Yap Keng Ho - Please provide your background

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

Yap Keng Ho,

LKY himself said recently in open court that he would sue anyone who can be identified who has defamed him ok. Oh and FYI with all that shit and crap that you have posted about LKY, he clearly does not have to go to trial for either liability or damages. So cut the BS.

I welcome the morons to sue. They seems to know that they have nothing to earn except opening opportunities that I had awaited.

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

Yap Keng Ho,

Let me add on 3 other questions that have been posed to you before (in one form or another) but have consistently been evaded by you:

1. Were you authorised by Dr Chee to represent him and/or SDP at the 2006 pre election opposition meeting where you apparently claimed that you were Dr Chee's representative?

2. Why were you apparently touting for Ravi and Chia Ti Lik in Sam's old site at Delphi? Was this done with their consent and knowledge?

3. Have you been authorised and/or invited by SDP and/or RP to speak, write and/or take action on their behalf?

You need to stop evading the issues.

Here is a summary for people to consider and for you to respond if you like.

1) As it stands, no one knows you except for Lock and GMS. You have chosen not to clarify.

2) In 2006, in SBF, you claimed that you wanted to stand as an indepedent but changed your mind and mentioned speaking to JBJ. Were you a bankrupt at that time and therefore not eligible in the first place.

3) The position of bankrupcy has been raised again. Please clarify if you are one. If you are not one, then its good to clarify once and for all so people do not misconstrue wrongly.

4) If you are indeed a bankrupt, was it due to non-political reasons such as business etc or due political actions(no need to go into specifics unless its helps your cause). As a public figure and one seeking public support, these are relevant questions.

5) So far you have been attaching colourful adjectives to the despot and tyrant but you have not actually made any allegations about the old man and his clan. For instance, you started a thread in this forum on radiation leak at Changi Naval Base by a US Navy vessel but this has been carried by the press all over the world including here. This is a classic example of your type of "revelation" Things that don't hurt the Lee Clan nor does it sway a Singaporean to your line of thinking. If fact, Singaporeans are put off by these claims.

6) You got to stop dragging in name like Chee, JBJ, Lee Siew Choh, and characters that actually have an impact and whose background is reasonable known to the public.

7) In reference to your first sentence in this post about not expecting people to agree with your views, its more like we have no clue what issues you actually raised in the first place.


We are now at post #117 and you still have not made any attempt to clear the air.

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

Locke,

Let's cut to the chase here. I believe you understand what a character reference is. So, are you in a position to objectively vouch for Yap keng Ho's CHARACTER? If so, can you please provide us with your detailed basis?

Dear One

Honestly I can't understand your need to do an "anwar" or to disparage a man's aims or to discredit, even if you disagree with his methods. You speak as if you come from within the SDP so I will thus treat you as such. Its a small world really and people do talk. So what about your accusations of errr "gate crashing" and errrr " lime light stealing". m&d didn't stick , cat bit your toungue ? I really thought that this new forum would stop serving as a platform for personal political agendas and attacks but old habits die hard. If he has been disowned by the SDP, then let it be, why humiliate him by bringing it up ? Or perhaps he still has influence of sorts thus the personal attacks ? I mean if he is out of the SDP Loop, he is out there is no point flogging a dead horse, no petty advantage. The only real reason is I suspect he is not out of the loop hence the reversal to the old tried and tested tactics of clones.


Locke

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

This is the same old broken record petty childish shit from Sam's old Delphi site, lamely trying to hijack a thread that has nothing whatsoever to do with their petty immature sandbox quarrels SHOO SHOO and let's get back to the valid legitimate questions on YAP KENG HO, thank you very much

haiz now you guys know why those scums are laughing at the opposition...there is simply no unity amongst them to mount a credible fight...

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

For the record, if anyone followed Jufrie's thread at Sam's old Delphi site, you would quickly get the impression that Jufrie and his group were consistently raising subtle questions as to Yap Keng Ho's character for quite a long time.

Feel free to draw your own conclusions

Bro, I think you got the wrong bloke. I had a few running battles with OneUnite in the old forum. Though aligned to SDP, he does not behave like the clones. He is alright, just some strong views. He used to get upset with me when I get on my Gopalan hobby horse. In fact he was the first have doubts about Yap sometime ago and expressed it But no else took notice. He seems to be free with his adjectives as Yap is with his.

Its looks odd when we are all looking for transparency but Yap will only reveal other people's private documents.

Both GMS and you have not made a single comment about the documents. I am sure he still thinks that he has both your support on it as it may fall in the 10% that you agree with where he is concerned.

 

[lockeliberal]

Dear Porfirio

Objectively I would vouch for U Yap based on my past associations with him through various protests and SDP organized events and in private chats outside of these events. He is I believe "sincere" though at times sincerely wrong. I do not agree with some of his posts or many of his writings but I believe that he is sincere.

I do not agree with the assertions that he steals the limelight because I see him working behind the scenes helping out as best as he can. Neither do I believe that he is a gate crasher in any way.

