The typical Sinkie trait rears it's ugly head once again. There are simply too many Chow Ah Bengs who are incapable of carrying out a debate without resorting to profanities to try to win an argument.
The reason why taxes should not be used to assist destitutes is simple. If such a scheme was introduced, there would suddenly be a flood of self declared destitutes cashing in on the generosity of the taxpayer.
It happens all the time in welfare states. In NZ, there is freakin' family who is receiving NZD1000 a WEEK. They have not done a decent days work for the last 15 years!!!!! Why should they? If the govt gave me $4000 pm, I'd be living the life of Riley too!:p
Fuck you once again chao cheebye! This is just a fucking online forum, not some kind of debate competition. Stop being a wanker and get a life will you?
Face it man! Freeloaders are here to stay, with Social security or without. Yes, there is no doubt that with the implementation of a social security system here, the number of freeloaders will increase. But what about the genuine cases!? Let them die just because of these fucking freeloaders? Do these freeloaders constitute the majority of the population such that their claim on welfare will bankrupt the whole country? Before condemning the Social security system, perhaps a cost-benefit analysis should be taken out. Singaporeans in the middle class onwards are all relatively well off, surely it wouldn't hurt them much to contribute a little right. It's not like this burden should be entirely shouldered upon by the citizens; the government should contribute too by reducing the size of their SWF and their multi-million dollars pay!
We don't have to shell out a few thousand dollars on each of these welfare seekers. The level of payout should be pegged according to the cost of living in Singapore. There should also be some kind of interview, asset test or income test to be fulfilled before the welfare cheques are paid out. Or if you are so scared that those welfare seekers are mostly freeloaders, can always offer goods in kind instead! Tiu!:oIo: