asma' Bint Marwan, of Banu Umayyah Ibn Zayd, when five nights had remained from the month of Ramadan, in the beginning of the nineteenth month from the hijrah of the apostle of Allah. `Asma' was the wife of Yazid Ibn Zayd Ibn Hisn al-Khatmi. She used to revile Islam, offend the prophet and instigate the (people) against him. She composed verses. Umayr Ibn Adi came to her in the night and entered her house. Her children were sleeping around her. There was one whom she was suckling. He searched her with his hand because he was blind, and separated the child from her. He thrust his sword in her chest till it pierced up to her back. Then he offered the morning prayers with the prophet at al-Medina. The apostle of Allah said to him: "Have you slain the daughter of Marwan?" He said: "Yes. Is there something more for me to do?" He [Muhammad] said: "No. Two goats will butt together about her. This was the word that was first heard from the apostle of Allah. The apostle of Allah called him `Umayr, "basir" (the seeing).
 
.but the politicians want it that way since they get majority votes

The m&d moslems want it because they can discriminate against the non moslems in accordance to their religious teachings. I haven't encountered any moslem who said it was a sin for islamic governments to discriminate against non-believers. In jiuhu, moslems were stirred by their religious preachers into marching in favor of racial/religious discrimination. To end racial privileges for m&ds was akin to an attack on their religion islam, not on their m&d race.
 
now ,it was PAP that began to divide education and by that token charitable organization along racial basis ..it started with Mendaki ,the excuse was its best a racial organisations catering to specifically racial needs ..that begets SINDA for. Indians and CDAC for chinese....the question is
we could have simply 1 organisation to cater to poor students ,regardless of races but it was PAP idea and brainchild to separate charitable organization on racial basis

Here's an interesting article about complaint regarding mendaki not helping moslems but m&ds/moslems only.

https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/20...-about-mendaki-and-apparent-double-standards/
 
Last edited:
Very strange. I get the opposite conclusion from the people he ordered killed for criticizing him. Here's one example.

From Ibn Sa`d's Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir, translated by S. Moinul Haq, volume 2, pages 30-31.

SARIYYAH OF `UMAYR IBN `ADI
Then (occurred) the sariyyah of `Umayr ibn `Adi Ibn Kharashah al-Khatmi against `Asma' Bint Marwan, of Banu Umayyah Ibn Zayd, when five nights had remained from the month of Ramadan, in the beginning of the nineteenth month from the hijrah of the apostle of Allah. `Asma' was the wife of Yazid Ibn Zayd Ibn Hisn al-Khatmi. She used to revile Islam, offend the prophet and instigate the (people) against him. She composed verses. Umayr Ibn Adi came to her in the night and entered her house. Her children were sleeping around her. There was one whom she was suckling. He searched her with his hand because he was blind, and separated the child from her. He thrust his sword in her chest till it pierced up to her back. Then he offered the morning prayers with the prophet at al-Medina. The apostle of Allah said to him: "Have you slain the daughter of Marwan?" He said: "Yes. Is there something more for me to do?" He [Muhammad] said: "No. Two goats will butt together about her. This was the word that was first heard from the apostle of Allah. The apostle of Allah called him `Umayr, "basir" (the seeing).
I don't have the source for my info. Was just told it. So can't verify for you. In any case, contradictions abound.
 
I don't have the source for my info. Was just told it. So can't verify for you. In any case, contradictions abound.

I quote you examples of his past deeds to show you what he's like towards people who criticize him. So I'm not making stuff up, unless his own records are made up.
 
Nobody can say as not much was written about mohamad in the official records.
Most are from hearsay.
 
I don't have the source for my info. Was just told it. So can't verify for you. In any case, contradictions abound.

I did mention to u before. We dont accept weak hadiths. Most were fabricated reports. Also be sure to read it in whole context. If really need to know the truth, get it from the horses mouth too. Google or ask any Muslim bros here. I am sure we will try to assist if its within our knowledge. If u only get info from people who are anti Islam, u will never know the truth. No contradictions. Either tat PAP cock sucker telling a lie or telling the "truth" like how he praised his master MIW sky high 24/7.