Is he a PAP agent, a spy ? In my viewpoint, he has proven himself not to be one because of his track record in going to jail. True he has not been sued into bankruptcy but than so has many an SDP member and non member , Neither has his blog been sued for defamation but than again he has gone to jail on other issues. If he is a PAP plant going to jail is a hell of a way to earn your pay. He might be a buffoon , a goof , a loose cannon but a PAP agent he is not.

As to my views on coincidences well its just a viewpoint. I can agree or disagree with Scroobal on UYap and whether he is real or not but personal attacks driven by clones in particular one2unite is one coincidence to many.


Locke

 

[Porfirio Rubirosa]

Locke,

I appreciate your reply.

However with respect, I for one do not hold much weight with regards to your character reference because it does NOT address any of the pertinent valid and legitimate questions floating around Yap Keng Ho's character. You appear to "associate" with Yap on a superficial level, and underpin your reference based on his own self inflicted 'prison breaks'. Sorry but no cigar, for me at least.

Forumers can draw their own conclusions. I suggest they examine the totality of the posts thus far before arriving at any conclusion.

Cheers

 

[scroobal]

I can agree or disagree with Scroobal on UYap and whether he is real or not but personal attacks driven by clones in particular one2unite is one coincidence to many.
Locke

Bro, just want clarify that I am not suggesting that Yap is a PAP front, mole or anything. As of late , his actions do favour the PAP buts cast the opposition in bad light. But he truly went berserk in the last few weeks. I then realised that I had no clue about the man. In fact I have commented that he was sincere in my past postings.

Did you ever think, why Ravi would ask Yap to release documents that he is duty bound by the Act to keep confidential. Why can't Ravi release the documents himself. Obviously Ravi is in a certain condition and anyone human would have done the right thing and not taken advantage of it.

I am sure others are just as curious. Unfortunately I guess, like it or not, the man has taken cover under GMS and your umbrella. I would have thought both of you might share some positives but looks like you guys have also no clue.

Its now post #147, we are none the wiser and I suspect like Ho Ching and Denise Tessonsohn, who had dealings with Durai over many years both of you have no clue either. Forget the conspiracy theories and the usual teacups fights, aren't you curious and if you are not, would you begrude others who are keen to know about a man who has vountarily sought publicity and seeks public endorsement. Why else is he all over the place posting left and right.

The moment he released the private document of parties that has nothing do with anything, he laid the rules for engagement. He now can't walk away on a notion of privacy. What is good for the goose must surely be good for the gander. And I think this is soemthing that we all feel strongly about, and thus our concern with old man and his regime.

 

[lockeliberal]

Dear Scroobal

Errr it may be that Ravi himself needs some help just as much as U Yap in some form ? The hint I got from U Yap was that it was the plaintiff or the women seeking help from ravi who used him to release the documents

Honestly the opposition scene in Singapore is filled with assorted weird and wonderful and sometimes eccentric characters to put it mildly. I see no need to defend his eccentricities but more so his sincerity as a person or his integrity from accusations like errr "stealing the limelight" and errr "gate crashing."

That said he is a loose cannon and he comes across as such even face to face but he should be in no way disparaged using the net. Ok then again perhaps in my old age I see one to many coincidences



Locke

 

[one2unite]

Why must this Yap Keng Ho gatecrash into SDP initiated protests and demonstrations if he feels strongly that these activities are 'soft' compared to his way of doing things to bring down the 'old dog thief'!!??

Besides, all those activists together with members and supporters who take part in SDP organized demonstrations put on identical t-shirts with common themes such as high cost of living, foreign cheap labour, democracy, etc. But this clown Yap appears from nowhere with his own attire to disrupt their noble action and ultimately get those involved in it to be either harassed or arrested by the PAP police, who are most probably Yap's paymasters.

Yap is not wanted at RP, neither at SDP and yet this highly suspicious specimen thrusts himself into their activities uninvited. Why??

If he wants to bring down the Leegime, he should go ahead and organize his own protests and campaigns to drum up support for his cause. He shouldn't try to leech on to others, especially when he feels they are not up to his high expectation.

A genuine activist should try to appeal for like-minded individuals to join his cause and not just show up at other people's events with an ulterior motive to provoke and agitate.

My questions to Yap are:

Have you ever organised anything on your own against the Leegime??

What happened to your 'hunger strike' in front of the Istana??

It's time fakes and charlatans like Yap are unmasked for what they are before they cause more damage to the 'vociferous' opposition that is gaining support from the people.

 

[one2unite]

There's a world of difference between CSJ and this Yap chap. Chee has organized and is organizing protests and demonstrations for like-minded people to join force with him in opposing the system. The movement that Chee leads is growing.

But has Yap ever organized anything on his own, apart from leeching on others??

It's an insult to compare CSJ with fakes and charlatans like Yap who are nothing but agent provocateurs on the payroll of the Leegime.

