• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

All Cecilia Sue stuff here please....

In addition, who on earth, upon seeing a girl, will straightaway pull down pants and expect a BJ? Whatever happened to kissing, licking her nipples, squeezing the breasts, stroking her thighs, touching her pussy from the outside first, then slowly masuk fingers into her panty to finger her etc etc and then the BJ.

That could be the prosecution's main argument that it's corruption and not just affair/sex/love. :D
 
When a person tell lie he needed 10 more lies to cover that one lie ..eventucally the truth will be out ;)

I am sure you will agree with me that human beings remember the truth quite easily but will forget the lies told. Very difficult to remember lies told. Worse, when need many lies to cover just one lie. Brain can implode. I see that taking place in NBG's trial with CS taking the stand.
 
Re: Cecilia Sue is depressed

The wife truly pales in comparison to the fling.

Mrs Ng Boon Gay may pale in comparison with NBG's "fling" as far as facial appearance is concerned.

She may loose out to the slut Cissi Yeow Siew Kia in cunningness and deceit.

But she possess all the excellent virtues of a good and loyal wife who stands by her husband in such a dark period of his life and career.

May NBG be cleared and may the couple remain happily married till the end of their lives.

As sor the slut, @#$%^&*+(nothing else to say)
 
The Prevention of Corruption Act is a masterful piece of legislation. It is rather short but has some novel and interesting clauses that binds the court.

For example, the court cannot tag a person who provided the gratification and appeared as witness for the prosectuion as a person unworthy of credit. So for example if she opened her legs everyday to everyone in the civil service and testified to the effect, she has to be considered creditworthy unless her testismony is tainted or false. Morality cannot be considered including being a highly manipulative individual.

She denying having had sex in the apartment despite giving a statement to the effect will certainly question her trustworthyness but all it means to the court is that she only gave $5k and not $8k as an analogy

Also unlike most criminal cases, accused persons under this Act cannot be charged in court without the expressed consent of AG Chambers. In fact it is easier to proceed under discplinary departmental action.

By the way, mutual consent has absolutely no part to play in a corruption case. Corruption does not require any form of coercion. If Ng can convince the court that only she can suck his dick to allow him to live another 10 years due to a rare ailment, he got a fighting chance. That argument or the like must be presented by him. No need to for the prosecution to do any thing.


Scroo, I think u read too much into this case. It is actually not so straight forward. The key word is gratification. If it was mutual consent, then there is no gratification..no gain just like each person patting themselves on the back! Other thing of course is that due process was followed and he exert no due influence on the decision making process. Now that Cecilia has testified othewise, he has to prove that she is a liar.
 
She's a Prosecution Witness. Deal would have been struck earlier. No jail term for her. Make or break, CPIB depends on her.

I have to agree with some comments from bros here. She like PrataMan, statement peng here and there like flipping prata. I can never understand how NBG managed to put his prickin if CS didn't want it. Not easy and I speak from experience.

In addition, who on earth, upon seeing a girl, will straightaway pull down pants and expect a BJ? Whatever happened to kissing, licking her nipples, squeezing the breasts, stroking her thighs, touching her pussy from the outside first, then slowly masuk fingers into her panty to finger her etc etc and then the BJ.

PO Li GAO aka glass dog aka prosecutor sure fuck CPIB this kind of case still can bring to court behind close door .
 
I am sure you will agree with me that human beings remember the truth quite easily but will forget the lies told. Very difficult to remember lies told. Worse, when need many lies to cover just one lie. Brain can implode. I see that taking place in NBG's trial with CS taking the stand.

Yes I agree 100% on that .. It's human nature .
 
That could be the prosecution's main argument that it's corruption and not just affair/sex/love. :D

Imo, if NBG already had an affair with her before the 4 kum LJ incidents, it will be to his advantage. If the 4 incidents took place without an earlier affair (just 1 bonk kau liao), an uphill task awaits NBG. Never knew kum LJ can be so troublesome.

I hope NBG knows what to say if DPP asked why no more bonk but need to BJ. If I happen to be his SC, I would suggest this - bonking no thrill coz can make 5 point turn easily. At times, 7 point turn also can. Wtf! BJ more shiok. Tighter. Can?
 
She's a Prosecution Witness. Deal would have been struck earlier. No jail term for her. Make or break, CPIB depends on her.

I have to agree with some comments from bros here. She like PrataMan, statement peng here and there like flipping prata. I can never understand how NBG managed to put his prickin if CS didn't want it. Not easy and I speak from experience.

In addition, who on earth, upon seeing a girl, will straightaway pull down pants and expect a BJ? Whatever happened to kissing, licking her nipples, squeezing the breasts, stroking her thighs, touching her pussy from the outside first, then slowly masuk fingers into her panty to finger her etc etc and then the BJ.

Thats right ... What happen to foreplay ? She thought she is a rape victim attending court Knn
 
Last edited:
PO Li GAO aka glass dog aka prosecutor sure fuck CPIB this kind of case still can bring to court behind close door .

