• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

All Cecilia Sue stuff here please....

Re: Cecilia Sue is depressed

when its a woman, not surprisingly the courts would exercise more leniency. ironic part is, these bitches are the real devils and instead come up with shit like emotions and so on to get it their way.

She can say her menses causing her to behave irrationally....
 
The point that I am making is that prosecution does not have to prove gratification is linked to soemthing. The law requires that Ng, the accused to prove that it is not gratification and that it is not linked.

That is why I stated that people do struggle when money is given or a paid holiday but struggle with sex.

Teh Cheng Wan's case involved a very good long time family friend. Teh must have had solid legal advice on his probability of conviction. Excuses like family friends, custom, tradition, love cannot fly when you are in position of conflict. If he was a bus driver she can such his dick to kingdom come for all to know.

He was in position to influence her company projects. Whether he did or not is irrelevant. What is relevant are 2 things (1) position of conflict (2) gratification received.

If sex is not gratification, I will chop my dick.


The key question is what constitutes gratification. Is having feeling for the other party, with or without sex, so important as far as gratification is concerned? The "gratification" has to be linked to the other side of the bargain, the award of a contract. The state of being friendly or an ex-classmate to another party itself does not constitutes gratification. Gratification has to be defined as gratification for what.



I guess the defendant lawyer will argue on the existence of gratification, tender influence and the logicality of the award as a last resort. If in throwing a random dart, you hit the awarded product 70% of the time, it can be argued that the award is just a pure coincidence. A good example is: if you are looking for tablets, there is a very good chance that you will be getting an iPad because its market share is so dominating.
 
That could be the prosecution's main argument that it's corruption and not just affair/sex/love. :D

it has more to do with code of conduct, but what they need to prove first is conflict of interest by linking simultaneity of loose sordid love affair and strict buyer-supplier business protocol clashing with each other, despite whether or not need to blow groin has direct influence on the selection and purchasing decision. conflict of interest, though a code of conduct issue, can lead to corruption, and that the prosecution has to prove. the juicy details and lies are there for shaming effect, nothing more.
 
Last edited:
I am trying to understand under what circumstances Ng can recieve a BJ from Cecilia and not contravene the Act. He declares to CNB he is involved with this woman and do not interfere in the procurement process? He has to move away from his position? Or there is NO way he can recieve a BJ in his current position ??

if nbg is already in an affair with cs, and a bid process is outstanding between a prospective supplier and the buyer organizations in which these two lovebirds work in, not just as lowly clerks and cleaners but as director and account executive respectively, the right thing to do is for either one, especially nbg, to recuse oneself from any possibility of impropriety, direct and indirect influence, and conflict of interest. that declaration should be made by nbg to his boss prior to any bid process. it's a code of conduct issue but not a criminal offense. however, by not recusing himself and declaring possible conflict of issue to his superior, it can lead to corruption, which in sg, is a criminal offense. the prosecution has to prove that corruption arises as a result of conflict of interest. that, imo, is hard to prove unless there's evidence of impropriety such as nbg's signature on the final contract after the bid.
 
Re: Cecilia Sue is depressed

<iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/w6qe1gVj9Yk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>......./////
 
His position matters a lot...even in usa, one turd had to go when he screwed a subordinate...consent is not an issue here...you can question why but law as stated by the DPP should be accurate. Which also makes me wonder why prosecution try turn this into almost a rape case...to me that is bad because if they prove then people ask why not rape charge, if they lose that aspect the whole testimony is suspect...mind you he never deny affair...


May be cs demand that right to save face...and convince husband...had she denied whole thing case would collapse...
 
Last edited:
It probably because she was reluctant to testify that she offered sex freely. To save face, they allowed her to say her version. All they needed was make sure that sex gievn was mentioned. The case is not about rape or coercion. One of many ways to skin a cat.

Ng must have conceded sex in his statement to the CPIB. He cannot now backtrack he thus relying on love.

His position matters a lot...even in usa, one turd had to go when he screwed a subordinate...consent is not an issue here...you can question why but law as stated by the DPP should be accurate. Which also makes me wonder why prosecution try turn this into almost a rape case...to me that is bad because if they prove then people ask why not rape charge, if they lose that aspect the whole testimony is suspect...mind you he never deny affair...


