The PAP is demolishing this family like it does to opposition politicians. The PAP press and media is the main weapon here.
So, why doesn't the PAP spell out the exact amount offered? $100k? $500k? $750k? $1 million? With a number, the PAP can bs all it wants. How do we know the compensation offer is generous?
Okay, so this guy is a triad member ...can he not changed?
Assuming $2k per month for 35 years ...the compensation should be $700k. This figure is lowball as there there is no bonus, no AWS, no salary increment, no accounting for inflation. If we take all those into account, the compensation should be more than $1 million.
Let's see the PAP's offer before we can judge if the PAP is the reasonable party.
Whether the inmate was an angel or demon, it is not the issue. Whether the govt offer $1M or $10K is beisdes the point...if anything, the more generous they are, the more eager they are to hush up.
The main issue is a man died under custody and there seems to be no interest on the part
of the authorities to pursue what looks like more a more likely version of what took place. Their version starts by saying Dinesh
unprovoked kicked the prison guard for no reason. Let me ask you does this make sense for some one to go
And kick another with full power and authority to overpower and inflict punishment 'unprovoked'.......this version
of the story has a large missing chunk. How do they know for sure there was a kick and it was unprovoked?
It is not right for things to be left this way and for govt to try to close the issue with so many unanswered
questions with the possibility of guilty parties going unpunished and no further measures in the prison service
to prevent such things from happening.
Government Statement on Dinesh Raman Reprehensible | The Online Citizen
Government Statement on Dinesh Raman Reprehensible
We deplore the statement issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs in respect of the late Mr Dinesh Raman s/o Chinniah, entitled Statement regarding the case of Dinesh Raman s/o Chinniah, published on the ministry’s website on 13 September 2013.
There is a claim before the courts. The family desires to learn the facts of their son and brother’s death while in the custody of the Singapore Prison Service. The details of the MHA press release pertaining to Mr Dinesh’s past, ostensibly in order to determine the quantum of compensation, have instead rehearsed his past misdeeds in order to conduct a character assassination ahead of the court hearing. It is designed to swing public opinion from sympathy for the family. Moreover, these matters are irrelevant to the case before the court.
They were then repeated in the mainstream media without regard for the sensibilities of the family or basic norms of courtesy. We urge the media to show more sensitivity to the family’s situation.
The action of the ministry in publishing its press release is deeply wrong. It has done so in a way that is clearly intended to destroy Mr Dinesh’s posthumous reputation. We have no doubt that by doing so it has added to the deep grief of the family, already suffering the profound pain of their only son’s loss. It is entirely unseemly for the Ministry of Home Affairs to have done so.
As fellow citizens, we demand that the Minister for Home Affairs apologise to the family.
This statement is signed by the following individuals (in no particular order)
Leslie Chew
Priscilla Chia
Joshua Chiang
Stephanie Chok
Damien Chng
Jean Chong
Chong Kaixiong
Neth Chong
Choo Zhengxi
Fadli Bin Fawzi
Han Huihui
Gilbert Goh
Ho Choon Hiong
Kirsten Han
Russell Heng
Adrian Heok
Vanessa Ho
Dan Koh
Dana Lam
Vincent Law
Basil Lee
Lynn Lee
Corinna Lim
Lim Jialiang
Andrew Loh
Braema Mathi
Ng Yi-Sheng
Roy Ngerng
Pak Geok Choo
Russell Heng
Roy Tan
Shawn Tan
Vivian Pan
Alfian Sa’at
Martyn See
Siew Kum Hong
Miak Siew
Isrizal Mohamed Isa
Shafiie Syhami
Constance Singam
Kenneth Tan
Roy Tan
Shawn Tan
Shelley Thio
Melissa Tsang
Vidula Verma
Jolovan Wham
Vincent Wijeysingha
Wong U-Wen
Terry Xu
Yap Ching Wi
Rachel Zeng
It is highly deplorable the govt use the media it controls to conduct a PR campaign against
the family and the victim because they choose not to take generous amounts of money offer to stay silent and to continue their pursuit of the truth. It shows a lack of integrity of those in govt to resort to such ugly tactics.
Last edited: