Re: The strange phenomenon of mixed marriages in the Malay community, and repercussio
hes filling in for sam.
JohnTan is bizzaro-esque in this thread.
hes filling in for sam.
JohnTan is bizzaro-esque in this thread.
No I am not.
I am stating a fact. Most people, regardless of religion, want prosperity and good health. Only crazies like you who crave martyrdom, desire poverty and ill-health and quote Matthew 5:3.
Why don't you start by donating all your money and get yourself really poor?
The reason they do this is because they want a better future. Period.
Malays are minority race in Singapore that is why the rate of mixed marriages in Singapore is higher. Check Malaysia I bet it is lower.
Same with non white races in Canada marrying mixed is also higher.
Simple.
Nonsense! My relative daughter married to a male chinese convert. Children follow father surname and race indicate "Chinese"
As i have mentioned is all politics. As majority are muslims in Indon wat better way to shore up support by using Islam as a tool. Tio boh? I also saw ladies taking selfies...smiling away. U call tat violent? Any ppl got killed? Rape? Murder? Shops looted ransacked? The demo seems to be was a peacful one. Just like wat u see at Speakers corner.
Yes. I agree with u. Definitely those ulamas better qualified than me. But is their country. They can do wat they like. Even the Quran already stated watever law or policy u meted out u will be answereable to the Lord. Want me to quote from Quran? Try to understand john. Some of these countries are using Islam as a tool to further strengthen their position. So obvious. U cant see it meh. Need glasses
I mentioned normal cos i dont remember any ustaz or ustazah being called up for questioning. Tat means our madrasah are doing just fine. Hey even some of our malay Mps children also attended madrasah. R u also implying their children are terrorist by attending madrasah?
But the comments on this thread so far seems to indicate that Malays themselves do not respect their own race and wants to marry outside of it. Even prominent Malays don;t marry within their own community eg. one third of malay marriages are to non malays? Wow. Like that, if they don't respect their own race and will not fight the PAP, then why should the other racial communities care?
Poor, war torn 3rd world countries is a common theme with overwhelming majority of islamic societies. That's the fruits of a muslim majority society.
You will find an inverse correlation between religiosity vis-a-vis the wealth of countries. The wealthier the countries, the more atheists and "nominal" Christians, Muslims, etc there are. The poorer the people, the more religious they become as they seek solace in religion, see religious apparitions, "miracle", etc as a soothing balm. Look at impoverished Christian Eastern Europe as an example.
I will say it's more of the the majority in such countries embracing Islam then the Islamic religion causing poverty. Otherwise, how do you explain the "Golden Age of Islam" where Muslims, relying on the same Quran and tenets of their faith, that very same holy book and tenets which are now being unthinkingly used and exploited to explain the Muslim world, have ruled and lived in very successful societies, and have gloried in areas of Astronomy, Mathematics, Science, Philosophy, etc?
The fact is civilisations go through cycles. The Muslim world is undeniably going through a rough patch, a fall from its "Golden Age of Islam". Likewise, China underwent a rough patch from its glory days as the "Middle Kingdom" of the world to being a war-torn and impoverished country. But it is now on the rise to reclaim its place in the world. Ditto for the Whites who emerged from their caves to climb up the cycle, rule the world, but are now sliding down the cycle even as we speak.
The Islamic world will get out of its current rough patch and ascend that civilisational cycle once again. It will take a few hundred years but I have no doubt it will happen just as it has happened, and is happening to and for other civilisations.
Next, there is no such thing as islamic science just as there is no such thing as christian science and technology. Technology was not invented by religion nor birthed from technology. The inventor(s) may have a religion, but the technology developed is just technology.
The islamic society today has developed an organized mechanism to entrench its ideas and to resist innovation. Societies climb out of their backwardness when they start to do things differently. Islamic societies today blame their woes on others constantly and seek solace by being even more religious and rigid and intolerant. It is not just at the political level but also at the grassroots level. There is no similar reformation enlightenment movement in islam.
It is easier for the chinks to climb out of their hole because the chinks are able to adapt and have a policy of self improvement. The chinks are also way more tolerant, allowing different beliefs in their own country to flourish. You don't see the Taoists, Buddhists, Confucianists and Animist busy trying to slaughter each other or kill their own followers for leaving the religion.
The chinks also have a similar work ethic to the Protestant work ethic. Not all cultures and beliefs are equal. Some lead to a better life, others just exponentially increases your odds of getting stuck in a poverty, violent trap with little way out.