OK...this the link for ur info.

https://answering-islam.net/Responses/Menj/asma_afak1.htm
 
Last edited:
I did mention to u before. We dont accept weak hadiths. Most were fabricated reports. Also be sure to read it in whole context. If really need to know the truth, get it from the horses mouth too. Google or ask any Muslim bros here. I am sure we will try to assist if its within our knowledge. If u only get info from people who are anti Islam, u will never know the truth. No contradictions. Either tat PAP cock sucker telling a lie or telling the "truth" like how he praised his master MIW sky high 24/7.

OK...this the link for ur info.

https://answering-islam.net/Responses/Menj/asma_afak1.htm
All hadith should be rejected. You don't need it. Its not verifiable. Just based on hearsay or made up.
 
What for? The deeper you go into religion, the further you go away from being blissful.
really kah? ...but it's you who is incesesly spilling viles and bile here day in and day out ..@whoami ,comes far more grounded at peace with his religion ...but you venomous wanting to kill his peace
 
Nobody can say as not much was written about mohamad in the official records.
Most are from hearsay.

Is this also hearsay?

Umm Qirfa was a honoured[1] and old Arab leader of the pagan tribe of Banu Fazara in Wadi Al-Qura. She was the wife of Malik ibn Hudhayfa ibn Badr al-Fazari.[2] She was killed by Zayd ibn Haritha on the orders of Muhammad “by putting a rope into her two legs and to two camels and driving them until they rent her in two....”.[3][4] Her severed head was later paraded all over the streets of Medina.[5]

Ibn Ishaq, the "first biographer" of Muhammad writes that:

Allah’s Messenger sent Zayd to Wadi Qura, where he encountered the Banu Fazarah. Some of his Companions were killed, and Zayd was carried away wounded. Ward was slain by the Banu Badr. When Zayd returned, he vowed that no washing should touch his head until he had raided the Fazarah. After he recovered, Muhammad sent him with an army against the Fazarah settlement. He met them in Qura and inflicted casualties on them and took Umm Qirfah prisoner. He also took one of Umm’s daughters and Abdallah bin Mas’adah prisoner. Ziyad bin Harithah ordered Qays to kill Umm Qirfah, and he killed her cruelly. He tied each of her legs with a rope and tied the ropes to two camels, and they split her in two.
 
Here is the problem with Muslims and many religion. Their foundations are flawed. The deeeper they go into religion to find answers, the worse the situation becomes.
It's like communism. If the theory does not work, communist abandon their ideal and becomes capitalist like what Russia and china did.
But you cannot do this with religion.
Hence countries that are economically successful and on the top of U.N. most liveable countries are mostly secular. Religion is a option their citizens can practice.
 
Is this also hearsay?

Umm Qirfa was a honoured[1] and old Arab leader of the pagan tribe of Banu Fazara in Wadi Al-Qura. She was the wife of Malik ibn Hudhayfa ibn Badr al-Fazari.[2] She was killed by Zayd ibn Haritha on the orders of Muhammad “by putting a rope into her two legs and to two camels and driving them until they rent her in two....”.[3][4] Her severed head was later paraded all over the streets of Medina.[5]

Ibn Ishaq, the "first biographer" of Muhammad writes that:

Allah’s Messenger sent Zayd to Wadi Qura, where he encountered the Banu Fazarah. Some of his Companions were killed, and Zayd was carried away wounded. Ward was slain by the Banu Badr. When Zayd returned, he vowed that no washing should touch his head until he had raided the Fazarah. After he recovered, Muhammad sent him with an army against the Fazarah settlement. He met them in Qura and inflicted casualties on them and took Umm Qirfah prisoner. He also took one of Umm’s daughters and Abdallah bin Mas’adah prisoner. Ziyad bin Harithah ordered Qays to kill Umm Qirfah, and he killed her cruelly. He tied each of her legs with a rope and tied the ropes to two camels, and they split her in two.
Based on Muslim holy book, they are forbidden to kill as I understand it. If there are contradictions, then the holy book itself has fault.
 
Back
Top