Bro, this case po li kao not involved. DPP prosecuting. Btw, they are doing to shut down the Prosecution Branch of the SPF in due course. Nowadays, got APP to prosecute the less serious cases.
 
Bro, this case po li kao not involved. DPP prosecuting. Btw, they are doing to shut down the Prosecution Branch of the SPF in due course. Nowadays, got APP to prosecute the less serious cases.

Thanks for the infor once again .... Can u be my mentor if something happens to me ? ;)
 
Re: Ng Boon Gay's song to Cecilia then

Cecilia, you're breaking my heart
You're shaking my confidence daily
Oh, Cecilia, I'm hard on my dick
I'm begging you please to cum now

Cecilia, you're breaking my heart
You're shaking my confidence daily
Oh, Cecilia, I'm hard on my dick
I'm begging you please to cum now

Having sex in the afternoon with Cecilia
Up in Mount Faber (making love)
I got up to zip my pants
When I come back to screw
Someone's taken aback
Cecilia, you're breaking my heart
You're shaking my confidence daily
Oh, Cecilia, I'm hard on my dick
I'm begging you please to cum now

Jubilation, she sucks me again,
I fall on the floor and I'm laughing,
Jubilation, she loves me again,
I fall on the floor and I'm laughing

Much apologies to Simon and Garfunkel.

any one want to reform the song for NBG?
 
I hope there is no need for me to be your mentor. But if you need any assistance, my pleasure.

Thankyou boss .. Nobody know what happens tomorrow . If needed any help will pm you . Thankyou once again .
 
The Prevention of Corruption Act is a masterful piece of legislation. It is rather short but has some novel and interesting clauses that binds the court.

For example, the court cannot tag a person who provided the gratification and appeared as witness for the prosectuion as a person unworthy of credit. So for example if she opened her legs everyday to everyone in the civil service and testified to the effect, she has to be considered creditworthy unless her testismony is tainted or false. Morality cannot be considered including being a highly manipulative individual.

She denying having had sex in the apartment despite giving a statement to the effect will certainly question her trustworthyness but all it means to the court is that she only gave $5k and not $8k as an analogy

Also unlike most criminal cases, accused persons under this Act cannot be charged in court without the expressed consent of AG Chambers. In fact it is easier to proceed under discplinary departmental action.

By the way, mutual consent has absolutely no part to play in a corruption case. Corruption does not require any form of coercion. If Ng can convince the court that only she can suck his dick to allow him to live another 10 years due to a rare ailment, he got a fighting chance. That argument or the like must be presented by him. No need to for the prosecution to do any thing.

I am trying to understand under what circumstances Ng can recieve a BJ from Cecilia and not contravene the Act. He declares to CNB he is involved with this woman and do not interfere in the procurement process? He has to move away from his position? Or there is NO way he can recieve a BJ in his current position ??
 
All the prosecution has to be prove is that gratification has been provided by one party to another while there was an official commercial engagement in place which the receipient is in a position to influence.

What is clear is that sex of one form or another had occurred between 2 parties and that is no doubt that both the prosecution and defence have agreed. If Ng shows that he was in love before he went into a position of conflict, there were letters, flowers, courtship rituals etc, all it does is mitigates his case - lesser sentence

The key question is what constitutes gratification. Is having feeling for the other party, with or without sex, so important as far as gratification is concerned? The "gratification" has to be linked to the other side of the bargain, the award of a contract. The state of being friendly or an ex-classmate to another party itself does not constitutes gratification. Gratification has to be defined as gratification for what.

Even on the award of a contract, the final approving officer could only be performing a ceremonial role with the evaluation committee completing the full evaluation independently from the final approving officer. It has to be proven that the approving officer had actually involved himself in steering the award.

In many smaller government tenders, the top guy gets to know the recommendation only when the evaluation is completed and is now seeking his approval. He will just ask a few questions to satisfy himself and then sign. Of course if he keeps refusing to sign until his preferred bidder is recommended, then we can say he is influencing the award (very like the Elected President's role, even though the CEO is executive whereas the President is not). I am saying, in practice, this is how things are done. Only for larger tenders when higher up approval is required does he usually gets involved early to make sure he does not submit something that is stupid.

For a product like Oracle, there is often not many alternative options especially if it is not the core item in the tender and only a complementary component, many bidders will offer this product. Similarly with HDS in storage area networks components in a market like Singapore there are a limited number of suppliers and several bidders will probably quote using the same product as part of their overall solution. Things become a bit more dicey if the product in question is the key product of the tender when different products come into the picture and a choice has to be made between one from another. Again proof of interference needs to be established.

I guess the defendant lawyer will argue on the existence of gratification, tender influence and the logicality of the award as a last resort. If in throwing a random dart, you hit the awarded product 70% of the time, it can be argued that the award is just a pure coincidence. A good example is: if you are looking for tablets, there is a very good chance that you will be getting an iPad because its market share is so dominating.
 
Back
Top