Where's the case when the defendant dun even dare to show up? :p:p:p:p
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Temasek Holdings wants Temasek Review website to change its name
- Thread starter tioliaohuat
- Start date
TLH didn't show up in 1997, but there was case to fought, as JBJ showed up, with George Carmen QC, who belanjah me one of his Dunhill ciggie. I said no smoking in court compound, even outside the coutroom. He said what the hell, want to summon us for illegal smoking? Don't worry, if they do, I'll pay. So we puffed away happily and the court police did nothing.
Anyawy, that was an even more bizzare case as not only one defendant didn't show up, ten plaintiffs (including LKY and LHL) didn't show up too, only GCT showed up.
Last edited:
Why do you think TH will spend that kind of money just to nail one idiot?
Unless of course dat idiot was being made use of by someone larger n there is a bigger political motive behind it.
Either way, yes, JO should leave the country and never return.
The way I see it is they can hardly make a case, what are they going sue Joe Ong for so why should he flee.
If the authorities want to go all the way, (I better not reveal in case Joe is reading this), they have the expertise, skills and know-how to know whether this guy is involved.
TNP won't anyhow hantam. Joe Ong is toast.
Precisely, there's no case.
How do you mean the authorities didnt go all the way, they picked him up and he confessed but they let him go. Criminally he's off the hook, civilly I cant see what they have against him.
Trademark infringement.
There is no case????
If the writ of summon is issued and the person dont show up to answer, then there is a bigger case.
Dont underestimate and ignore the action of a court summon, no matter how low they are. The leevel of authority is the same.
No, TH hardly had a case over TR on that and besides he's no longer the owner unless proven otherwise.
The court cant issue a writ unless there's a case. They may be looking for something else to make up a case, I dont know. Until then all I can see is they hardly had a case.
Nonsense. The court will issue a writ anytime. It is for the two sides to fight it out. So if TH sues Joe, Joe will have to contest even if TH has no case. The expenses will bring Joe to his knees.
It is more interesting to look at Healthway Medical and who is behind it.
if temasek review has to change it's name just bcos of the coincidental similarity in the work "temasek", then surely they should also demand all other institutions/ establishments to change their's too
temasek should sue the singapore sutltan's family for naming singapore temasek! lol
Being grilled by police, Joe already revealed his identity. So you can imagine what will happen when he goes to the court.
The name TR is of no importance to TH. They just want to dig out these "imaginary people" if they are really real:o
joseph's defence is that he has imaginary friends, like those socially dysfunctional kids
For those who doubt the integrity of Finder Uni an TR. The email reply is from Natasha to me. This is a REAL interview email sent by Natasha.
Re: TR InterviewTuesday, 19 October, 2010 9:25 AM
From: "Natasha Cowan" <[email protected]>Add sender to ContactsTo: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Hi yes it is a real request. I am an Australian academic as per my email.
Cheers, Natasha
Sent from my HTC
Natasha Cowan
PhD student
Dept. International Relations
Flinders University
[email protected]
----- Reply message -----
From: "XXXXX" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Oct 18, 2010 10:48 pm
Subject: TR Interview
To: "Natasha Cowan" <[email protected]>
Re: TR InterviewTuesday, 19 October, 2010 9:25 AM
From: "Natasha Cowan" <[email protected]>Add sender to ContactsTo: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Hi yes it is a real request. I am an Australian academic as per my email.
Cheers, Natasha
Sent from my HTC
Natasha Cowan
PhD student
Dept. International Relations
Flinders University
[email protected]
----- Reply message -----
From: "XXXXX" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Oct 18, 2010 10:48 pm
Subject: TR Interview
To: "Natasha Cowan" <[email protected]>
Similar threads
