• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chee, SDP and the letters!

Porfirio Rubirosa

Alfrescian
Loyal
think u got me wrong Bro...i was looking at the entire farce being played out...particularly fm the time James was arrested at the airport straight after GE06'...by this time i doubt LTK bothered abt James' personal predicament...


Deftly? Classy? James Gomez? Wake up my friend. The response and defence after the cockup were all orchestrated and enforced by LTK and some others in CEC, to save the overall party campaign screwed by JG.
 

cleareyes

Alfrescian
Loyal
Why is this focus on a letter that would do more harm than good for the opposition?

Chee has his intent and it is showing. I dont think he and even the rest of SDPcare very much about winning the votes and reducing PAP's stronghold. The lack of positive objective can kill and losing the middle ground support seems very very possible now.

The question is: what can the opposition ( without SDP meddling) do to rekindle support before it falls off further? The opposition might have 25% in the bag as we all know that 25% are strict opposition supporters no matter what. How about the 50% middle ground? That should be the focus and nowhere else.
 

Porfirio Rubirosa

Alfrescian
Loyal
this does not appear to be a black n white issue...more grey n murky...just like life & history in general...

on balance a significant majority of singaporeans hv by n large gained fm Harry's governance(note i am sticking up to when he stepped down as PM in 90' or was it 91'?)...Harry appeared to be right abt say 70% of time which is pretty good going looking at our surrounding neighbours development between 59' to 90/91'...also as far as i know...nobody detained by Harry's ISD/security forces were murdered or suffered serious physical injuries...no doubt the periods of detention wifout trial especially in the cases of Chia Thye Poh, Dr Lim Hock Siew, Zaid etc caused a diffrent sort of suffering wif wide long lasting n painful ramifications...but sadly n unfortunately this is part n parcel of dynamic forces at play in the development n progress of any society...there is rarely a situation if any of 100% good being played out...

history shall determine Harry's legacy in due course...meanwhile as Teo Soh Lung has said:"...let us get on with our lives"...

Singaporeans by and large do not walk on a moral ground. They are bread and butter issues first and foremost and secondly they would like to be seen as nice people.

CSJ is making at least two generations of Singaporeans know of the dirty deeds of LKY, the gecko and the PAP. At least two generations of Singaporeans do not know a lot about Singapore as they have been imbued with fascist propaganda from the PAP.

YOu may not agree with the letter or its timing but I am sure that you agree with its contents. No?
 

Porfirio Rubirosa

Alfrescian
Loyal
to be fair to Dr Chee & SDP...they did first come out wif a pure ltr of condolence first...

As a sec-gen of an opposition party, he should have separated what he wanted to said into 2 letters. 1 purely a letter of condolence and the other, how people were detained for years by LKY.

.
 

Porfirio Rubirosa

Alfrescian
Loyal
tks for this timely reminder Bro...LHL was definitely ungracious n out of order on this one...
So the following letters from PM Lee to JBJ's sons is gracious?

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong wrote a condolence letter on the demise of JBJ, addressed to JBJ’s sons Kenneth and Philip Jeyaretnam.


PM Lee wrote that JBJ “used to engage in heated debates” in Parliament probably because “he and the PAP never saw eye to eye on any major political issue and he sought by all means to demolish the PAP and our system of government“.

PM Lee said that this “helped neither to build up a constructive opposition nor our Parliamentary tradition
“.


Please read and re-read those UNDERLINED "consolation".
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Keep avoiding issue. By now you should know that labeling has never bothered me. Ptader found that out after years of calling people dishonest, fraud but never bothered to tackle the issue does not resolve anything.

So what did your imagination say about Chee's cryptic message to the old man.


You are a truly a dishonest guy. Amazing.
 

Porfirio Rubirosa

Alfrescian
Loyal
u forget Harry's "heavyweight political opponents" made the fatal error of boycotting the first GE after independance in 65'...the rest as they say is history...

My definition of a "political victory" is where political opponents go head to head in a campaign to win over the electorate. Lee's heavyweight political opponents never got that opportunity.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Pointless avoiding the issue by writing long stories.

Wow. Again trying to deceive the readers I am from SDP, realising the letter was too direct, a blunder and trying to suggest it is a tongue-in-cheek or cryptic.

This thread is not that long. Anyone can just glance up a few posts. You are definitely a confidence trickster.

First, you put words in my mouth by saying it is cryptic when I clearly think otherwise.

Then I ask why don't you accuse me of suggesting something ridiculous like it is "tongue-in-cheek" or "poetic".

On another post, you accused me of suggesting the letter to JBJ was cryptic.

Now, you claimed I am suggesting Chee's letter is tongue-in-cheek.

Conman!
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
I agree. It made old man and his nephew-in-law look bad. Even Chua sister elder made the point.


think u got me wrong Bro...i was looking at the entire farce being played out...particularly fm the time James was arrested at the airport straight after GE06'...by this time i doubt LTK bothered abt James' personal predicament...
 

Porfirio Rubirosa

Alfrescian
Loyal
Bro

The evil that men do lives after them;
The good is oft interred with their bones;


For me, Karma will find its way to go round. What you do unto others, others will do unto you. The PAP has not been kind in their words and actions towards people like JBJ who are against them. It is a matter whether one would showcase their kindness and empathy towards their most vicious enemies or opponent but it is totally another cup of tea for people like Locke to "demand" kindness towards the PAP while ignoring the fact that they are not that kind of people who would be kind to others, even in times of grief and mourning. It would be a bonus if people actually empathize and sympathize with their opponents in grief even though knuckle dusters have been used in every fight but it would only be natural for those who have suffered from such bashing to be unkind towards their bullies even when they are in mourning. That is karmic reaction, so to speak.
 

Porfirio Rubirosa

Alfrescian
Loyal
not 100% clear...generally speaking PAP left that split fm Harry's PAP right were Maoist Commie sympathisers at the v least...
They weren't communists. They were socialists. The "communist" label was used simply to justify the use of the ISA.



The Barisan Socialist Manifesto in 1963 pretty much reflected what many Singaporeans are asking of the govt today.. .
 

Porfirio Rubirosa

Alfrescian
Loyal
gee wiz...i said POST GE06'...election results already done n dusted bro...
QUOTE=Thick Face Black Heart;580814]How can LTK not bother. It affects votes (even if favourably)[/QUOTE]
 

Porfirio Rubirosa

Alfrescian
Loyal
got me wrong Bro...i was specifically directing my ans to the bro who appears to think that Dr Chee/SDP only issued 1 ltr of condolence...
Based on your reasoning, a rapist might say he used the word "please" initially so it's ok to rape a victim following that.
 

cass888

Alfrescian
Loyal
You mean you don't understand what I say just now? :wink:

Goh Meng Seng

No. You have not had the guts to give an unequivocal answer. :biggrin:

The question was simple - do you endorse or condemn the letters? Answering a question with another question to evade answering is disingenuous but won't work if you are exposed to be doing as such.
 

rainnix

Alfrescian
Loyal
CSJ probably chose to release this letter at this time due the the focus of the country is on KGC's death and her funeral. Letter is timed for the maximum impact with the most people getting to read the letter.

What I persumed I understand from the letter is that - it is a mix of sincerity to plea MM to repent and let him(CSJ) off coupled with intent to list out the facts of his past evil deeds and to goad at him.
 
Top