Even in a mixed marriage, kids who identify themselves as chinks stand a higher chance of doing better in life than those who identify themselves as m&d. It's a hard truth.
I am curious to know a non-muslim can step inside a regular mosque? It's an offence to the muslims?
I have been to beach road sultan mosque but it is a tourist spot. Cannot step inside the main hall by barricade, look and take photo from outside only.
Her race could have been stated as "Malay" if your niece or parents wanted it to be so.
The old and ongoing misconceptions, clarifications and explanations about this can be found in the thread, "Re: Shooting oneself in the foot: PAP’s screw up of the reserve elections for EP."
They are just one step away from being actual terrorists. Incitement to violence is not peaceful, very different from Speakers corner. You need glasses or a new brain.
You seem to be happy when islamists "use islam to strengthen their position" since as a muslim, you will the beneficiary. Is that why islamic apologists like you constantly try to justify and support the actions of islamic militants?
Like I said, we keep our ustaz here on a very tight leash. It is not so for most parts of the world, where overwhelming majority of madrassahs are breeding grounds for islamic militancy and shit stirring.
The Islamic world will get out of its current rough patch and ascend that civilisational cycle once again. It will take a few hundred years but I have no doubt it will happen just as it has happened, and is happening to and for other civilisations.
You are assuming the worst for these Islamic societies, i.e. that this status quo is an unchanging constant and will remain forever.
PTADER said:If this is indeed the case, the factors that contributed to the "Golden Age of Islam" would, as unchanging constants, result in the "Golden Age of Islam" carrying on to this present day. Needless to say, it has not. I see the factors contributing to the present status quo not as constants but as variables that contribute to the rise and fall cycle of civilisations.
Again, this is cyclical in nature. Otherwise, how do we explain the lengthy period of poverty and hardship that the Chinese underwent? It was only in the last 30 years that 700+ million plus Chinese were lifted out of poverty. They were dirt poor before that and poverty was passed on from one generation to another. Hundreds of millions of Chinese continue to be poor today.
And how do we explain the impoverished societies of Europe before the Renaissance and Industrial revolution? The Chinese and WASPs' work ethics are not immune to this cycle. The conservative values, emphasis on hard work, savings, discipline, family (formed by marriage between a man and a woman) which led to the ascent of WASP societies on the cycle have been, and continues to be steadily eroded and replaced with liberal ideas of welfarism (leading to laziness), uncontrolled spending, fixations with gay marriage "equality", etc and are factors that have led to decline of WASP societies along the cycle.
whoami said:Nope. I dont see it like the way u see it. Very stereotype. Just cos they wave islamic flag they are terrorists. They simply not happy with Ah Hock. I ever asked some Indon Chinese whether Ah Hock is at fault. They said yes hes at fault too. He shouldnt question the ulama cos hes not a Muslim. Like i told u many times all these demo were politically motivated.
The riots started because a muslim candidate went around saying that muslims should are not allowed to vote for non-Muslims. Do you agree or disagree with that statement that muslims are not allowed to be led non-muslims? Yes or no only.
Ahok disagreed, said that the voters were being misled, and a doctored clip of the incident was spread, the ulamas took that opportunity to mobilize their mosque resources to get rid of a christian chinese governor. So what is the difference between politically motivated and religiously motivated to you then?
Not easy to have a healthy discussion with you when you side with lies to get rid of non-muslim elected leaders simply because you feel the need to side with your own religion's people regardless of any reason.
NOw u change to riot? See how u manipulate twist and turn. Isnt tat a white lie?
Whether i agree or disagree why should i bother. I am not an indon. If its religiously motivated then hes a hypocrite cos he himself involve with sex scandal. U consider him religious jus cos hes a muslim? I say hes a "warlord".
Well u too. Very steretype. I quote so many verses fm the Quran. Yet u didnt bother to pause and contemplate but keep shooting ur mouth and keep repeating same even over and over again like old broken record. Ah hock ah hock...riot???
Wooo...scary sia. But i dont see any of the demo carrying parang guns or rifles. To the indon such demo is the norm. Carrying islamic placard is also a norm in most muslim counties. ONly a frog like u in sinklie well doesnt mix around with tourists from Indon only know how to assume tis and tat. Even Indon chinese agree tat it was all politically motivated. But u being a sinkie put the blame of Islam. Everything blame on Islam but unable to quote verses from the Quran