• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Would you send your parents to nursing home ?

Khaw-Boon-Wan-199x300.jpg


One man will .
 
if you think that something is behind this creation ...so who create your god ? :D;)

Someone must have been just there in the beginning, the creator not the created. That's the basis of monotheist religions like Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Can anyone prove it? Of course not. If proven, it'd be called science, not religion. Even the chicken and the egg haven't become scientifically explained yet, though we see them with our own eyes. An egg hatches from a hen. A chick hatches from an egg. One of them must have came first in the beginning. Question is which one?
 
Someone must have been just there in the beginning, the creator not the created. That's the basis of monotheist religions like Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Can anyone prove it? Of course not. If proven, it'd be called science, not religion. Even the chicken and the egg haven't become scientifically explained yet, though we see them with our own eyes. An egg hatches from a hen. A chick hatches from an egg. One of them must have came first in the beginning. Question is which one?

British scientists believe they have found the answer to an ages-old question: Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

Scientists cracked the puzzle after discovering that the formation of eggs is possible only thanks to a protein found in chicken's ovaries. That means eggs have to be formed in chickens first.

The protein -- called ovocledidin-17 (OC-17) -- speeds up the development of the shell. Researchers from Sheffield and Warwick universities in England laid out their findings in the paper "Structural Control of Crystal Nuclei by an Eggshell Protein."

They used a supercomputer to zoom in on the formation of an egg and realized the protein is vital in kick-starting the crystallization process. It works by converting calcium carbonate into the calcite crystals that make up the egg shell.

Dr Colin Freeman, from Sheffield University's Department of Engineering Materials, said "it had long been suspected that the egg came first -- but now we have the scientific proof that shows that in fact the chicken came first."

"The protein had been identified before and it was linked to egg formation, but by examining it closely we have been able to see how it controls the process," Freeman said.

"It's very interesting to find that different types of avian species seem to have a variation of the protein that does the same job."


by the way , who create the creator ? who create god ? dont you tell me your god is the creator ? if your god is the creator ...who create your god ? ;)....so now the answer for the chicken and egg are solved ...very soon science will also debunk religions....in fact they already debunked them ...;) . please dont divert my question from the invisible man to chicken ....;)
 
Last edited:
maybe you will not send your parent to nursing home, but pap will send you to nursing home in JB when you retired.
 
Then the chicken comes first explanation is common to both Christianity and science. So who created the first chicken that didn't hatch from an egg. In the chain of tracing back in such a question, there're only two possible answers. One is someone must be there in the beginning who's simply there, or infinity, i.e. indefinitely untraceable. Choose what you want to believe in yourself. I don't like to convince people as to what to believe in or not to believe in.
 
Then the chicken comes first explanation is common to both Christianity and science. So who created the first chicken that didn't hatch from an egg. In the chain of tracing back in such a question, there're only two possible answers. One is someone must be there in the beginning who's simply there, or infinity, i.e. indefinitely untraceable. Choose what you want to believe in yourself. I don't like to convince people as to what to believe in or not to believe in.

finding answer whether the invisible man exists is much more easy then finding who or what create this universal ..:D;) so please dont mix those two questions up . ;):D . if ppl believed in spaghetti monster ...do you not tell them its not real ? or you just play along with them ? if ppl believed that cheating and stealing is right ...do you not tell them its wrong ?
 
Last edited:
It's either someone is there in the beginning or it's infinity. You can believe in either one of them or neither of them, believeing in neither of them being don't think about it. None of them can be proven or are at least yet to be proven anyway.
 
Someone must have been just there in the beginning, the creator not the created. That's the basis of monotheist religions like Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Can anyone prove it? Of course not. If proven, it'd be called science, not religion. Even the chicken and the egg haven't become scientifically explained yet, though we see them with our own eyes. An egg hatches from a hen. A chick hatches from an egg. One of them must have came first in the beginning. Question is which one?

I tell you which one came first .
It's the mother that will always come first before an egg .
That's all I ever needed to know .
 
It's either someone is there in the beginning or it's infinity. You can believe in either one of them or neither of them, believeing in neither of them being don't think about it. None of them can be proven or are at least yet to be proven anyway.

who say none of them can be proven ...do you need me to break down why there is no god in order to prove it to you ? :D;):rolleyes:
 
finding answer whether the invisible man exists is much more easy then finding who or what create this universal ..:D;) so please dont mix those two questions up . ;):D . if ppl believed in spaghetti monster ...do you not tell them its not real ? or you just play along with them ? if ppl believed that cheating and stealing is right ...do you not tell them its wrong ?

Well society in majority can force them to conform with prisons institutions and different levels of enforcement .
 
I tell you which one came first .
It's the mother that will always come first before an egg .
That's all I ever needed to know .

ram will tell you his " father " comes first before everything in this world ...:D:rolleyes:
 
Well society in majority can force them to conform with prisons institutions and different levels of enforcement .

but ram thinks that it is not RIGHT for anybody to force ppl believe what is right or wrong ....:D;):rolleyes:
 
I'm not concerned about what others believe or don't believe. Whatever and however differently we believe, we're in this place together, till death do us part from this place. Why be so uptight? Take it easy.
 
I'm not concerned about what others believe or don't believe.

of course you are not concerned about that when comes to your own religion .:D;) you rather ppl falls for your religion traps ..:D:rolleyes:
 
of course you are not concerned about that when comes to your own religion .:D;) you rather ppl falls for your religion traps ..:D:rolleyes:

Frankly, I don't give a damn whether others fall into traps or drains in terms of faith. But if I see strangers falling into drains physically and I could help, I would help. That's all.
 
Frankly, I don't give a damn whether others fall into traps or drains in terms of faith. But if I see strangers falling into drains physically and I could help, I would help. That's all.

why your religion so special , you have to protect it ? :D;):rolleyes:
 
why your religion so special , you have to protect it ? :D;):rolleyes:

Since when have I protected it? I don't encourage people to believe unless somehow they real feel like it. Otherwise heaven may get too crowded. Don't think it a good idea to have HDB, COE and ERP there. :D

In fact, I'm in disdain and disgusted with people like Prince Singh and Kong Hee.
 
Since when have I protected it? I don't encourage people to believe unless somehow they real feel like it. Otherwise heaven may get too crowded. Don't think it a good idea to have HDB, COE and ERP there. :D

heaven your head lah ....since you and teekee both like heaven so much ...might as well kiss goodbye to earth now ...:D;):rolleyes:
 
heaven your head lah ....since you and teekee both like heaven so much ...might as well kiss goodbye to earth now ...:D;):rolleyes:

No, no, Tee Kee likes heaven. I don't fancy the idea of playing harp all day long in infinite eternity. Just in case nowhere else better to go. Just like a dead men's home version of old folks' home. :D

I'm Anglican Episcopal. Tell you fact is many of the COE bishops and brethrens don't really believe in God. It's more of a political club at bishop level and social club at brethren level. :rolleyes:

The Queen is supposed to be Defender Of The Faith but the Prime Minister and Archbishop Of Canterbury always advise her not to mention God since she also knows nothing much about God. :o
 
Back
Top