May be cs demand that right to save face...and convince husband...had she denied whole thing case would collapse...
 
Is CS trying to get NBG off the hook by giving

conflicting testimonies in court?
 
I am trying to understand under what circumstances Ng can recieve a BJ from Cecilia and not contravene the Act. He declares to CNB he is involved with this woman and do not interfere in the procurement process? He has to move away from his position? Or there is NO way he can recieve a BJ in his current position ??


Can . There are French Cooking Class

. There is also Ice Cream Making

class . And Javanese Massage Class. :)
 
this cecilia is really a bimbo only good at using her bj and body to win contract. i know some sales "directors" macam very "gam" with u, walk near near, talk near near like can kiss your ears. i think she is this type, like to do "bonding" with customers, so customers will not leave her. this is very common in sales line. especially IT contracts.
 
He was in position to influence her company projects. Whether he did or not is irrelevant. What is relevant are 2 things (1) position of conflict (2) gratification received.

If sex is not gratification, I will chop my dick.

How much of a gratification would a BJ give you? To many people, a BJ is only one component of a total service that costs not much more than a hundred dollars, a service which can be available practically at will any day at Geylang. For a person of NBG's standing, can such a thing by itself be an inducement enough to amount to gratification for anything?

As for position of conflict, it happens all the time. Someone who is a bidder could be a distant or even close relative, a friend, a platoon mate, an incumbent tenderer which he has working relation with for some time. Would'nt all these relationships qualify as position of conflict? So how can being in a position of conflict by itself be an evidence of crime without involving a measure of the degree of conflict?

To overcome conflict of interest, some people make a declaration of conflict if they feel that they are in a position to make a decision that conflict of interest could be brought into play and in many cases, they would exclude themselves from the decision-making. But if position of conflict is taken to the letter, position of conflict will happen very frequently. For practical reasons, most people will make some subjective assessment on how their position of conflict can affect the performance of their duties and not in all cases of possible conflict will they exclude themselves. Given this, their subjective assessment of their influence in the decision-making becomes an important factor.

If the two conditions of gratification and position of conflict can be pre-determined before trial and there is no hope, why would the defendant lawyers recommend NBG to stand trial?
 
Last edited:
Re: "When you want to take in?" - Ex-CNB's Director's catch-phrase

As she gave her testimony in a meek voice, Ng appeared expressionless while his wife, Madam Yap Yen Yen, busily jotted down notes, wearing a stern frown.


Looks like someone's wife going back home to pull his ears

Or for the big money divorce case thats sure to akan datang.....
 
Re: Cecilia Sue denies having sex with Ng at Great World City apartment

By Tham Yuen-C


The incident where the two allegedly had sexual intercourse was debated during defense counsel Tan Chee Meng's cross-examination of Ms Sue.

Referring to the first statement Ms Sue, 36, gave to the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau in December last year, Mr Tan pointed out that she had told CPIB investigators that she had sex with Ng, 46, at a service apartment in Great World City in 2009.

But in court on Thursday, she reneged on the facts of the statement, saying it was not true and had been given while she was under stress

Was that statement given while she was under STRESS or taken under DURESS? - even if she was a Witness.

SC Tan should break her down and demolish her credibility. Her statement to CPIB should be thrown out.......

Maybe someone should set up a School where CPIB officers can learn the finer points of obtaining a statement from accused or witnesses.
 
Re: Cecilia Sue caught on video today

She behaves like a celebrity. My god, does she need "bodyguards".

Those "Bodyguards" with spectacles. I scared leh.......................

Are they members of the American Secret Service loaned to Cissisue (no relations to late Ceaucescu) by the American Dept of Justice?

I believe so because ORACLE is based in the US.....
 
Ng must have conceded sex in his statement to the CPIB. He cannot now backtrack he thus relying on love.[/QUOTE]

They admit affair even publicly in opening statement....so no point of DPP focusing on molest , no of encounters , exact act performed etc that is just theatrics....case hinge on whether this argument that there is no corruption is true or not...law presumes guilt but allows you to prove otherwise...

He can do that if he can show to things...one is the affair started much earlier so nothing to do with this job and secondly he was no way involved in vendor selection.

But now that element of force is brought out by cs, he also had to show consent....i think he easily can do that. But that does not help in main case it help him avoid much more serious charge, even caning for assault.
 
Back
Top