 

[gobuster]

Why you said UY is leeching on others?
UY is not one of those like-minded people joining force with CSJ in opposing the system?

 

[scroobal]

Dear Scroobal

The hint I got from U Yap was that it was the plaintiff or the women seeking help from ravi who used him to release the documents

Its not a hint. He stated that in his posts. I am referring to the other parent and the other law firm. Did Yap get approval or clearence from them. Has he sought clarification from them. Has he even spoken to them. Like I said, he probably thinks that you are ok with it.

Honestly the opposition scene in Singapore is filled with assorted weird and wonderful and sometimes eccentric characters to put it mildly. I see no need to defend his eccentricities but more so his sincerity as a person or his integrity from accusations like errr "stealing the limelight" and errr "gate crashing."

That said he is a loose cannon and he comes across as such even face to face but he should be in no way disparaged using the net. Ok then again perhaps in my old age I see one to many coincidences
Locke

I do think they have a fair point. Its like an invited kid who insists on cutting the birthday cake while the Birthday boy is standing there watching. Now it looks like he was not even invited in the first place.

Like I said before, I could not figure why he kept changing t-shirt in the last 2years and during the parliament protest was wearing red but not the SDP endorsed one. I only figured out when he himself posted in this forum on his differences with SDP. I am actually amazed that SDP did not even let out a whimper. Bro Profiro was right, the first hints came from Jufrie's gang and I noticed it from 1Unite.

Seriously too many questions and no answers as opposed to too few answers.

 

[one2unite]

Why you said UY is leeching on others?
UY is not one of those like-minded people joining force with CSJ in opposing the system?

Yap is an imposter, a fake trying to ride on others in the 'vociferous' opposition who are fighting to change the system.

All that this leech Yap does through his antics is to help the Lee regime postpone its inevitable demise.

His assigned role by his paymasters is to gatecrash into protests and demonstrations organised by genuine reformists and thus create confusion and doubts in the minds of the general populace who are yearning for change.

 

[gobuster]

If you said is true, why organisers like SDP never expose him in those events all these years? Why they are not exposing his assigned role and his paymasters now?

 

[one2unite]

If you said is true, why organisers like SDP never expose him in those events all these years? Why they are not exposing his assigned role and his paymasters now?

Those who have been following SDP website and its events from the 2006 WB-IMF standoff knew that Yap is an outsider and an insignificant figure. He is not worth any mention. After all who is he??

Despite repeated statements in SDP website that clearly stated Yap had nothing in common with the party, it's the 154th PAP mouthpiece with an ulterior motive that had kept referring to agent provocateur Yap as SDP supporter.

 

[myjohnson]

In his new post somewhere in this forum, he used regime instead of his normal salutation
of LEEgime. Thought I saw a flash of white there.

 

[scroobal]

Despite repeated statements in SDP website that clearly stated Yap had nothing in common with the party, it's the 154th PAP mouthpiece with an ulterior motive that had kept referring to agent provocateur Yap as SDP supporter.

When and where in SDP website was this clarification made? People I am sure did not come to that conclusion from SPH. I think they got it from numerous post that Yap made on SDP events and the fact that SDP did not correct the perception.

Anyone else that we need to know is not associated with SDP?

 

[Goh Meng Seng]

There's a world of difference between CSJ and this Yap chap. Chee has organized and is organizing protests and demonstrations for like-minded people to join force with him in opposing the system. The movement that Chee leads is growing.

But has Yap ever organized anything on his own, apart from leeching on others??

It's an insult to compare CSJ with fakes and charlatans like Yap who are nothing but agent provocateurs on the payroll of the Leegime.

I wish to you to clarify one thing:

Are you speaking on behalf of SDP?

I am very curious, Dr. Chee and SDP are organizing protests and activities as a GROUP; obviously Uncle Yap is just an individual whom I don't expect him to have the manpower and resources to organize anything. If he really can organize a protest that can get people to protest with him, then I worry! LOL!

And you are talking as if any activity organized by SDP or Dr Chee will not welcome any individuals like Uncle Yap to participate, else they risk being seen as "gate crashing"! Is that SDP's stand or what?

Or that SDP and Dr Chee have officially indicated that Uncle Yap is not welcome to any activities organized by them?

If not, on what basis do you claim that Uncle Yap is "gatecrashing"? It seems that you have attended many SDP organized activities; so are you a SDP member or just any other member of public that "gate crash" their activities?

Goh Meng Seng

 

[yblzh]

Its not a hint. He stated that in his posts. I am referring to the other parent and the other law firm. Did Yap get approval or clearence from them. Has he sought clarification from them. Has he even spoken to them. Like I said, he probably thinks that you are ok with it.

Any document filed in court or police report are public record, and public domain.

Who is to seek every person's permission to post it?

PAP govt's OA released Chee Siok Chin's account information which is much more confidential and personal, did they get any permission? They are supposed to be a state accountant and legal body with professionalism, acting only like 3rd class clowns.