CST's Wife Falling into 154th's Trap!

[lockeliberal]

Dear Chau

Liquids. Salts, Coffee Tea Orange Juice the same as Glucose. Really ? If SO why is glucose a key component to force feed hunger strikers ? Are all liquids equal at sustaining life and keeping a body healthy like Glucose Chee ?



Locke

 

[Chau Ve Nist]

Dear Chau Your selective editing of history is again amazing. I give you a wikipedia account of the whole Tianmen Square Protests including the Hunger Strikers. The link and excerpt is given below

You must be a bloody cock to rely on and quote from Wiki. Try quoting from Wiki and you will be laughed out of a gathering of the learned.

The article I quoted was taken from an award-winning journal, "Index on Censorship". The full reference is:

Xiaobo, Liu , Duo, Zhou , Dejian, Hou andXin, Gao(1989) 'Tiananmen Square', Index on Censorship Vol. 18 no 8 pp 32 to 45​

MY, you are as daft as you are stubborn. This is the problem when you are known to your group of colleagues and party members in a forum where you and they participate in.

It ends up with you having to fight tooth and nail even though your face has been grounded in sand and plastered in shit and you have been shown up to be loud but hollow and empty.

Why don't you reveal to everyone here that several years ago, you posted a strident and insulting post on the SDP website, got ticked off and shown up for a fool and that's is one of the primary reasons for your hatred of Chee Soon Juan.

 

[Chau Ve Nist]

Dear Chau
Liquids. Salts, Coffee Tea Orange Juice the same as Glucose. Really ? If SO why is glucose a key component to force feed hunger strikers ? Are all liquids equal at sustaining life and keeping a body healthy like Glucose Chee ?
Locke

Any reason why you left out "sugared water" that was in my statement? Because you will fall flat on your face again. No?

Talk to a doctor or nutritionist if you want to learn more. I can't keep teaching people like you who have no desire to learn but wallow in the m&d of your shallow pride and ignorance.

Have a good weekend bro. I am off to write my letter of recommendation to the Noble Peace Prize Committee for you.

 

[lockeliberal]

Dear Chau

Actually you might take a look at the list of citations below for the Wiki article :_)). Am I really plastered in shit :_)) Well thats for readers to judge from the strength of our respective positions and arguments.

Grin and whatever arguments and whether I have shown up to be a fool or not is well the past, I post I argue and I debate and people especially the well read and the intelligent can chose to take me with a pinch of salt or not




Locke

 

[lockeliberal]

Dear Chau

Sugared water is well sugar and water :_)) but then as we go into specifics we will be arguing about the differences between well mixing sugar and water and taking life sustaining glucose and water. There must be a reason why a liquid diet in a hospital includes glucose drips and not a sugar water mix.



Locke

 

[Ramseth]

Sugared water is well sugar and water :_)) but then as we go into specifics we will be arguing about the differences between well mixing sugar and water and taking life sustaining glucose and water. There must be a reason why a liquid diet in a hospital includes glucose drips and not a sugar water mix.

What I undertsand is that you won't drop dead once your bloodstream has two minerals at sufficient levels, sugar and salt. Sugar used in hospital drips is usually glucose and salt is usually potassium. Glucose is healthier than sugar and potassium is healthier than sodium, I guess.

 

[lockeliberal]

Dear Chau

An "award winning magazine" versus an "award winning journal" shades of liquids is ok therefore, glucose is ok for glucose chee ?



Thanks

Locke

 

[kingrant]

Am I not taking you on now? What's so special about you? You are just a phoney trying to abuse others to agree with you.

Exactly..me a CO runner was only a suspect..nothing grounded in proofs, just as yr ravings and ramblings here about yr fakey, flaky, phoney, b.s. hunger strikes. And don't try to team yrself with those two. You are out of their league anyway. My runner can crush you anytime.

You can't take on a newbie like me, how in the fucking world are you going to take on the Malaysians and invade Johore and zip and zap every enemy on sight? With your infraction machine gun?

I expect better from someone like you who claims that he has conducted Bridgade level planning. Look like the poster who suspected that you were nothing more than a boastful little CO's runner was right after all.

 

[kingrant]

Locke,

I think we have to believe that Einstein when he said that the FAO IS the foremost expert on hunger strikes. I heard he has been commended by FAO for the Nobel Prize for Hunger.

Dear Chau

Actually you might take a look at the list of citations below for the Wiki article :_)). Am I really plastered in shit :_)) Well thats for readers to judge from the strength of our respective positions and arguments.

Grin and whatever arguments and whether I have shown up to be a fool or not is well the past, I post I argue and I debate and people especially the well read and the intelligent can chose to take me with a pinch of salt or not




Locke

 

[Chau Ve Nist]

Dear Chau
Actually you might take a look at the list of citations below for the Wiki article :_)). Am I really plastered in shit :_)) Locke

Yes you are...plastered in shit that is.

In case you don't know, Wiki is a joke in academia. Just check with any academics. Anyone can write any crap in there and put up some rubbish reference. Put Wiki as your source in the world of academia and you will be deemed to be a nitwit or a retard.

