- Joined
- Jul 16, 2008
- Messages
- 24,317
- Points
- 113
poor thingThey must have been drinking and swimming in overproof vodka![]()
They must have been drinking and swimming in overproof vodka![]()
more pain and suffering to satisfy someone's ego.poor thing
probably sent to front line by pootin
how I wonder can you even make this prediction? Nothing out there supports it.There will be no ukraine left by summer next year. It will be part of russia,
Germany's economy, previously fueled by cheap russian lng will be devastated.
Most german manufacturers will move more assets to china, their biggest market.
It’s a proxy war started by the americunts. The whole point is to disarm russia and take over its land. Nothing to with Ukraine which has been turned into a US political construct used for crime against humanityUkraine and Russia both want to end the war but can't find a way out of it without big concessions. at the present time they rather continue fighting with no end
Russia was dragged into this fiasco reluctantly. They waited 8 years for Ukraine to solve its civil war.Ukraine and Russia both want to end the war but can't find a way out of it without big concessions. at the present time they rather continue fighting with no end in sight.
Low IQ shitskin detected. The stated objectives of the war in Putin's own words was to "denazify and demilitarize" Ukraine which meant that the Russians intended to replace Zelensky with a Kremlin stooge and thereby forestall any attempt by Ukraine to join NATO. Russia did not enter into the war reluctantly, the plan was in the making since Maidan as demonstrated by the appearance of Russian "volunteers" and Wagner operatives in Donbass. The Russians thought they could waltz in without facing resistance (like they did in Crimea) and annex Ukraine. After the failed offensive on Kiev and setbacks in Kharkiv and Kherson, Russia has now changed its objectives to just occupying the territory that they seized. Also, you have to be pathetically naive to think that Russia has never threatened Europe since the 1990s, the invasion of Georgia (after the election of a pro-Western government), the annexation of Crimea, threatening to deploy short-range missiles if the US places missile defense systems in Europe, the Salisbury poisoning all point to a Russian policy that is aimed at undermining the rules-based order in Europe. Russia had intended to use Europe's dependence (primarily Germany/de-facto EU leader) on its oil and gas as leverage to undermine US soft power and the unity of the West, it had no interest in "strengthen Europe" as you put it. Moscow wanted a weak Europe that was easy to blackmail by turning off the gas tap, fortunately, with the invasion of Ukraine, Russia no longer has any leverage over the EU and is now embroiled in a protracted war with tens of thousands of its soldiers dead and a hundred thousand more wounded.Russia was dragged into this fiasco reluctantly. They waited 8 years for Ukraine to solve its civil war.
And initially in this military operations, it was just to resolve the lukhansk and donbass people's reluctance to be part if ukraine.
Russia, since 1990's, never threatened europe. But offered their vast energy resources to strengthen europe economically.
US and UK does not want this. A united europe threatens anglo saxon world domination.that is what its all about.
A most evil and cruel man, totally out of sync with the 21st century. Needs to be exterminated.more pain and suffering to satisfy someone's ego.
Until today, you are still blinded by the doctrines of Bloodymir Putin. You are totally incorrigible. Tell me what has Russia to lose by not instigating this invasion. Has NATO stepped an inch into Russian territory?Russia was dragged into this fiasco reluctantly. They waited 8 years for Ukraine to solve its civil war.
And initially in this military operations, it was just to resolve the lukhansk and donbass people's reluctance to be part if ukraine.
Russia, since 1990's, never threatened europe. But offered their vast energy resources to strengthen europe economically.
US and UK does not want this. A united europe threatens anglo saxon world domination.that is what its all about.
This defense of Russia point is total garbage. If anything, Russia has been severely weakened by it. Not only that, but a lot of countries sitting on the fence are now actively anti-Russia. Where they used to have neutral neighbours, they now have NATO neighbours. Great job!Until today, you are still blinded by the doctrines of Bloodymir Putin. You are totally incorrigible. Tell me what has Russia to lose by not instigating this invasion. Has NATO stepped an inch into Russian territory?
I believe there was a understanding that NATO will not expand eastward after russia pullled out of eastern europe unilaterally.Low IQ shitskin detected. The stated objectives of the war in Putin's own words was to "denazify and demilitarize" Ukraine which meant that the Russians intended to replace Zelensky with a Kremlin stooge and thereby forestall any attempt by Ukraine to join NATO. Russia did not enter into the war reluctantly, the plan was in the making since Maidan as demonstrated by the appearance of Russian "volunteers" and Wagner operatives in Donbass. The Russians thought they could waltz in without facing resistance (like they did in Crimea) and annex Ukraine. After the failed offensive on Kiev and setbacks in Kharkiv and Kherson, Russia has now changed its objectives to just occupying the territory that they seized. Also, you have to be pathetically naive to think that Russia has never threatened Europe since the 1990s, the invasion of Georgia (after the election of a pro-Western government), the annexation of Crimea, threatening to deploy short-range missiles if the US places missile defense systems in Europe, the Salisbury poisoning all point to a Russian policy that is aimed at undermining the rules-based order in Europe. Russia had intended to use Europe's dependence (primarily Germany/de-facto EU leader) on its oil and gas as leverage to undermine US soft power and the unity of the West, it had no interest in "strengthen Europe" as you put it. Moscow wanted a weak Europe that was easy to blackmail by turning off the gas tap, fortunately, with the invasion of Ukraine, Russia no longer has any leverage over the EU and is now embroiled in a protracted war with tens of thousands of its soldiers dead and a hundred thousand more wounded.![]()
The whole aim of the US is to weaken russia by forcing it to spend heavily on its military. Like what happened when ussr collapsed.russuan economy cannot match the might of the US forces financed by its perpetual issuance of debt.This defense of Russia point is total garbage. If anything, Russia has been severely weakened by it. Not only that, but a lot of countries sitting on the fence are now actively anti-Russia. Where they used to have neutral neighbours, they now have NATO neighbours. Great job!![]()