If you want to, you can even put up the rubbish you have spouted here about hunger strikes and I can even add into your Wikipage that you've won a Nobel Peace Prize for your rubbish and it will remain in Wiki so long as you have the energy to contantly edit the rubbish that is in it. Needless to say, some nitwit or dimwit will then come along and, just like you, will quote the Wiki page as though it is a highly regarded source.

BTW, there were already thousands in Tiananmen in May 1989 and in other cities in China who were on hunger strikes before the four, Liu Xiaobo, Zhou Duo, Hou Dejian, Gao Xin started a new one at the Heroes Monument in June 1989. I referred to this four hunger strikers for the simple reason that they had specified a period of three days for their hunger strike. As a matter of fact, one of them, Hou Dejian's commitment was for two and not three days as he had a recording commitment in Hongkong. (Source: Massacre in Beijing 2008 In Modern China p 621 New York Harper Collins)

Now you know why you should not source from Wiki?

Cheers Bro.

PS: Will let you know the Nobel Peace Prize committee decision soon. Your chances of winning have improved tremendously now that you have quoted from Wiki.

 

[Chau Ve Nist]

Am I not taking you on now? What's so special about you? You are just a phoney trying to abuse others to agree with you.

I know. The lettuce you are taking me on with is causing me tremendous pain.

By the way and on serious note, I hope you don't feel abused. I am merely trying to teach those like lockeliberal who are very humble and open to learning that they should not spout rubbish and falsehoods just because they hate a person.

CSJ is CSJ. A hunger strike is a hunger strike. The world of hunger strikes cannot be changed just for you - not unless you are a Nobel Peace Prize winner - just because you hate one Chee Soon Juan.

Cheers Bro. I know Singapore is safe from the Malaysians because of patriotic soldiers like you. You are a good man.

 

[Ramseth]

Locke, Wiki is referential but non authoritative.

Chau, there's nothing wrong with glucose intake in hunger strike, even if voluntary.

 

[lockeliberal]

Dear Chau

Actually its the list of citations cited and linked to Wiki which I have suggested you look at but which you have declined to even consider. I have noticed you have dropped your claim of Index of Censorship as a "journal" of any repute or academic standing and we have gone to book citations.

Regardless since we are quoting books now , lets go grab books and accounts of Tianamen 1989 and debate the issue to death as to hunger strikes and hunger strikers.



Locke

 

[Perspective]

You have to put yourself in an Einsten/Hawkings mode, i.e. if you can, to understand.

Sure, sure...

 

[lockeliberal]

Dear Ramseth

Honestly if voluntary it defeats the purpose of a hunger strike as it sustains life, whereas the purpose of a hunger strike is political pressure and the threat of damage to one's health. You would have noticed how Chau lumps a lot of liquids together and treats them all the same whereas they are very different.



Locke

 

[lockeliberal]

Dear Chau

But you have to look at those four figures and the others who were willing to die for the cause but never mind I will look up and give you references about those who were willing to die :_)) as a form of public protest.



Locke

 

[Ramseth]

Honestly if voluntary it defeats the purpose of a hunger strike as it sustains life, whereas the purpose of a hunger strike is political pressure and the threat of damage to one's health. You would have noticed how Chau lumps a lot of liquids together and treats them all the same whereas they are very different.

Honestly, do you think he should die to satisfy your criteria of protest? When you don't even agree with the issue in protest anyway.

A person who agreed passionately with the issue in protest have moral grounds to ask, why didn't Dr. Chee go all the way?

You have none. You disagreed with the issue. What happened to him or his protest is none of your business, unless he succeeded, which he didn't.

You really think he should starve himself suicidically to earn your approval? I shudder.

 

[Chau Ve Nist]

Chau, there's nothing wrong with glucose intake in hunger strike, even if voluntary.

That's what I have told these chaps but according to Nobel Prize Winner lockliberal and his merry men, it is a grevious sin.

For him, just because it involves one Chee Soon Juan, it is "cheating".

 

[Chau Ve Nist]

Dear Chau
I have noticed you have dropped your claim of Index of Censorship as a "journal" of any repute or academic standing and we have gone to book citations.

Locke

What "dropped your claim" rubbish are you blabbering about this time around?

I have not dropped any claim. I can't be teaching you every damn thing especially when you are so humble and open to learning and more importantly, a Noble Peace Prize winner to be. The next thing you will be arguing aimlessly about and asking me is why your cock hair is crinkly and not straight.

Just because you google the name I gave you and saw "award winning magazine", you jump sky high thinking you have some too clever-by-half
point to make or some little points to score.

Make your way to NUS. Ask any academic or librarian why publications such as "Index on Censorship" are classified as "journals" and are not in the category of Mad Magazine even as their name carries the word "magazine" in them.

Lucky for you that you are a Nobel Prize Winner to be and an expert on hunger strikes. Otherwise, I won't bother to teach you. You are a difficult student. Daft but stubborn. Ignorant but want to act smart. These attitudes are serious impediments to learning.

 

[Ramseth]

Locke is NUS and LSE.